03.01.2015 Views

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In terms of standing structures, the area does not contain any buildings or structures<br />

that are more than 45 years old, except for what appears to be a fragment of a wood<br />

bridge railing within the site of the former Merrymeeting Park north of US Route 1.<br />

The area is characterized by more recently constructed <strong>com</strong>mercial developments<br />

and trailer parks. \<br />

5.2.3.2 Strategy 2A - Improved Mobility along State<br />

Route 196 and US Route 201<br />

Transportation Operations<br />

Strategy Area 2A involves roadway improvements to three distinct areas and<br />

evaluates five improvement scenarios, as follows:<br />

I-295 southbound on-ramp (Option 1)<br />

State Route 196/US Route 201 intersection and widening improvements (Options<br />

2, 2A, 3, and 3A)<br />

US Route 201 intersection and roadway improvements at the Topsham Annex<br />

(Options 4 and 5)<br />

Option 1 consists of installing a traffic signal on State Route 196 at the I-295<br />

southbound ramp. The option also involves extending the length of the existing State<br />

Route 196 westbound left-turn lane. The purpose of this option is to safely and<br />

efficiently ac<strong>com</strong>modate motorists turning left onto the I-295 southbound ramp. With<br />

this option in place, operations are projected to improve from LOS E under the No<br />

Action unsignalized condition to LOS A. The option substantially meets each<br />

Feasibility Study objectives except encouraging multimodal mobility.<br />

Option 2 consists of the construction of a two-lane roundabout at the State Route<br />

196/US Route 201 intersection. The concept of the roundabout was developed and<br />

evaluated at this intersection because it was believed – as a suggested at the public<br />

workshop – that it would efficiently process the heavy east-west Coastal Connector<br />

traffic flow while simultaneously introducing a traffic-calming effect that would<br />

reduce travel speeds and, as a result, enhance the safe and efficient movement of<br />

pedestrians and bicyclists. However, results of the operational analyses show the<br />

westbound approach (i.e., motorists entering the roundabout from the Coastal<br />

Connector) operating at LOS F. Additionally, the aggressive TDM program would<br />

reduce the volume of traffic at the roundabout, but the westbound approach would<br />

still operate at LOS F.<br />

Options 3 and 3A consist of grade-separating the Coastal Connector/US Route 201<br />

intersection by having the Coastal Connector bridge over US Route 201. Access to US<br />

Route 201 from the Coastal Connector would be provided by way of connector<br />

Conclusions 150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!