25.11.2014 Views

Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs - Wayeb

Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs - Wayeb

Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs - Wayeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kettunen & Helmke 2011<br />

Appendices<br />

APPENDIX I: SYNHARMONIC VS. DISHARMONIC SPELLING, UNDERSPELLED SOUNDS, AND<br />

RECONSTRUCTED GLOTTAL FRICATIVES IN MAYA HIEROGLYPHIC WRITING<br />

The following is primarily based on the foundation work done by Hous<strong>to</strong>n, Robertson, and Stuart (1998, 2000),<br />

Lacadena and Wichmann (2004), and Lacadena and Zender (2001). All possible misinterpretations are ours, not<br />

theirs.<br />

EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS:<br />

C<br />

V<br />

ABS<br />

ERG<br />

consonant<br />

vowel<br />

absolutive<br />

ergative<br />

Since the pivotal study of phoneticism in <strong>Maya</strong> hieroglyphic writing by Knorozov (1952) until the latter part of<br />

1990’s, the existence of disharmony (disharmonic spelling arrangements) in the <strong>Maya</strong> script was noticed but left<br />

more or less as an open question. In 1980’s, the issue was taken under scrutiny by linguists, and some promising<br />

results were achieved.<br />

However, no overall satisfying pattern was found <strong>to</strong> explain all the arrangements until late 1990’s and during the<br />

past few years. In 1998 Hous<strong>to</strong>n, Robertson and Stuart proposed that the disharmonic spellings in the <strong>Maya</strong> script<br />

indicate the presence of preconsonantal glottal fricatives (/h/) as well as complex vowels including: long vowels<br />

(VV), glottal s<strong>to</strong>ps (’), glottalized vowels (V’) and rearticulated glottalized vowels (V’V).<br />

In their original proposal, Hous<strong>to</strong>n, Stuart, and Robertson (1998) suggested that there is no distinction made<br />

between vowel length, glottalization, and preconsonantal /h/ by means of disharmonic spellings, and that the<br />

existence of these three phonemic features are <strong>to</strong> be reconstructed his<strong>to</strong>rically:<br />

CV1C / CV1-CV1 ><br />

CV1C / CV1-CV2 ><br />

CV1C<br />

CVVC<br />

CV’C<br />

CVhC<br />

+ his<strong>to</strong>rical reconstruction<br />

A later modification by Lacadena and Wichmann (2004) pointed <strong>to</strong>ward an interpretation that complex vowels<br />

(complex syllable nuclei) “were distinguished from short vowels in the script [… and] that vowel length and<br />

glottal s<strong>to</strong>ps were clearly distinguished from one another in the orthography”. Lacadena and Wichmann (2004:<br />

103) also proposed that “neither disharmonic nor harmonic spellings indicate a preconsonantal /h/”. While the<br />

preconsonantal /h/ existed in Classic <strong>Maya</strong> (e.g. as a necessary and integral part of passive verbal constructions,<br />

see below), in the process of decipherment it must be reconstructed on the basis of his<strong>to</strong>rical linguistics.<br />

The rules governing harmonic and disharmonic spelling arrangements as modified by Lacadena and Wichmann<br />

(2004) are as follows:<br />

CV1C / CV1-CV1 > CV1C<br />

CV1C / CV1-CV2 > CVVC (V1 = a, e, o, u; V2 = i)<br />

CV1C / CV1-CV2 > CVVC (V1 = i; V2 = a)<br />

CV1C / CV1-CV2 > CV’(V)C (V1 = e, o, u; V2 = a)<br />

CV1C / CV1-CV2 > CV’(V)C (V1 = a, i; V2 = u)<br />

63/154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!