10.6 Methodology for Identifying Properties for Protection On order to locate properties within the watershed for strategic planning, GIS may be used to define areas where desirable natural resources or protected lands already exist, or are lacking. Figure 10.4 provides an example of how selected criteria may be used (for this example in MA 1A) to highlight the locations of specific parcels which might be viable candidates for acquisition or purchasing of conservation easements. It is envisioned that GIS-based preliminary screening would be followed by interviews of owners of each candidate property to determine owner interest in securing protection for their aquatic and natural resources. If several high value properties become available simultaneously at a time when protection funding is limited, a quantitative scoring tool would provide an objective means of prioritizing parcels according to the merits of measureable characteristics. Different kinds of scoring criteria are already utilized by the <strong>Erie</strong> County Agricultural Land Preservation Board (ECALPB) and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) for the Agricultural <strong>Conservation</strong> Easement Program and <strong>Erie</strong> Access Improvement Program, respectively. A model parcel scoring tool has been developed (Appendix D) that utilizes key components of the ECALPB and PFBC scoring tools, plus additional criteria identified in the rivers conservation plan as valuable attributes for protection. This scoring tool has been approved by the LERC Board for that organization to use when evaluating properties that it considers for protection or acquisition. Any organization that seeks to advance protection projects is welcome to use this tool, or modify it to suit other purposes. The scoring system presented in Appendix D was designed to permit reasonably rapid evaluation, using information accessible in publicly available GIS databases, aerial photography, and topographic maps, in addition to a modestly detailed interview with an agreeable property owner. It should be noted that DCNR and other agencies would require public access as a primary characteristic of any lands for which public funds would be used to secure protection. Table 10.3 Outreach Actions Proposed for the Pennsylvania Lake <strong>Erie</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> Portion MAs Main Subwatersheds Potential Lead Groups Municipalities Involved Possible Partners Priority & Completion Date O1: Conduct outreach meetings with stakeholders to present major findings and recommendations of the Rivers <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, to identify partners and roles for implementation, coordinated with Act 167 Phase 2 planning and/or other water-related regional planning activities. Central Group 1B, 2B, 3B Fourmile, Mill, Cascade, Walnut, Trout Run, Elk (NE edge) LERC Green, Summitt, Mckean, Millcreek, Fairview Townships, City of <strong>Erie</strong>, Lawrence Park, Wesleyville DCNR, ECCD, PLEWA, PA Sea Grant, and others Very High Oct 2008 Conneaut Creek 1DE, 1DWE, 1DS, 1DWW, 1AM, 2D, 2DWB Conneaut LERC Conneaut, Elk Creek, Beaver, Spring, Conneaut (Crawford Cy), Summerhill, Summit Townships, Albion, Cranesville, Springboro, Conneautville DCNR, ECCD, CCCD, PLEWA Very High Sept 2008 Elk Creek 1C, 2C, 1HQ Elk Creek, Godfrey Run, Trout Run LERC McKean, Franklin, Elk Creek, Washington, Fairview, Girard Townships, Fairview and Girard DCNR, ECCD, PLEWA Very High Oct 2008 Eastern Group 1A, 2A, 3A Twentymile, Sixteenmile, Twelvemile, Eightmile, Sevenmile, Sixmile LERC Greenfield, Harborcreek, North East Townships, North East DCNR, ECCD, PLEWA Very High Nov 2008 170
<strong>Watershed</strong> Portion MAs Main Subwatersheds Potential Lead Groups Municipalities Involved Possible Partners Priority & Completion Date Western Shore 3C, 1W Lake <strong>Erie</strong> Direct, Godfrey Run, Kelly's Run, Elk (near mouth), Duck Run, Crooked, Raccoon, Turkey LERC Girard, Springfield Townships, Lake City DCNR, ECCD, PLEWA Very High Nov 2008 O2: Conduct outreach workshops with stakeholders regarding the importance of protecting headwaters, forests, and wetlands; provide information about conservation easements, BMPs, and programs providing funding or other assistance All All: 2 workshops (east and west) All PA Sea Grant, ECCD, CCCD All LERC, PLEWA, NRCS, DEP, and others Very High by 2010 O3: Conduct outreach workshops with stakeholders on sustainable lawn care and gardening practices, highlighting the potential impact of chemicals on aquatic resources, wildlife, and human health; provide practical guidance on sustainable lawn, garden, and farm management and applicable BMPs All All: 2 workshops (east and west) All Cooperative Extension <strong>Erie</strong> & Crawford Counties, ECCD, CCCD All PA Sea Grant, Presque Isle Audubon Society, Master