25.11.2014 Views

Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs - Wayeb

Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs - Wayeb

Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs - Wayeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kettunen & Helmke 2011<br />

Appendices<br />

TRANSITIVE VERBS: (CVC)<br />

(1) ACTIVE: ERG-CVC-V1w-ABS<br />

In the active voice, the agent is the subject of the verb, whereas the patient is the object of the verb.<br />

u-chu-ku-wa<br />

uchukuw<br />

u-chuk-uw-Ø<br />

“he/she seized…”<br />

Example:<br />

uchukuw Aj Ukul? Yaxuun Bahlam<br />

“Yaxuun Bahlam seized Aj Ukul”<br />

In the active voice of transitive verbs the root is preceded by the third-person pronoun u- (“he/she/it”), and<br />

followed by the syllabic sign wa which points <strong>to</strong> the -Vw thematic suffix for active transitive constructions. The -<br />

Vw represents a vowel resonating the vowel of the verbal root; examples: u-chok-ow (“he/she threw it”); u-tz’apaw<br />

(“he/she inserted/planted it”); and u-but’-uw (“he/she buried it”). However, in the <strong>Maya</strong> script the graphemic<br />

suffix of transitive verbs in active voice is constantly marked with a wa syllabogram regardless of the vowel of<br />

the verbal root 68 .<br />

(2) PASSIVE: CVhC-aj-ABS 69<br />

In the passive voice, the patient becomes the subject of the verb and the agent is either completely removed or<br />

hidden in an oblique (indirect) phrase/clause.<br />

tzu-tza-ja tz’a-pa-ja chu-ka-ja<br />

tzu[h]tzaj tz’a[h]paj chu[h]kaj<br />

tzu[h]tz-aj-Ø tz’a[h]p-aj-Ø chu[h]k-aj-Ø<br />

“(it) was finished” “(it) was planted” “(he/she/it) was seized”<br />

Example:<br />

chuhkaj Aj Ukul? (ukabjiiy Yaxuun? Bahlam)<br />

“Aj Ukul? was seized (by the doing of Yaxuun? Bahlam)”<br />

68<br />

It seems reasonable <strong>to</strong> argue that the thematic suffix for active transitive constructions is –Vw rather than –V’w, although Lacadena and<br />

Wichmann (2005: 32) state that “[t]he glottal is not straightforwardly reconstructible, but we do note that Chontal has a glottal in its corresponding<br />

morpheme –e’. This suffix could have developed from –V1’w by a replacement of the harmonic vowel with e and by a loss of the w. Even if a glottal<br />

s<strong>to</strong>p in the thematic suffix is not reconstructed for pro<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Maya</strong>n there is still a possibility that it could have been present in pro<strong>to</strong>-Ch’olan as an<br />

innovation in this group.” In the current volume the thematic suffix for active transitive constructions is marked as –Vw and thus contradicting<br />

the harmony rules by Lacadena and Wichmann (see Appendix J). It should be noted here that these harmony rules do not seem <strong>to</strong> apply<br />

uniformly <strong>to</strong> all verbal cases, along with several other parts of speech. Ancient scribes were – and modern epigraphers are – faced with a challenge<br />

in the absence of the wu syllabogram which is needed if a word ending in –uw is <strong>to</strong> be rendered (based on harmony rules by Lacadena and<br />

Wichmann). Consequently, these harmony rules are far from being seamless. It appears as if the <strong>Maya</strong> scribes only employed a limited set of final<br />

syllabograms without specifically indicating complexity in the root vowel (or any preceding vowel). Statistically, these final syllabograms tend <strong>to</strong><br />

take primarily /a/, /i/, or /e/ vowels (–Va, –Vi , and –Ve), and particularly the first two, with /o/ and /u/ (–Vo and –Vu), being infrequent.<br />

Consequently, it seems that disharmonic spelling by itself does not necessarily denote vowel complexity, and nor does synharmonic spelling<br />

always indicate short vowels. The <strong>Maya</strong> writing system in general is not a sterile and mechanical apparatus (no more than any other writing<br />

system in the world) and it should not be forced <strong>to</strong> fit a fixed pattern of linguistic theory (Kettunen 2009, 2010).<br />

69<br />

Note that the (reconstructed) infixed -h- is the true passivizer, and the -aj suffix is solely thematic and derivational (detransitivizer).<br />

67/154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!