Final Report - VHB.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Throughout this Feasibility Study, the terms strategy and option are used to describe different alternatives for achieving the improved access to the redeveloped NASB. The term strategy refers to larger transportation and land-use needs used individually or in combination to achieve better access to the NASB. Different ways of achieving those strategies are considered options. Potential options for a defined strategy may include actions such as the widening of an existing roadway, addition of turn lanes, improved traffic-signal timing, and implementation of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) actions. For this Study, five specific strategies were identified for evaluation. These five strategies were provided to the MaineDOT by the Governor’s Advisory Council and formulated through the previous NASB Reuse Master Plan study efforts conducted by the MRRA. Focusing the evaluation effort on these five strategies ensures that the evaluation is conducted at a sufficient level of detail in order for decision makers to advance some of the preferred options to the permitting, design, and implementation phases. The five strategies or needs are as follows: Provide direct access to US Route 1 from the NASB. Improve mobility along State Route 196 (Coastal Connector) from I-295 (Exit 31) to US Route 1, including the State Route 196/US Route 201 intersection and US Route 201 north to Old Augusta Road. Improve mobility between I-295 (Exit 28) along Pleasant Street and Maine Street in Brunswick to State Route 123. Improve mobility along Mill Street from Pleasant Street in Brunswick to State Route 196. Extend the existing rail spur to the NASB. Whereas many transportation studies speak in terms of a single “Preferred Option,” this Feasibility Study seeks to identify a Preferred Option - perhaps more than one - for each strategy. It is important to understand that one strategy may be forwarded to construction independently of the others. The Preferred Options are prioritized for advancement based on the need to accommodate base redevelopment. Each of the five strategies has a defined Study Area, which are shown in Figure 1-1. 1.3 Purpose and Need The intent of the purpose and need outlined in this section is to describe and support the Feasibility Study. The purpose and need of a project establish a basis for the development of a range of reasonable options and assist with the identification, analysis, and eventual selection of a Preferred Option(s). The Purpose and Need Statement is used for comparing the effectiveness and impacts of the various Study options to the No Action Option. Introduction 13
The Purpose and Need Statement is fundamental to the analysis of a Feasibility Study under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Clean Water Act (Section 404), and other environmental regulations. Project Purpose and Need The purpose of this Feasibility Study is to guide future infrastructure investments to enhance mobility and access for redevelopment of the NASB, including the Topsham Annex, by: identifying measures to improve safety at problem locations in the Study Area accommodating future traffic demands related to commuter trips and the shipment of goods and services to and from the redeveloped NASB considering multimodal options (e.g., public transit and vehicular, rail, bicycle, and pedestrian modes) that improve access efficiency at the redeveloped NASB from I-295, US Route 1, and State Route 196 evaluating the engineering and environmental feasibility of creating a rail connection to the NASB As described in the previous section, five needs were identified for evaluation. In meeting these needs, the proposed transportation solutions must dovetail with the goals of the communities of Topsham and Brunswick, which include minimizing NASB-related trips through downtown Brunswick and residential districts and maintaining and enhancing livable communities. Options to be considered include the No Action Option; TDM strategies to reduce vehicle trips (e.g., ride sharing/carpooling and public transit); enhanced rail service; and adding capacity to existing roadways by widening and improving intersections and interchanges. 1.4 Public Participation Process An open and consensus-driven public participation process that engages all stakeholders is key to the development and refinement of thoughtful transportation solutions. Good planning practice involves a mutual learning process among practitioners, elected officials, residents, business groups, citizen groups, and other affected parties. The thoughts, concerns, and ideas of the general public on Study Area transportation needs, problems, and solutions are critical to crafting and refining solutions that are practical, permittable, affordable, and context-sensitive in meeting the transportation needs. Various methods were provided to simplify the process as much as possible for the public to learn about and provide input on the Feasibility Study. Introduction 14
Page 1 and 2: Transportation Feasibility Study Re
