Europe - UNEP
Europe - UNEP
Europe - UNEP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Rudesheim, Rhine River, Germany. Photo credit: Sandra Arbogast.<br />
national and transboundary waters, it has been<br />
just as influential in promoting cooperation over<br />
transboundary waters in <strong>Europe</strong>. Through a<br />
combination of key principles, such as achieving<br />
good water status in all EU waters by 2015, and<br />
detailed procedural rules, such as the production<br />
of river basin management plans, the EU WFD is<br />
set to bring about significant changes to the way<br />
water is managed within <strong>Europe</strong>. Even beyond<br />
the EU region, e.g., in the Dnieper basin, the EU<br />
WFD has influenced the negotiation of basinwide<br />
legal agreements. Moreover, through its<br />
institutional structure the EU is well placed to<br />
address pressing challenges within <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
water resource management, such as flood<br />
management and the protection of groundwater.<br />
Despite such positive trends in institutional<br />
capacity building within <strong>Europe</strong>, from an issuebased<br />
perspective, chapter four highlighted a<br />
number of areas where the institutional capacity<br />
for the management of transboundary waters<br />
could be strengthened. On a positive note, treaty<br />
law shows that <strong>Europe</strong>an countries have<br />
endorsed the substantive rule of equitable and<br />
reasonable utilisation, and also the duty to take<br />
all appropriate measures to prevent, control and<br />
reduce transboundary impact. However,<br />
establishing the practical procedural rules and<br />
mechanisms that effectively and efficiently<br />
implement the latter substantive rules has proved<br />
to be more problematic. The analysis in chapter<br />
four showed that in certain areas such as<br />
monitoring and assessment, public participation,<br />
and compliance, there were clear gaps within<br />
existing agreements. In addition, little work has<br />
been done in assessing the effectiveness of such<br />
agreements in accordance with their aims and<br />
objectives as more emphasis has been placed on<br />
ensuring compliance with international<br />
agreements. Measuring the effectiveness of<br />
international agreements is strongly dependent<br />
on there being sufficient data of a suitable<br />
standard to evaluate the key joint management<br />
issues within the basin. Similarly public<br />
participation and appropriate compliance<br />
strategies can go a long way to ensuring that<br />
basin-agreements are both implemented and<br />
effective. Useful guidance on how countries can<br />
develop these aspects of water resource<br />
management can be found within the UNECE<br />
and EU framework. However, in many cases lack<br />
of financial resources and the absence of<br />
capacity development measures will be major<br />
impediments to strengthening basin agreements.<br />
This issue thus highlights the role that<br />
international donors should take in developing<br />
basin-wide agreements; a role that has been<br />
clearly illustrated within the case studies and list<br />
of international projects.<br />
Chapter 6. Conclusion — 83