- Page 2 and 3:
The National Defense Intelligence C
- Page 5 and 6:
Contents Figures and Tables........
- Page 7:
Figures and Tables Figure 1: A Comp
- Page 10 and 11:
- viii -
- Page 12 and 13:
As one would expect, the Intelligen
- Page 14 and 15:
- xii -
- Page 16 and 17:
quality by looking at the products
- Page 18 and 19:
Commentary Francis J. Hughes Profes
- Page 20 and 21:
That said, clever defense lawyers o
- Page 22 and 23:
Robert Heibel, Mercyhurst College;
- Page 25 and 26:
CRITICAL THINKING AND INTELLIGENCE
- Page 27 and 28:
CRITICAL THINKING AND INTELLIGENCE
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 1 models analysts’ thinkin
- Page 31 and 32:
ecome better critical thinkers will
- Page 33 and 34:
- and consequences - things that do
- Page 35 and 36:
approach ensures that a topic or is
- Page 37 and 38:
Skill-Based Definitions Other appro
- Page 39 and 40:
A Disposition to Think Critically I
- Page 41 and 42:
The Role of Questions Greg Treverto
- Page 43 and 44:
problem solving and structured meth
- Page 45 and 46:
In fact, the Soviets were able to d
- Page 47 and 48:
It should be noted that the U.S. In
- Page 49 and 50:
thwarted What can be learned to adv
- Page 51 and 52:
Purpose · Determine what is going
- Page 53 and 54:
critical thinking could moderate th
- Page 55 and 56:
Cuba” that led to the tasking of
- Page 57 and 58:
A missile-launching complex is not
- Page 59 and 60:
(mapping), evaluate and adapt the i
- Page 61 and 62:
Winners and Losers: The Crisis in C
- Page 63 and 64:
as seen from Khrushchev’s Point o
- Page 65 and 66:
the Soviet Union’s communist agen
- Page 67 and 68:
supporting forces, an escalation of
- Page 69 and 70:
in the hands of the West. If, as Al
- Page 71 and 72:
most recent failure. Critical think
- Page 73 and 74:
was not enough. 117 Biases and mind
- Page 75 and 76:
asked, as they realized they had no
- Page 77 and 78:
person, the analysis was faulty bec
- Page 79 and 80:
undermines or supports the particul
- Page 81 and 82:
to meet short deadlines. However, a
- Page 83 and 84:
the FBI investigated a pond in west
- Page 85 and 86:
How can Analysts be Taught to Think
- Page 87 and 88:
young analysts were unable to do so
- Page 89 and 90: it out on their own, encouraged by
- Page 91 and 92: instructional models offer compleme
- Page 93 and 94: Another means of critical thinking
- Page 95 and 96: time constraints, multiple versions
- Page 97 and 98: they were required to examine. 173
- Page 99 and 100: As Denning points out, these strate
- Page 101 and 102: of thinking. For example, two video
- Page 103 and 104: intelligence agencies. 191 This was
- Page 105 and 106: thinking, however, by providing str
- Page 107 and 108: Cooper’s Analytic Pathology Negle
- Page 109 and 110: substantially better judgments abou
- Page 111 and 112: item limit is easily extended: peop
- Page 113 and 114: Finally, it may be a fallacy that c
- Page 115 and 116: partnerships between analysts and t
- Page 117 and 118: 1990s and 2000s Emergence of comple
- Page 119 and 120: Conclusion Never before in our peac
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix NSA’s Critical Thinking
- Page 123 and 124: Administration: Enrollment: Up to 2
- Page 125 and 126: against which to apply/illustrate w
- Page 127 and 128: mindsets impact analysis. • Defin
- Page 129 and 130: • Describe what is needed to move
- Page 131 and 132: Class 4 - Causes, Squares, and Shru
- Page 133 and 134: Class 6 - Testing the Devil’s and
- Page 135 and 136: Class 8 - And Now for Something Com
- Page 137 and 138: Class 10 - Final Project Presentati
- Page 139: Final Project Evaluation Worksheet
- Page 143 and 144: Cheikes, Brant A., Mark J. Brown, P
- Page 145 and 146: __________. Building Airplanes in F
- Page 147 and 148: Grabo, Cynthia M. Anticipating Surp
- Page 149 and 150: Kerbel, Josh. “Thinking Straight:
- Page 151 and 152: Miller, Judith. “A Battle of Word
- Page 153 and 154: Paul, Richard W., Linda Elder, and
- Page 155 and 156: Stefik, Mark, and Barbara Stefik. B
- Page 157 and 158: About the Author David T. Moore is