Page 4 and 5: Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 6 and 7: 4.11.1 Maine Street/US Route 1 Inte
Page 8 and 9: List of Figures Figure No. Descript
Page 10 and 11: Executive Summary Introduction/Back
Page 12 and 13: motorists to get out of their vehic
Page 14 and 15: along each of the cross roadways. U
Page 16 and 17: leg of the intersection, which prov
Page 18 and 19: Route 1 intersection could be consi
Page 20 and 21: 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Backgrou
Page 24 and 25: 1.4.1 Public Informational Meetings
Page 26 and 27: Table 1.4-3. Study Advisory Committ
Page 28 and 29: F CATHANCE RIVER MEADOW RD W HITEHO
Page 30 and 31: as a principal arterial and extends
Page 32 and 33: membership fee of $35. ZipCar membe
Page 34 and 35: network, with the goal of providing
Page 36 and 37: Androscoggin River Bicycle and Pede
Page 38 and 39: 2009 Design Hour Volume The unit of
Page 40 and 41: Table 2.2-1. Existing Traffic-Volum
Page 42 and 43: USE CROOSING RD JESSE RD D AUGUST C
Page 44: Table 2.2-3. Unsignalized Intersect
Page 47 and 48: were identified, individual police
Page 49 and 50: determined to be HCLs. A sixth inte
Page 51 and 52: HOUSE CROOSING RD JESSE RD RD AUGUS
Page 53 and 54: grocery store. The size of the pond
Page 55 and 56: The Strategy 2B Study Area east of
Page 57 and 58: Sections 435-449). However, the riv
Page 59 and 60: Areas mapped by the NRCS as Prime F
Page 61 and 62: OUSE CROOSING RD JESSE RD RD AUGUST
Page 67 and 68: the MRRA. This report presents info
Page 69 and 70: anged between 14 sales in 2008 and
Page 71 and 72: to have covered the entire town. No
Page 73 and 74:
Table 2.4-1. Properties Listed in t
Page 75 and 76:
Town/Address /Location Name Brief D
Page 77 and 78:
unclear whether any other additiona
Page 79 and 80:
Strategy 2B Based on field observat
Page 81 and 82:
P USE CROOSING RD JESSE RD D AUGUST
Page 83 and 84:
3 Future Conditions 3.1 Introductio
Page 85 and 86:
3.3 NASB and Topsham Annex Trip Est
Page 89 and 90:
(also known as internal capture). A
Page 91 and 92:
4 Summary of Options 4.1 Introducti
Page 93 and 94:
Site Walk Access Improvements: This
Page 95 and 96:
4.5 Passenger Rail and Bus Rapid Tr
Page 97 and 98:
and then overpasses US Route 1 adja
Page 99 and 100:
parallel to US Route 1. They termin
Page 101 and 102:
MAP-41 LOT-14E MAP-41 LOT-14D MAP-4
Page 103 and 104:
MAP-41 LOT-17B MAP-44 LOT-1 MAP-44
Page 105 and 106:
o o Options 3A and 3B assess the po
Page 107 and 108:
short distance (i.e., 0.1 mile) bef
Page 109 and 110:
4.7.5 Option 3A Option 3A (Figure 4
Page 111 and 112:
Option 5 widens and reconstructs a
Page 113 and 114:
HORTON PL REST DR UV196 ANTHONYAV 2
Page 115 and 116:
AV Map R05A Lot 30- Map R05A Lot 31
Page 117 and 118:
Map R04 Lot 18- Map R04 Lot 47-2 LL
Page 119 and 120:
4.8 Strategy 2B - Improve Mobility
Page 121 and 122:
four options, and the maximum benef
Page 123 and 124:
oundabout from the south. This opti
Page 125 and 126:
MAP-U25 LOT-20 Bailey Ln Ln B ailey
Page 127 and 128:
MAP-U24 LOT-2A River Rd MAP-U24 LOT
Page 129 and 130:
MAP-U25 LOT-20 MAP-16 LOT-1 Bailey
Page 131 and 132:
MAP-U25 LOT-20 MAP-16 LOT-1 Bailey
Page 133 and 134:
Option 1 includes continuous sidewa
Page 135 and 136:
MAP-U23 LOT-94 MAP-U23 LOT-90 Map U
Page 137 and 138:
The primary challenge with Option 1
Page 139 and 140:
Town of Brunswick, Maine MAP-U04 LO
Page 141 and 142:
Town of Brunswick, Maine 1 £¤ And
Page 143 and 144:
Results of the preliminary screenin
Page 145 and 146:
Summary of Options 136
Page 147 and 148:
5.1.2 Traffic Operations As previou
Page 149 and 150:
5.1.4 Cost Estimates Planning-level
Page 151 and 152:
impacted property. However, using t
Page 153:
Bath Road. The following signalized
Page 156 and 157:
5.2.3 Build Options A traffic-opera
Page 158 and 159:
(USACE) if it is selected for advan
Page 160 and 161:
oadways located on the northeast an
Page 162 and 163:
intersection of US Route 201 and Ol
Page 164 and 165:
etaining a signalized intersection
Page 166 and 167:
5.2.3.4 Strategy 2C - Improve Mobil
Page 168 and 169:
Environmental Impacts Environmental
Page 170 and 171:
6 Conclusions The purpose of this F
Page 172 and 173:
Because the secondary connector roa
Page 183 and 184:
Appendix B Throughout the study, th
Page 185 and 186:
From: missysdad@hotmail.com [mailto
Page 187 and 188:
everyday traffic for doctor visits
Page 189 and 190:
carpool, mass transit, or other. Wh
Page 191 and 192:
decision makers are going to faced
Page 193 and 194:
From: cwiercinski@sitelinespa.com S
Page 195 and 196:
From: mar-e_trebilcock@msad51.org [
Page 197 and 198:
From: Chris Baker, Harpswell [chris
Page 199 and 200:
I thought that the Topsham Coastal
Page 201 and 202:
From: charris@tidewater.net Sent: F
Page 203 and 204:
Brunswick, ME 04011 207-729-0787 Al
Page 205 and 206:
proposals it requires the most land
Page 207 and 208:
From: cp348@aol.com [mailto:cp348@a
Page 209 and 210:
Do NOT add to mailing list. Email s
Page 211 and 212:
'inner' Pleasant Street is a barrie
Page 213:
We are requesting that as part of t
show all

Final Report - VHB.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?