26.12.2014 Views

Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie

Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie

Watershed Conservation Plan - Destination Erie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

phase represent the most common Late Archaic point series in the eastern Great Lakes region, comprising,<br />

for example, ca. 25% of the diagnostic projectile points recovered during the 1978 survey of <strong>Erie</strong> and<br />

Crawford Counties, Pennsylvania, by the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (Johnson et al. 1979:63). In<br />

the upper Allegheny River drainage, sites with Brewerton points are numerous in all topographic settings,<br />

although they are especially common vis-à-vis other types in upland settings (Johnson et al. 1979:63)—as,<br />

for example, in rockshelters within the Allegheny National Forest (Lantz 1982:40).<br />

The Terminal Archaic (ca. 3650–2950 B.P. [1700–1000 B.C.]) in the Northeast is sometimes delineated<br />

as a separate Transitional phase characterized principally by a series of stemmed projectile points (e.g.,<br />

Koens-Crispin, Lehigh Broad, Perkiomen Broadspear, Susquehanna Broad, Forest Notched, Ashtabula, and<br />

Dry Brook types) noted by Johnson (1990) to be included within an entity variously referred to as the<br />

Susquehanna Soapstone culture (Witthoft 1953), Susquehanna culture/tradition (Ritchie 1965), or<br />

Susquehanna phase of the Broadspear tradition (Kinsey 1972). Diagnostic lithic types such as the<br />

Susquehanna Broad point (Witthoft 1953) often occur in association with steatite (i.e., soapstone) vessels.<br />

Although Koens-Crispin and Perkiomen points occur at Terminal Archaic sites in northwestern<br />

Pennsylvania, Susquehanna Broad and Forest Notched points are often the most common point types for this<br />

period in the drainages of this area. Especially common on the Eastern Lake section of northeastern Ohio and<br />

northwestern Pennsylvania are Ashtabula points (Johnson et al. 1979:69). As witnessed throughout the<br />

Middle Atlantic region, generally (Custer 1984; Geasey and Ballweber 1991; Stewart 1984a, 1984b, 1987,<br />

1989), these Terminal Archaic points are frequently manufactured from nonlocal materials, including<br />

rhyollite (probably from Adams County, Pennsylvania), jasper, and argillite. The presence of such exotic<br />

materials at Transitional Archaic sites is usually interpreted as evidence of interregional exchange linked to<br />

higher population density, more circumscribed territories, and greater social complexity at this time (Raber<br />

et al. 1998:130). George (1991:85; 1998:27), however, argues that the appearance of broad points<br />

manufactured from nonlocal materials may indicate an actual population movement into western<br />

Pennsylvania from the lower Susquehanna River drainage.<br />

3.1.3 Woodland Period<br />

The Early Woodland period (ca. 1000 B.C.–A.D. 1) encompasses a time of significant cultural change<br />

over much of the Northeast and Midwest, with the development of horticulture, semi-permanent and<br />

permanent villages, often elaborate mortuary ceremonialism including the construction of mounds, ossuaries<br />

and formal cemeteries, and more complex and far-reaching trade and exchange systems. By the Early<br />

Woodland, the gradual, intensified procurement of local flora that had begun in the Archaic resulted in the<br />

domestication of most of the members of the suite of plants often referred to as the Eastern Agricultural<br />

Complex—that is, squash, marshelder, goosefoot, sunflower, erect knotweed, maygrass, and little barley<br />

(Dancey 2005:112). This process seems to have begun in the Midwest and Midsouth, in areas drained by the<br />

Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, and Tennessee Rivers (Gremillion 2002). In the Ohio Valley specifically, a<br />

pattern of intensified gathering of plant species leading to their management and eventual domestication in<br />

the context of gardens has been documented (Wymer and Abrams 2003:175). Although relatively few open<br />

habitation sites in the middle and upper Ohio Valley dating to the Early Woodland have provided<br />

paleoethnobotanical data, it seems that in this region native cultigens played only a minor role in subsistence<br />

strategies, augmenting a largely foraging system until Middle Woodland times (Wymer and Abrams<br />

2003:189).<br />

The major technological advance during the Early Woodland was the development of ceramic vessels<br />

for cooking and storage. Although isolated finds of Marcey Creek Plain pottery dating to the Terminal<br />

Archaic are reported for Pennsylvania, and the oldest pottery recovered from Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Half<br />

Moon Cord-marked, dates to ca. 1115 B.C. (Johnson 1982:154), this technology appears to become<br />

widespread in the Commonwealth only after ca. 1000 B.C. These early ceramic vessels are quite similar in<br />

design to the generally earlier steatite vessels, with straight sides, flat bottoms, and lug handles, and both may<br />

have functioned primarily in ritual contexts as containers for stone boiling and food serving (Kent 1980:28;<br />

Klein 1997:143–144). The earliest ceramic wares in adjacent northeastern Ohio include Leimbach Thick,<br />

Leimbach Cordmarked, and Ohio Plain (Mustain et al. 2000:12).<br />

The Early Woodland of the Middle and Upper Ohio Valley, including southern Ohio, northern<br />

Kentucky, southeastern Indiana, western West Virginia, and southwestern Pennsylvania, is generally<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!