How Satisfied Are You With The Opportunities Available In <strong>Erie</strong> County For Recreational Activities Listed Below N=474 ! Picnicking had the highest satisfaction rate at 91.6%. ! Off-roading had the lowest satisfaction rate at 45.9%, but it also had the highest unsure response at 34.5%. Picnicking Outdoor photography Horseback riding Hunting Camping Off-roading Wildlife viewing Birdwatching Hiking Biking 46 57 13 76 72 92 4 4 83 3 4 30 8 16 15 13 20 35 81 7 11 85 3 12 ! Overall residents are satisfied with the available recreational opportunities in <strong>Erie</strong> County. Jetskiing Boating (no motor) Boating (motor) 85 132 85 12 3 76 7 17 85 4 11 882 10 Swimming Fishing 87 10 3 86 3 11 Percent Statisfied/Very Satisfied Percent Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied Percent Unsure Rivers <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Grant--Public Opinion Survey Page 24 If You Indicated That You Were Dissatisfied Or Very Dissatisfied With Opportunities Available For One Or More Of The Recreational Activities Listed, What Could Be Done To Make It More Satisfying Total Responses = 264 Responses with 3 or more respondents: Other Responses Given: ! More opportunities for “camping at state or local parks” was the most popular response wth 20 respondents or 7.6% of total responses. ! 5.3% of respondents (14) wanted “more areas for bicyclng.” ! 14 respondents wanted “more ATV tracks.” ! “More areas for hiking” are desired by 10 respondents. ! 3.0% of respondents (8) would like “more trails.” ! 8 respondents want “more opportunities for horseback riding.” ! “More publicity for nature opportunities” was suggested by 3.0% of the respondents. ! 7 respondents feel that people should “respect property owners’ privacy ! “More regulations of off-roading” was suggested by 2.7% of respondents (7). ! 7 respondents desired “pollution control in swimming areas.” ! “More areas” constituted 2.7% of responses (7) given. ! 2.3% of respondents (6) want “better bicycling conditions.” ! 5 respondents think that “too much motor boating” is a problem. ! “Unenforced regulations” comprised 1.9% of responses given (5). ! By “keeping the noise down” 1.5% of respondents (4) feel that recreation could be improved. ! 4 respondents feel the need to “eliminate jet skis.” ! “More areas for walking” are desired by 4 respondents. ! 4 respondents replied “open more land for hunting.” ! 1.5% of respondents (4) want “better trails.” ! “More activities” constituted 1.5% of responses given (4). ! 3 respondents think that chemical contamination of fish is a problem. ! “Dead fish in water” was a problem cited by 1.1% of respondents (3). ! 3 respondents want “more opportunities for environmental eduaction.” ! Recreation can be improved by “less regulation” according to 3 respondents. ! 1.1% of respondents want to “limit jet ski use.” ! Two Responses: More areas for non-motor boating, more areas for wildlife viewing, no bicycling on highways, boats cause pollution, jeeps destroy land, less cost to indviduals, reopen Lake Pleasant for swimming, more advertisements for hiking trails, need a “rails-to-trails” path through <strong>Erie</strong> County, more opportunities south of I-90, education on sharing the road wth bikers, more ATV access, get government involved, attach small fees if necessary, Presque Isle is inhabited by fleas and biting insects, and more parks (like Asbury Woods). ! One Response: Non-native species invasion, do not allow glass containers at beaches, more days for hunting, less opportunities on the Eastside, more areas for rollerblading, stop the fishing license requirement, provide alternatves to the zoo for nature observation, more areas to preserve nature, better care facilites, make bike and walk trails separate on Presque Isle, limit motor boat speeding, more pools, more shoulders built on rural roads, connecting horse trails, more nude beaches, more backpacking areas, less commercial campgrounds, preservation and development of Presque Isle, these people need to get a life (swimming, jet ski, birdwatching), no use for ATVs, free swimming areas at Presque Isle, more riding areas, more wildlife stocking programs, more kayak rentals, nude store “pornopoly,” crime, increase luxury taxes, regulate MPG on recreational vehicles, autos, and watercraft, limit speed of luxury vehicles, center activities in one area, more photography access, less commercial development, less residential development, fix existing homes and businesses, more woods, fields, and piers, better places, more beach access, more lake access, utilize abandoned areas, in favor of private (vs. Public) funding, no coyote hunting, open more private land, get rid of idiot boats, clean up trash, better accountability by operators, walking trails in North East, need bike/walk path on W. 38th St. and Asbury Road to Asbury Woods, flexible PM hours for locations, warmer water temperatures, more boat ramps on Lake <strong>Erie</strong>, more public indoor pools, regulatons on hunting/gun use, fish and game commission should not be given any police powers whatsoever, bring boating events to the area, more pet areas, more pet monitoring, less government involvement, allow dogs in state camping areas, mufflers for ATVs, more picnicking areas, less hunting areas, more fish supplied, more nonlifeguarded swimming allowed, government incentives to private landowners to allow hunting, keep them clean, more safety measures, and improve law enforcement. Rivers <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Grant--Public Opinion Survey Page 25 16
