03.01.2015 Views

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Impacts<br />

Environmental Resources<br />

Both alignments avoid impacts to wetlands, streams, and rivers, and no hazardousmaterial<br />

sites were found in the footprint of the proposed rail alignments. Neither<br />

alignment requires a substantial amount of new pavement, which would limit the<br />

potential for future stormwater impacts. However, the open fields at the northern<br />

end of the NASB runways contain habitat for two protected bird species that depend<br />

on open grasslands: the state-threatened upland sandpiper and state-endangered<br />

grasshopper sparrow. Understanding the potential impacts to these species is an<br />

important issue if Strategy 3 is selected for advancement. Because the western<br />

options affect more of this grassland habitat, it is expected that Options 1 and 1A<br />

would have a greater effect on these species. Additionally, the western options<br />

would have more potential impact to the sand and gravel aquifer found in this area.<br />

Right-of-Way<br />

The western options (Options 1 and 1A) require slightly more ROW acquisition than<br />

the eastern options (Options 2 and 2A), estimated at approximately 7 acres or about 6<br />

acres, respectively. Most of this ROW impact would occur to land currently within<br />

the NASB, with some minor strip takings along Bath Road (i.e., State Route 24). For<br />

this reason, the tax-loss implications of this strategy are quite limited because NASB<br />

property has not previously been on the tax rolls. No park or recreation areas would<br />

be affected.<br />

Cultural Resources<br />

No standing structures would be directly affected by either rail-connection option;<br />

therefore, the potential for impacts to historic buildings is very low. However, as<br />

discussed for Strategy 1, previous archeological studies established a number of<br />

historic and prehistoric archeological sites in this area. Additional field surveys of the<br />

area of potential impact would need to be conducted to adequately understand<br />

potential effects to archeological resources that may result from the construction of<br />

the rail connection.<br />

Airspace Obstruction Analysis<br />

Strategy 3 Options 1, 1A, 2, and 2A, which provide direct freight rail-spur access to<br />

the NASB, were examined to determine if they had any impact to the NASB airspace<br />

for Runways 19R and 19L. Options 1 (grade-separated) and 1A (at-grade) are located<br />

approximately 700 feet east of Runway 19 and fall within the controlling airspace<br />

obstruction departure surface. Options 2 (grade-separated) and 2a (at-grade) are<br />

located approximately 0.5 mile farther east of Runway 19L and out of the direct<br />

influence of the NASB runway obstruction departure surface and not subjected to<br />

any further evaluation. Options 1 and 1A were evaluated to identify potential<br />

conflicts in the form of obstructions, hazards to air navigation, and air-service<br />

limitations that may arise from bringing rail service into the airport. Option 1, as<br />

Conclusions 159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!