03.01.2015 Views

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2.3 Build Options<br />

A traffic-operations analysis, similar to the analysis of existing conditions, was<br />

conducted for the future 2035 DHVs. The analyses were conducted for each Build<br />

option considered for each Strategy.<br />

5.2.3.1 Strategy 1 – Direct Access to US Route 1<br />

Transportation Operations<br />

As described in Chapter 4, Strategy 1 considers three interchange options to improve<br />

direct access to and from US Route 1 and the NASB: Option 1 is the trumpet/loop<br />

interchange; Option 2 is the flyover interchange; and Option 3 is the split-diamond<br />

interchange.<br />

The results of the operational analyses show that each ramp movement at US Route 1<br />

(i.e., merge, diverge, and weave movements) for Options 1 and 2 operate at LOS D or<br />

better. The southbound on-ramp merge movement for both options shows an LOS D<br />

operation with all other ramp movements operating at LOS C or better.<br />

All ramp movements for Option 3 operate at LOS C or better. Additionally, the four<br />

signalized intersections located on the two connector roadways for Option 3 operate<br />

at LOS B<br />

or better. The aggressive TDM program results in modest improvement for all<br />

movements with all three options. However, for most intersections and ramp<br />

movements, the LOS is unchanged.<br />

It is important that the US Route 1 southbound off-ramp to the Coastal Connector<br />

interchange is projected to operate at LOS F by 2035. With implementation of an<br />

aggressive TDM program, the operation improves to LOS E. Nevertheless,<br />

consideration should be given – perhaps in a future planning study – to<br />

reconfiguring the interchange so that the Coastal Connector and the segment of US<br />

Route 1 north of the Connector are aligned as the highway mainline and the segment<br />

of US Route 1 southwest of the Connector being subordinate. Incidentally, this type<br />

of reconfiguration is consistent with the idea of encouraging regional through traffic<br />

to use the Coastal Connector in Topsham rather than Pleasant Street in Brunswick.<br />

The idea of directing regional through traffic to the Coastal Connector was suggested<br />

by many people throughout the public input process.<br />

All three options result in reduced traffic volume demands along Bath Road and<br />

Gurnet Road, which improves traffic operations. The intersection at Bath Road and<br />

Merrymeeting Plaza is projected to improve from LOS E under the No Action<br />

condition to LOS C for each of the three options - with and without the<br />

implementation of TDM. Similarly, the intersection at Bath Road and US Route<br />

Conclusions 147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!