25.10.2014 Views

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 Fighting the Diseases of Poverty<br />

data, and measurements vary, as do level of provider, number of<br />

observations within each provider unit and location. Chaudhury, et<br />

al., (2004) use a single surprise visit to a nationally representative<br />

sample of rural clinics in 5 countries; Banerjee, Deaton and Duflo<br />

(2004) tracked absences in 143 government facilities in Udaipar<br />

district in Rajasthan, India based on weekly visits over 18 months;<br />

Lewis, LaForgia and Sulvetta (1996) used time and motion studies<br />

during a two weeks period to track health provider attendance in a<br />

single hospital in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; and, McPake<br />

et al. (1999) directly observed clinics in 10 rural districts in Uganda<br />

over the course of one week. Thus the reported absences are<br />

captured using different time frames, samples and providers.<br />

Absenteeism rates, measured in these particular studies, range<br />

from a low in Mozambique and Papua New Guinea of 19 per cent to<br />

over 60 per cent among physicians in a Dominican hospital, in rural<br />

Bangladesh and Uganda, but cluster around 35–40 per cent for the<br />

others. These results suggest a serious gap in health service<br />

coverage due to absent staff, levels considerably above those from<br />

similar studies in the same countries for teachers (Chaudhury et al.,<br />

2004). As in Figure 2, these results rely on different types of surveys<br />

over varying time periods and for a variety of services. What is noteworthy<br />

are the range of methods, the lack of consistency and the<br />

need to establish acceptable and regular means for tracking staff<br />

absenteeism. Otherwise it will remain an ad hoc approach.<br />

Lewis, La Forgia and Sulvetta’s (1992; 1996) time and motion<br />

studies in inpatient, outpatient, surgery and emergency found that<br />

not only did physicians only provide 12 per cent of contracted time,<br />

nurses provided virtually no care outside of inpatient services, and<br />

staff physicians, residents and interns provided only 7, 4, and 8 per<br />

cent of their contracted time, respectively. As found in Uganda (see<br />

below), absenteeism was lowest during the early morning hours<br />

and in the outpatient department. In the DR, surgery was only conducted<br />

before noon during the availability of surgeons, leaving the<br />

facility idle for the remainder of the 24 hour day. Interns, residents<br />

and auxiliary nurses received virtually no supervision from staff

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!