Gardeners, Master Well Owner Network, and others High by 2012 O4: Conduct outreach workshops to prospective business and home owners, municipal officers, and developers about the importance of sustainable development for aquatic and natural resources; provide training on Smart Growth principles and practical guidance for implementation of conservation design as the new standard for development in suburban areas. All All, especially 3A, 3B, 3C, 2B, 1B, 1HQ, 2C, 1C All PA Sea Grant, LERC, ECCD All PLEWA High by 2012 O5: Conduct outreach workshops for school teachers and environmental educators regarding the utilization of local scenic streams, forests, and wetlands to increase public awareness of nature and conservation principles, and generate community support and ownership of the resources. All All All LEA Earth Force, local colleges & universities, PLEWA, ECCD All PA Sea Grant, DCNR, School Districts, Nature Centers Very High by 2010 O6: Conduct outreach workshops for school teachers and historical education organizations regarding the utilization of stream-associated historical resources (former mill and canal sites, etc.) to increase public awareness of the significance of these resources, and generate community support to improve historical education and preservation programs. All All All ECHS, local colleges & universities All PLEWA, LEA Earth Force, Historical Museums and Centers High by 2012 O7: Conduct outreach workshops to government agency, and municipal leaders, as well as key leaders of organizations that manage resources likely affected by climate change (Port Authority, Water Authority, marina operators, fish and game managers, etc.) regarding the anticipated impact of future climate change on water-related community infrastructure and associated economic issues. Provide guidance on all available means to mitigate for the adverse effects of climate change, in addition to models of how other communities, organizations, and infrastructure management agencies are planning to adapt to climate change. 171
- Page 1:
Pennsylvania Rivers Conservation Pr
- Page 4 and 5:
land to development. Strong communi
- Page 6 and 7:
Human resources available to facili
- Page 8 and 9:
other communities, organizations, a
- Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .
- Page 13 and 14:
8.3 Sustainable Development and Gov
- Page 15 and 16:
Figure 5.14. Average summer phospho
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 10.3. Management Areas propo
- Page 19:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PLAN AUTHORSHIP
- Page 22 and 23:
working with interested teacher and
- Page 24 and 25:
Figure 1.3. Perceived importance of
- Page 26 and 27:
1.3 Watershed Plan Focus The primar
- Page 28 and 29:
Figure 2.2. Detail of the south-cen
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 2.4. Physiographic provinces
- Page 32 and 33:
westward. Although the paucity of f
- Page 34 and 35:
via the Erigan River, a major river
- Page 36 and 37:
Warren and Whittlesey can be found
- Page 38 and 39:
evised paleoenvironmental picture,
- Page 40 and 41:
characteristic ground stone tools,
- Page 42 and 43:
phase represent the most common Lat
- Page 44 and 45:
including flexed and extended inhum
- Page 46 and 47:
with the appearance of European tra
- Page 48 and 49:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wa
- Page 50 and 51:
of $800 for the purchase of The Tri
- Page 52 and 53:
In addition to these townships, the
- Page 54 and 55:
Pittsburgh Railroad had reached New
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3.3. Density of registered a
- Page 58:
the Whittlesey and Warren III stran
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 3.3. Properties in the Study
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 3.3—continued Name Address
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 3.3—continued Name Address
- Page 67 and 68:
"Little Ice Age"), and the validity
- Page 69 and 70:
"massasaugies" (Eastern Massasauga
- Page 71 and 72:
eport (Col. John Fleeharty) lamente
- Page 73 and 74:
flowing streams. The starting point
- Page 75 and 76:
elow the park." Apparently the pump
- Page 77 and 78:
A submerged arching sand feature is
- Page 79 and 80:
of the lake plain and upland areas
- Page 81 and 82:
characteristics, and are important
- Page 83 and 84:
Lake section (see Figure 2.4). Nota
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 5.2. Flow time series for Tw
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5.4. Flow time series for Co
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 5.8. Flow per square mile pe
- Page 91 and 92:
area that have thicker glacial depo
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 5.4. Protected Water Uses for
- Page 95 and 96:
Stream Zone County 3—East Branch
- Page 97 and 98:
5.10.2 Permitted Discharges The two
