03.01.2015 Views

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the employment population for the redeveloped NASB as a site-specific analysis<br />

the 2009 employment population for the Towns of Brunswick and Topsham as<br />

both site-specific and areawide analyses<br />

the 2009 employment population for the Brunswick LMA as an areawide<br />

analysis<br />

The TDM measures outlined in Chapter 4 were included under all analysis scenarios;<br />

however, two model inputs were adjusted under the various employment scenarios<br />

to understand the range of TDM reduction that could be achieved. The first model<br />

input tested is the “Employer-Support Programs” level, which the first COMMUTER<br />

model defined as follows:<br />

Level 0: No program<br />

Level 1: Provision of information activities plus a quarter-time transportation<br />

coordinator<br />

Level 2: Level 1 plus in-house matching services for carpool and vanpool, workhours<br />

flexibility, or bicycle parking and shower activities<br />

Level 3: Level 2 plus a half-time transportation coordinator plus preferential<br />

parking for carpool and vanpool, on-site transit pass sales, or secure bicycle<br />

parking and local infrastructure improvements for bicycle travel<br />

Level 4: Level 3 plus a full-time transportation coordinator plus additional<br />

financial and technical support for carpool and vanpool, guaranteed ride home,<br />

or workplace promotional activities<br />

The three population groups considered in the TDM evaluation considered<br />

Employer-Support Program Levels 2 and 4. GOMAINE serves as the transportation<br />

coordinator for the Brunswick/Topsham area; therefore, regardless of whether<br />

individual employers have their own transportation coordinator, the application of<br />

the Level 4 Employer-Support Program is appropriate for the evaluation.<br />

The second COMMUTER model input adjusted for analysis purposes is parking<br />

costs that contemplate higher parking rates charged for single-occupancy vehicles<br />

than for carpool or vanpool vehicles. The two scenarios evaluated to test the<br />

sensitivity of higher parking costs for single-occupancy vehicles included increases of<br />

$1 and $2 per day.<br />

Section 5.2 discusses results of the TDM evaluation for each strategy and option<br />

evaluated.<br />

Conclusions 139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!