20.10.2014 Views

Europe - UNEP

Europe - UNEP

Europe - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dnieper Delta near the Black Sea, at Kherson, Ukraine. Photo credit: Uaquantum, via Wikimedia Commons.<br />

legal arrangements and promote the sustainable<br />

management of the waters of the Dnieper<br />

agreement.<br />

The poor environmental state of the basin<br />

as well as the problems related to the provision<br />

of good quality drinking water supply and the<br />

conservation of the biological diversity of the<br />

landscape are highlighted in the preamble of the<br />

draft Dnieper agreement. The preamble also<br />

recognises that current local, national, and<br />

international level efforts are insufficient to ensure<br />

the substantial improvement of the environmental<br />

state of the Dnieper basin, and that rehabilitation<br />

can only be ensured through focused and<br />

coordinated action at the international and<br />

national level. Interestingly, despite the fact that<br />

the Dnieper countries are not EU member<br />

countries, the preamble makes reference not only<br />

to the bilateral and multilateral agreements<br />

(mentioned above) but also to the guiding<br />

principles and approaches of the EU WFD.<br />

If implemented, the Dnieper agreement<br />

would require the basin countries to implement<br />

the SAP for the Dnieper basin in order to achieve<br />

sustainable natural use and environmental<br />

conservation of the basin. The agreement would<br />

also oblige countries to establish the adequate<br />

legal and institutional framework for the<br />

international management of the basin, including<br />

a sound legislative framework for multi- and<br />

bilateral cooperation, enhanced cooperation with<br />

international donor agencies in the field of<br />

environmental rehabilitation of the Dnieper basin,<br />

and the provision of a sufficient framework to<br />

encourage and promote public participation in<br />

decision-making processes at the national and<br />

international level. Furthermore, the draft<br />

agreement would require countries to convene a<br />

conference with the involved parties as a supreme<br />

body responsible for managing the Dnieper<br />

basin, and establish the International Dnieper<br />

Basin Commission, assisted by a permanent<br />

secretariat. A number of related organisations<br />

would support the work of the commission, some<br />

of which already exist. For example, the<br />

International Dnieper Council currently acts as a<br />

consultative body to ensure the effective<br />

implementation of cooperative arrangements<br />

focused on the rehabilitation of the Dnieper<br />

basin. Other institutions envisaged include the<br />

International Dnieper Basin Thematic Centres and<br />

the International Forum of Non-Governmental<br />

Organisation.<br />

Chapter 5. Hydropolitical Vulnerability and Resilience Case Studies — 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!