03.01.2015 Views

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

Final Report - VHB.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to have covered the entire town. No project-specific inventory was conducted for the<br />

State Route 196 connector. 9<br />

Buildings and structures in the NASB and its satellite facilities in Brunswick and<br />

Topsham were surveyed in 1995–1996 by Louis Berger Associates. 10 A Phase IA<br />

archeological-resource study also was conducted, which is discussed in Subsection<br />

2.4.2.2. The report concluded that only three pre-1946 resources (i.e., three earthcovered<br />

steel magazines from 1943) met the NRHC Criterion C for eligibility. The<br />

remaining pre-1946 resources were not re<strong>com</strong>mended as eligible due to a<br />

demonstrable lack of significance and integrity. A series of buildings and structures<br />

that were not yet 50 years old was re<strong>com</strong>mended as potentially eligible once they<br />

reached the age of 50 years. The facility was subjected to additional historic<br />

architectural and archaeological investigations in the past year. The historic<br />

architectural investigation, which was <strong>com</strong>pleted in May 2010, concluded that only a<br />

series of ammunition magazines were additionally determined eligible for the<br />

National Register of Historic Places. 11 The Phase I archaeological investigations were<br />

<strong>com</strong>pleted in 2009 and 2010; MHPC does not have a final report on that work yet, but<br />

another 15 sites or so were found. The total for both 2009 and 2010 Phase I<br />

investigations was 35 sites, about evenly split between prehistoric and historic. The<br />

earliest prehistoric site is Paleoindian. Most of the historic sites are mid-19 th century.<br />

Of those 35 sites, 27 are potentially NR eligible, and will need Phase II archaeological<br />

work, an NR determination, and maybe other work in advance of construction. All of<br />

the site protection and future work will be incorporated into a Programmatic<br />

Agreement, and a “covenant” that will bind future owners and run with the<br />

property. 12<br />

Mapping of previously inventoried and listed properties was <strong>com</strong>pleted in GIS and<br />

is shown in Figure 2-13. The boundaries of existing NRHP historic districts and<br />

individual properties shown in the figure were based on maps provided in the<br />

respective NRHP nominations. The dates of NRHP listings came from the National<br />

Register Information System of the National Park Service. The location of<br />

individually inventoried properties shown in the same figure was based on U.S.<br />

Geological Survey quadrangles included with the inventory form or through<br />

identification of an approximate location using the address provided on the form.<br />

Table 2.4-1 identifies properties in both Brunswick and Topsham that are listed in the<br />

NRHP. Table 2.4-2 identifies properties that were previously inventoried but not<br />

necessarily evaluated for their NRHP eligibility.<br />

<br />

9<br />

Christi Mitchell, MHPC, personal <strong>com</strong>munication, December 7, 2009.<br />

10 The satellite facilities are the East Brunswick Remote Transmitter Site and the McKeen Housing Complex, Brunswick;<br />

the Topsham Annex, Topsham; and the Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape School in Redington.<br />

11 Kirk Mohney, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, MHPC/<strong>com</strong>munication to Rita Walsh, <strong>VHB</strong>, 9-23-2010.<br />

12 Dr. Arthur Spiess, Senior Archaeologist, MHPC/<strong>com</strong>munication to Rita Walsh, <strong>VHB</strong>, 9-23-2010.<br />

Existing Conditions 62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!