Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis
Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis
Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
analytic populations. 182<br />
Stanley Feder recounts how a tipping point<br />
began to apply to a political analysis method at the CIA in the 1970s<br />
<strong>and</strong> 1980s. The method involved two estimative tools known as<br />
Factions <strong>and</strong> Policon that were used by the “<strong>Intelligence</strong> Directorate<br />
<strong>and</strong> the National <strong>Intelligence</strong> Council’s <strong>Analysis</strong> Group to analyze<br />
scores of policy <strong>and</strong> instability issues in over 30 countries.” 183<br />
The<br />
reasons for the adoption of these tools remain the same: “Forecasts<br />
<strong>and</strong> analyses…have proved to be significantly more precise <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed than traditional analyses.” 184<br />
Writing about the method in<br />
1987, Feder predicted that its use would continue to exp<strong>and</strong>. 185 The<br />
method is still in use 19 years after Feder’s article was published.<br />
However, exp<strong>and</strong>ed use failed – perhaps because the tool was on a<br />
computer platform that ceased to be supported by the Agency. The<br />
recent transfer of the tool to a new suite of programs corresponds<br />
with observations that its use is once again exp<strong>and</strong>ing. 186<br />
Non-intelligence-related transformational stories can be applied<br />
in the <strong>Intelligence</strong> Community to facilitate the spread of new ways<br />
182 Malcolm Gladwell, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big<br />
Difference (Boston, MA: Little Brown <strong>and</strong> Company, 2000), 15–29. Gladwell shows<br />
how “social epidemics” can infect a variety of domains.<br />
183 Stanley Feder, “Factions <strong>and</strong> Policon: New Ways to Analyze Politics,”<br />
in H. Bradford Westerfield, ed., Inside CIA’s Private World: Declassified Articles from the<br />
Agency’s Internal Journal, 1955–1992 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995),<br />
275. Cited hereafter as Feder, “Factions <strong>and</strong> Policon.”<br />
184 Feder, “Factions <strong>and</strong> Policon,” 292.<br />
185 Feder, “Factions <strong>and</strong> Policon,” 292. Feder was wrong about its sustained<br />
popular growth.<br />
186 This story is not an isolated instance. In the author’s experience, initial<br />
implementation <strong>and</strong> popularization are often followed by a gradually reduced<br />
user-base. Certain organizations find the tools useful <strong>and</strong> they tend to continue<br />
to use them even though any underlying technology may be obsolete. In the<br />
case of Factions <strong>and</strong> Policon, the tools were maintained on an aged Macintosh<br />
computer. They were updated in 2006 as part of the work of an intelligence<br />
research firm in New Mexico. The Factions tool was rewritten <strong>and</strong> included in<br />
L<strong>and</strong>scape Decision®, a suite of modeling <strong>and</strong> simulation tools developed under<br />
a research contract with the Department of Defense’s Advanced Research <strong>and</strong><br />
Development Activity (ARDA). The updated technology was reinserted into the<br />
tasking organization. Other technology transfers are pending.<br />
– 76 –