Favorite Locations For Recreation In <strong>Erie</strong> County Favorite Bicycling Locations Total Responses = 209 Location # of Responses Presque Isle 74 Peninsula 28 Neighborhoods 11 <strong>Erie</strong> County 10 Northeast 7 City Streets 5 Route 5 4 Lake <strong>Erie</strong> 4 Trails 3 Location # of Responses Locally 3 McKean Streets 3 County Roads 2 Oil Creek State Park 2 I have my own bike 2 Bayfront 2 Back roads 2 Girard 2 Sidewalks 2 Other bicycling locations that were only listed once include: Route 89, Bulls Dam, Millcreek Summit, West Springfield, Bayside Walk, With grandkids, Not enough biking paths, Don’t have one, Turkey Creek, Raccoon Creek, From home, Gravel Pit Park, Lake Pleasant, Waterford, Home, Own yard, Rails to Trails, East <strong>Erie</strong> County, Edinboro, West County, Too dangerous - too many cars, Sarah’s, Backwoods, Avid MTB, Back and forth to work, Anywhere, Ocassionally - weather permitting, All over, Secondary roads with large berm, Suburban streets, Frontier, Not usually around, State parks, Harborcreek, Dutton Rd., Heimyer Rd., On our road that s not even safe to drive a car on, Our road, Roadways, Lake City, Union City Dam, Fairview, and Franklin. Rivers <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Grant--Public Opinion Survey Page 26 17
- Page 1:
Pennsylvania Rivers Conservation Pr
- Page 4 and 5:
land to development. Strong communi
- Page 6 and 7:
Human resources available to facili
- Page 8 and 9:
other communities, organizations, a
- Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .
- Page 13 and 14:
8.3 Sustainable Development and Gov
- Page 15 and 16:
Figure 5.14. Average summer phospho
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 10.3. Management Areas propo
- Page 19:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PLAN AUTHORSHIP
- Page 22 and 23:
working with interested teacher and
- Page 24 and 25:
Figure 1.3. Perceived importance of
- Page 26 and 27:
1.3 Watershed Plan Focus The primar
- Page 28 and 29:
Figure 2.2. Detail of the south-cen
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 2.4. Physiographic provinces
- Page 32 and 33:
westward. Although the paucity of f
- Page 34 and 35:
via the Erigan River, a major river
- Page 36 and 37:
Warren and Whittlesey can be found
- Page 38 and 39:
evised paleoenvironmental picture,
- Page 40 and 41:
characteristic ground stone tools,
- Page 42 and 43:
phase represent the most common Lat
- Page 44 and 45:
including flexed and extended inhum
- Page 46 and 47:
with the appearance of European tra
- Page 48 and 49:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wa
- Page 50 and 51:
of $800 for the purchase of The Tri
- Page 52 and 53:
In addition to these townships, the
- Page 54 and 55:
Pittsburgh Railroad had reached New
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3.3. Density of registered a
- Page 58:
the Whittlesey and Warren III stran
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 3.3. Properties in the Study
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 3.3—continued Name Address
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 3.3—continued Name Address
- Page 67 and 68:
"Little Ice Age"), and the validity
- Page 69 and 70:
"massasaugies" (Eastern Massasauga
- Page 71 and 72:
eport (Col. John Fleeharty) lamente
- Page 73 and 74:
flowing streams. The starting point
- Page 75 and 76:
elow the park." Apparently the pump
- Page 77 and 78:
A submerged arching sand feature is
- Page 79 and 80:
of the lake plain and upland areas
- Page 81 and 82:
characteristics, and are important
- Page 83 and 84:
Lake section (see Figure 2.4). Nota
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 5.2. Flow time series for Tw
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5.4. Flow time series for Co
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 5.8. Flow per square mile pe
- Page 91 and 92:
area that have thicker glacial depo
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 5.4. Protected Water Uses for
- Page 95 and 96:
Stream Zone County 3—East Branch
- Page 97 and 98:
5.10.2 Permitted Discharges The two
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 5.14. Average summer phospho
