25.10.2014 Views

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Corruption in public health 73<br />

Figure 1 demonstrates the relationship between governance<br />

indices and measures of health performance and outcomes. Measles<br />

immunization coverage provides a robust measure of public service<br />

performance as it reflects government’s ability to perform a critical<br />

and basic health service. Measles immunization by itself is particularly<br />

important since when administered in infancy it sharply<br />

reduces all causes of mortality in childhood (Koenig et al., 1991;<br />

Aaby 1995). It is also easily measured. Child mortality is a standard<br />

variable for measuring health outcomes, is influenced by a wide<br />

range of factors beyond the quality and extent of health care<br />

services, but has the advantage that it is available for a large<br />

number of countries.<br />

The six panels in Figure 1 show the scatter plots for both indicators<br />

and each of the three components of the KKM governance<br />

index: government effectiveness, control of corruption, and voice<br />

and accountability. Of the three measures, and compared to the<br />

aggregate governance indicator (not shown), government effectiveness<br />

best correlates with poor outcomes and performance in health<br />

care based on the smaller variation conveyed in the adjust R2. 1 Voice<br />

has the least explanatory power and it is especially limited for<br />

immunization coverage. The panel on voice and accountability<br />

suggests why. The highly variable relationship especially among the<br />

countries with the lowest governance scores makes any effort to<br />

explain variation unconvincing. In higher performing countries<br />

more convergence occurs for government effectiveness and control<br />

of corruption but much less so for voice. Immunization programs<br />

are typically the responsibility of central governments because it is<br />

a preventive measure for which demand tends to be low among all<br />

but the most educated. 2 The dispersion in the voice and accountability<br />

panel is consistent with that fact.<br />

Table 1 provides OLS results showing the strength of governance<br />

measures on measles immunization coverage controlling for<br />

other relevant factors. Of the various governance indices, government<br />

effectiveness explains more of the differences in measles<br />

immunization and has a slightly stronger effect than the overall

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!