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 5.14. Average summer phospho
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 5.15. Graphical analyses of
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 5.17. Average summer nitrate
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 5.19. Mercury concentrations
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 5.20. Map showing locations
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 5.22. Number of stream miles
- Page 111 and 112:
91 Figure 5.24. Results of Campbell
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 5.6. Range in Number of E. co
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 5.26. Maximum E. coli counts
- Page 117 and 118:
The recent investigation completed
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 5.30. Sources of known nondo
- Page 121 and 122:
6 NATURAL RESOURCES 6.1 Animal Life
- Page 123 and 124:
Rank Status Taxon Common Name Globa
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 6.2. Pennsylvania Vertebrate
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 6.3. Noted Occurrence of Spaw
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 6.4. Water quality designati
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 6.6. Fishing hours spent on
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure 6.7. Comparative analysis of
- Page 135 and 136:
Figure 6.9. Percentage breakdown of
- Page 137 and 138:
A small number of the birds listed
- Page 139 and 140: phytoplankton by Dreissena allows l
- Page 141 and 142: populations increase. Corbicula flu
- Page 143 and 144: Rank Status Taxon Common name Globa
- Page 145 and 146: Rank Status Taxon Common name Globa
- Page 147 and 148: Two other forest wetland plant comm
- Page 149 and 150: 6.2.4 Emergent Wetlands Over half o
- Page 151 and 152: alleghaniensis), sugar maple, red m
- Page 153 and 154: Table 6.6.Percentage Composition of
- Page 155 and 156: Figure 6.18. Detail of the largest
- Page 157 and 158: Figure 7.1. Responses made by study
- Page 159 and 160: Figure 7.3. Spatial distribution of
- Page 161 and 162: Presque Isle State Park is connecte
- Page 163 and 164: Table 7.2. Number of Recreational O
- Page 165 and 166: lakefront recreational properties,
- Page 167 and 168: Map Id Subwatershed Comment 51 41.5
- Page 169 and 170: Bayfront Center for Maritime Studie
- Page 171 and 172: Other watershed associations or wat
- Page 173 and 174: Figure 8.1. Child poverty rates in
- Page 175 and 176: comprehensive vision or plan, have
- Page 177 and 178: and municipalities should be encour
- Page 179 and 180: 5. In order to sustain maximum biod
- Page 181 and 182: 10 PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIES FOR AC
- Page 183 and 184: easements for riparian areas, and p
- Page 185 and 186: Table 10.2 Management Areas Defined
- Page 187 and 188: Figure 10.2. Example of how GIS can
- Page 189: Figure 10.4. Example of how GIS can
- Page 193 and 194: Restoration actions Management Area
- Page 195 and 196: 11 REFERENCES CITED Abrams, M. D. 2
- Page 197 and 198: Broyles, B. J. 1971 Second Prelimin
- Page 199 and 200: Cooper, N. L., J. R. Bidwell, and D
- Page 201 and 202: Dzurko, Robert 1972 Conneaut Creek
- Page 203 and 204: Goodyear, A. C. 1999 The Early Holo
- Page 205 and 206: Jasim, S. Y., A. Irabelli, L. Schwe
- Page 207 and 208: Leighton, R. 2006 Pennsylvania Fish
- Page 209 and 210: Michaels, A. 2005 Pennsylvania Has
- Page 211 and 212: 2007d Waterways, Wetlands, and Eros
- Page 213 and 214: Richardson, J. B., and J. B. Peters
- Page 215 and 216: Soon, W. and S. Baliunas 2003 Proxy
- Page 217 and 218: Tomikel and Shepps 1967 Trasande, L
- Page 219: Whitley, D. S., and R. I. Dorn 1993
- Page 223 and 224: Preparing For Watershed Conservatio
- Page 225 and 226: Introduction (cont’d) In March of
- Page 227 and 228: Executive Summary Overall, responde
- Page 229 and 230: Executive Summary (cont’d) Cont
- Page 231 and 232: Summary Of Key Groups (cont’d) Ur
- Page 233 and 234: Please Indicate Whether You Agree,
- Page 235 and 236: In Your Opinion, Is The Need For Im
- Page 237 and 238: If You Had To Choose Between Proper
- Page 239 and 240: Favorite Locations For Recreation I
- Page 241 and 242:
Favorite Motor Boating Locations To
- Page 243 and 244:
Favorite Hiking Locations Location
- Page 245 and 246:
Favorite Swimming Locations Total R
- Page 247 and 248:
Knowledge Of Historic And Prehistor
- Page 249:
Support For Stream Protection Measu
- Page 253 and 254:
LERC Rivers Conservation Plan Publi
- Page 255 and 256:
• Mason: As far as education, get
- Page 257:
• Kloss: Educate people about Act
- Page 261 and 262:
Great Lakes Commission http://www.g
- Page 263:
Center for Economic and Environment
- Page 267 and 268:
The Erie County portion of the Penn
- Page 269 and 270:
Feature Parameters Parameter Variab
- Page 271 and 272:
Feature Parameters Parameter Variab