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 5.15. Graphical analyses of
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 5.17. Average summer nitrate
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 5.19. Mercury concentrations
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 5.20. Map showing locations
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 5.22. Number of stream miles
- Page 111 and 112:
91 Figure 5.24. Results of Campbell
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 5.6. Range in Number of E. co
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 5.26. Maximum E. coli counts
- Page 117 and 118:
The recent investigation completed
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 5.30. Sources of known nondo
- Page 121 and 122:
6 NATURAL RESOURCES 6.1 Animal Life
- Page 123 and 124:
Rank Status Taxon Common Name Globa
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 6.2. Pennsylvania Vertebrate
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 6.3. Noted Occurrence of Spaw
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 6.4. Water quality designati
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 6.6. Fishing hours spent on
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure 6.7. Comparative analysis of
- Page 135 and 136:
Figure 6.9. Percentage breakdown of
- Page 137 and 138:
A small number of the birds listed
- Page 139 and 140:
phytoplankton by Dreissena allows l
- Page 141 and 142:
populations increase. Corbicula flu
- Page 143 and 144:
Rank Status Taxon Common name Globa
- Page 145 and 146:
Rank Status Taxon Common name Globa
- Page 147 and 148:
Two other forest wetland plant comm
- Page 149 and 150:
6.2.4 Emergent Wetlands Over half o
- Page 151 and 152:
alleghaniensis), sugar maple, red m
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 6.6.Percentage Composition of
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 6.18. Detail of the largest
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 7.1. Responses made by study
- Page 159 and 160:
Figure 7.3. Spatial distribution of
- Page 161 and 162:
Presque Isle State Park is connecte
- Page 163 and 164:
Table 7.2. Number of Recreational O
- Page 165 and 166:
lakefront recreational properties,
- Page 167 and 168:
Map Id Subwatershed Comment 51 41.5
- Page 169 and 170:
Bayfront Center for Maritime Studie
- Page 171 and 172:
Other watershed associations or wat
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 8.1. Child poverty rates in
- Page 175 and 176:
comprehensive vision or plan, have
- Page 177 and 178:
and municipalities should be encour
- Page 179 and 180:
5. In order to sustain maximum biod
- Page 181 and 182:
10 PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIES FOR AC
- Page 183 and 184:
easements for riparian areas, and p
- Page 185 and 186:
Table 10.2 Management Areas Defined
- Page 187 and 188: Figure 10.2. Example of how GIS can
- Page 189 and 190: Figure 10.4. Example of how GIS can
- Page 191 and 192: Watershed Portion MAs Main Subwater
- Page 193 and 194: Restoration actions Management Area
- Page 195 and 196: 11 REFERENCES CITED Abrams, M. D. 2
- Page 197 and 198: Broyles, B. J. 1971 Second Prelimin
- Page 199 and 200: Cooper, N. L., J. R. Bidwell, and D
- Page 201 and 202: Dzurko, Robert 1972 Conneaut Creek
- Page 203 and 204: Goodyear, A. C. 1999 The Early Holo
- Page 205 and 206: Jasim, S. Y., A. Irabelli, L. Schwe
- Page 207 and 208: Leighton, R. 2006 Pennsylvania Fish
- Page 209 and 210: Michaels, A. 2005 Pennsylvania Has
- Page 211 and 212: 2007d Waterways, Wetlands, and Eros
- Page 213 and 214: Richardson, J. B., and J. B. Peters
- Page 215 and 216: Soon, W. and S. Baliunas 2003 Proxy
- Page 217 and 218: Tomikel and Shepps 1967 Trasande, L
- Page 219: Whitley, D. S., and R. I. Dorn 1993
- Page 223 and 224: Preparing For Watershed Conservatio
- Page 225 and 226: Introduction (cont’d) In March of
- Page 227 and 228: Executive Summary Overall, responde
- Page 229 and 230: Executive Summary (cont’d) Cont
- Page 231 and 232: Summary Of Key Groups (cont’d) Ur
- Page 233 and 234: Please Indicate Whether You Agree,
- Page 235 and 236: In Your Opinion, Is The Need For Im
- Page 237: If You Had To Choose Between Proper
- Page 241 and 242: Favorite Motor Boating Locations To
- Page 243 and 244: Favorite Hiking Locations Location
- Page 245 and 246: Favorite Swimming Locations Total R
- Page 247 and 248: Knowledge Of Historic And Prehistor
- Page 249: Support For Stream Protection Measu
- Page 253 and 254: LERC Rivers Conservation Plan Publi
- Page 255 and 256: • Mason: As far as education, get
- Page 257: • Kloss: Educate people about Act
- Page 261 and 262: Great Lakes Commission http://www.g
- Page 263: Center for Economic and Environment
- Page 267 and 268: The Erie County portion of the Penn
- Page 269 and 270: Feature Parameters Parameter Variab
- Page 271 and 272: Feature Parameters Parameter Variab