25.10.2014 Views

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 Fighting the Diseases of Poverty<br />

capital. Wealthy countries have the best education. An informal<br />

survey of fellow immigrants suggests that many of the most<br />

talented people from poorer countries end up in the universities and<br />

research establishments of the richer nations not only because they<br />

expect a higher quality of education but because they anticipate job<br />

opportunities that will better use their education and talents. In<br />

1993, for instance, ten of the richest (and most well-educated) countries<br />

accounted for 84 per cent of global research and development<br />

and controlled more than 80 per cent of the patents acquired in the<br />

United States and in developing countries (UNDP, 1999).<br />

Freer trade contributes directly to greater economic growth,<br />

helps disseminate new technologies, and creates competitive pressures<br />

to invent and innovate (Goklany, 1995). As an example, trade<br />

accelerated the cleanup of automobile emissions in the United<br />

States because the threat of cleaner cars from imports advanced the<br />

introduction of catalytic converters in the 1970s (Barbour, 1980;<br />

Seskin, 1978).<br />

By expanding competition, trade helps contain the costs of basic<br />

infrastructure, including water supply and sanitation systems. A<br />

vivid example of the importance of trade in improving human wellbeing<br />

comes from Iraq. Because of trade sanctions, it was unable to<br />

properly operate and maintain its water, sanitation, and electricity<br />

systems, resulting in significant public health problems (United<br />

Nations, 200?).<br />

Trade also helps augment food supplies. In fact, between 2000<br />

and 2002, international trade allowed developing countries to<br />

enhance their grain supplies by 11.6 per cent (FAO, 2005). 21 The corresponding<br />

figure for Sub-Saharan Africa was 23.5 per cent. Thus, in<br />

the absence of trade, food prices would have been higher (which<br />

would have priced more poor people out of the market), and hunger<br />

and malnutrition would have been more prevalent in developing<br />

countries. Also, cultivation of marginal lands would probably have<br />

increased to narrow the shortfall between food supply and demand.<br />

In terms of income alone, trade raises incomes for both the poor<br />

and the rich (Dollar & Kraay, 2000; Frankel & Romer, 1999). Dollar

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!