Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie
Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie
Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.3.4 Predicted Effects of Climate Change on Forests<br />
Predictions of the effect of modified temperature and rainfall in the Mid-Atlantic region of the<br />
United States include possible major changes in the mix of forest tree species (Subak 2000); in particular,<br />
maple–beech–birch forests may decline and be replaced by oak–hickory forests. Subak (2000) suggests<br />
that combined changes in climate and vegetation will negatively affect migratory bird habitats and<br />
contribute to a general decline in bird community diversity in our region. The forecast for the Great Lakes<br />
region (Sousounis and Glick 2000) similarly predicts that warmer summers may cause reduction or loss<br />
of some conifer and broadleaf tree species in Great Lakes forests. Sousounis and Glick (2000) also<br />
indicate that animal species dependent upon specific habitats (migratory wood warblers) may suffer<br />
declines, especially in the upper Great Lakes states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota. Michigan and<br />
Minnesota are expected to possibly lose more than 50% of their wood warbler species. Warmer and<br />
wetter climate expected across the Great Lakes region, coupled with CO 2 enrichment, may lead to<br />
increased yields of some crops through 2050, followed by declines from 2051 to 2100 in the southern<br />
Great Lakes (Sousounis and Glick 2000). This report suggests (and the authors of this plan concur) that<br />
research is needed on the ability of vegetation communities to respond to global warming, and how the<br />
dynamic of land use and management will interact with climate change. Sousounis and Glick (2000)<br />
specifically recommend that adaptive management strategies should be used with forestry and land<br />
management, and that tree planting and crop operations should select plant varieties more adaptable to<br />
our changing climate.<br />
At least one authoritative research investigation has already been carried out to gauge which local<br />
tree species will likely decline with continuing climate change, and which species are likely to increase.<br />
Iverson and Prasad (1998) used geographic information systems (GIS) to combine predictions for future<br />
temperature and precipitation (from several different global climate models) with county-specific Forest<br />
Inventory Analysis (FIA) data and local soils, land use, and elevation data to evaluate potential population<br />
shifts for 80 different tree species in the eastern United States. Their model provides specific predictions<br />
of future changes in the distribution of tree species for over 2000 counties east of the 100th meridian,<br />
including <strong>Erie</strong> and Crawford Counties.<br />
Iverson and Prasad's (1998) models predicts that many of the most important native tree species in<br />
the study area will have their "ecological optima" shift at least 100 km (62 mi) to the north. Declines in<br />
the study area are predicted for sugar maple, American beech, eastern hemlock, white pine, yellow birch,<br />
red maple, and others. The models predict that several tree species that currently have a more southern<br />
distribution, such as sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and chinkapin oak (Quercus muehlenbergii),<br />
will shift northward into the greater study area (Iverson and Prasad 1998). One of the more disturbing<br />
implications of these predictions is the likely impact of diminished numbers of hemlock and white pine<br />
on the study area's coniferous and mixed forests, which have already been reduced by selective harvesting<br />
and are critically important for wildlife habitat (PGC 2005) and water-quality protection.<br />
7 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES AND PUBLIC INTERACTION WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA<br />
LAKE ERIE WATERSHED<br />
7.1. Recognized Recreational Resources<br />
As noted above in this document (see chapter 1), surveys of the study area's residents conducted by<br />
LERC in 2002 and 2003 as part of the present project indicate a general satisfaction with the region's<br />
many and varied recreational opportunities. This speaks well of the accessibility and quality of the study<br />
area's waters and related land-based resources, but also underscores the importance that these natural<br />
resources be protected from unsustainable development and the pollution that accompanies it. Responses<br />
made by study area residents surveyed in 2003 regarding outdoor recreational interests are graphically<br />
represented in Figure 7.1. Picnicking (92%), motor boating (88%), swimming (87%), and fishing (86%)<br />
are the activities showing the highest satisfaction ratings among those surveyed, closely followed by<br />
non-motor boating, hunting, bicycling, and hiking in equal percentages (85%).<br />
136