26.12.2014 Views

Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie

Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie

Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.3.4 Predicted Effects of Climate Change on Forests<br />

Predictions of the effect of modified temperature and rainfall in the Mid-Atlantic region of the<br />

United States include possible major changes in the mix of forest tree species (Subak 2000); in particular,<br />

maple–beech–birch forests may decline and be replaced by oak–hickory forests. Subak (2000) suggests<br />

that combined changes in climate and vegetation will negatively affect migratory bird habitats and<br />

contribute to a general decline in bird community diversity in our region. The forecast for the Great Lakes<br />

region (Sousounis and Glick 2000) similarly predicts that warmer summers may cause reduction or loss<br />

of some conifer and broadleaf tree species in Great Lakes forests. Sousounis and Glick (2000) also<br />

indicate that animal species dependent upon specific habitats (migratory wood warblers) may suffer<br />

declines, especially in the upper Great Lakes states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota. Michigan and<br />

Minnesota are expected to possibly lose more than 50% of their wood warbler species. Warmer and<br />

wetter climate expected across the Great Lakes region, coupled with CO 2 enrichment, may lead to<br />

increased yields of some crops through 2050, followed by declines from 2051 to 2100 in the southern<br />

Great Lakes (Sousounis and Glick 2000). This report suggests (and the authors of this plan concur) that<br />

research is needed on the ability of vegetation communities to respond to global warming, and how the<br />

dynamic of land use and management will interact with climate change. Sousounis and Glick (2000)<br />

specifically recommend that adaptive management strategies should be used with forestry and land<br />

management, and that tree planting and crop operations should select plant varieties more adaptable to<br />

our changing climate.<br />

At least one authoritative research investigation has already been carried out to gauge which local<br />

tree species will likely decline with continuing climate change, and which species are likely to increase.<br />

Iverson and Prasad (1998) used geographic information systems (GIS) to combine predictions for future<br />

temperature and precipitation (from several different global climate models) with county-specific Forest<br />

Inventory Analysis (FIA) data and local soils, land use, and elevation data to evaluate potential population<br />

shifts for 80 different tree species in the eastern United States. Their model provides specific predictions<br />

of future changes in the distribution of tree species for over 2000 counties east of the 100th meridian,<br />

including <strong>Erie</strong> and Crawford Counties.<br />

Iverson and Prasad's (1998) models predicts that many of the most important native tree species in<br />

the study area will have their "ecological optima" shift at least 100 km (62 mi) to the north. Declines in<br />

the study area are predicted for sugar maple, American beech, eastern hemlock, white pine, yellow birch,<br />

red maple, and others. The models predict that several tree species that currently have a more southern<br />

distribution, such as sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and chinkapin oak (Quercus muehlenbergii),<br />

will shift northward into the greater study area (Iverson and Prasad 1998). One of the more disturbing<br />

implications of these predictions is the likely impact of diminished numbers of hemlock and white pine<br />

on the study area's coniferous and mixed forests, which have already been reduced by selective harvesting<br />

and are critically important for wildlife habitat (PGC 2005) and water-quality protection.<br />

7 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES AND PUBLIC INTERACTION WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA<br />

LAKE ERIE WATERSHED<br />

7.1. Recognized Recreational Resources<br />

As noted above in this document (see chapter 1), surveys of the study area's residents conducted by<br />

LERC in 2002 and 2003 as part of the present project indicate a general satisfaction with the region's<br />

many and varied recreational opportunities. This speaks well of the accessibility and quality of the study<br />

area's waters and related land-based resources, but also underscores the importance that these natural<br />

resources be protected from unsustainable development and the pollution that accompanies it. Responses<br />

made by study area residents surveyed in 2003 regarding outdoor recreational interests are graphically<br />

represented in Figure 7.1. Picnicking (92%), motor boating (88%), swimming (87%), and fishing (86%)<br />

are the activities showing the highest satisfaction ratings among those surveyed, closely followed by<br />

non-motor boating, hunting, bicycling, and hiking in equal percentages (85%).<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!