03.01.2015 Views

l4sfdrx

l4sfdrx

l4sfdrx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

490 GCHQ GOES GLOBAL<br />

to unlock the code, and without the paraphernalia of a government<br />

courier system, distributing the key safely and without<br />

interception was a problem. However, the mavericks now made<br />

a breakthrough. The most common analogy used to explain it<br />

is a series of padlocks. The sender, who we will call 'Alice',<br />

secures her message to her friend 'Bob' with a cypher that works<br />

like a padlock to which Bob does not have the key. When Bob<br />

receives it, instead of trying to open it, he adds a second padlock<br />

that depends on a cypher of his own devising, and sends it back<br />

to Alice. Alice then removes only her original padlock and sends<br />

it back to Bob, by which time it is only secured by Bob's padlock.<br />

Bob can now open the box and read the message. They have<br />

communicated securely, yet there has been no key distribution. 8<br />

This was a revolutionary breakthrough. The arrival of Public<br />

Key Cryptography triggered a veritable war between civillibertarians<br />

and the code-breaking agencies. For the mavericks, the<br />

possibility of email secrecy and anonymous web activity offered<br />

the prize of a return to the golden age of privacy for the citizen.<br />

For the sigint agencies, the military and the police this conjured<br />

up a world in which criminals, drug dealers and terrorists would<br />

be able to avoid the interception of their communications and<br />

encrypt what was on their computers. The double irony was<br />

that the global telecommunications revolution that had helped<br />

to bring all this about was also placing the sigint agencies under<br />

growing pressure from their own governments to assist with<br />

secure e-commerce. Some time after his retirement, Sir Brian<br />

Tovey, a former Director of GCHQ, explained the dilemma:<br />

*<br />

The question is: how in the world does one reconcile these<br />

two How does one on the one hand assure industry that<br />

its communications are confidential and reliable, and how<br />

on the other hand is Government under these very carefully<br />

defined circumstances to continue to derive important<br />

information, be it about drug running, terrorism et<br />

cetera, from the interception of communications ... <br />

*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!