Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Robert Heibel, Mercyhurst College; Richards J. Heuer, Jr., Central Intelligence Agency (retired); Norval J. Hilmer, Defense Intelligence Agency; LTCOL James Holden-Rhodes, USMC (retired); Morgan D. Jones, Central Intelligence Agency (retired); Hugo Keesing, Defense Intelligence Agency (retired); Mark Marshall, NDIC; Stephen Marrin, University of Virginia; Montgomery McFate, Institute for Defense Analysis; William Reynolds, Least Squares Software; the staff of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Sherman Kent Center; and the staff of the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. Several other colleagues at the National Security Agency – who wish to remain anonymous – also offered valuable insight and suggestions. Three colleagues, Mark Lowenthal, president of the Intelligence & Security Academy, LLC; Jeffrey Cooper, Science Applications International Corporation; and Gregory Treverton, Rand Corporation, also deserve mention. Mark kindly agreed to write the foreword and offered valuable suggestions. His quip about really good analysts set up much of the arguments presented herein. Both Jeff and Greg provided critical comments and suggestions late in the game. They also kindly agreed to write commentaries on the paper. Russell Swenson, Director of NDIC’s Center for Strategic Intelligence Research and NDIC Press editor, did what a really good editor is supposed to do: His input and recommendations ensured that the arguments that follow were focused and strong. The Center’s William Spracher also provided valuable technical editing services. Colleague Lisa Krizan provided a final review of the text that proved extremely valuable. This paper would not have been published if not for their dedicated assistance to the author. Acknowledgment is due to four other people. Peter and Mary Moore encouraged their son to be inquisitive and to always look beyond the obvious for answers. Anthropologist John McDaniel first introduced the author – then a student at Washington and Lee University – to an analogy for intelligence sensemaking: science-based field archaeology. Finally, Elizabeth Moore provided tremendous encouragement. She also graciously tolerated the many nights and weekends spent writing, listening to, and commenting on, ideas as – xx –
they occurred, sharpening the resulting arguments. It is to these people that this work is dedicated. While the author was privileged to receive assistance of others, this remains his work and any errors are his. The author may be reached via electronic mail at dtmoore@nsa.gov. – xxi –
Page 2 and 3: The National Defense Intelligence C
Page 5 and 6: Contents Figures and Tables........
Page 7: Figures and Tables Figure 1: A Comp
Page 10 and 11: - viii -
Page 12 and 13: As one would expect, the Intelligen
Page 14 and 15: - xii -
Page 16 and 17: quality by looking at the products
Page 18 and 19: Commentary Francis J. Hughes Profes
Page 20 and 21: That said, clever defense lawyers o
Page 25 and 26: CRITICAL THINKING AND INTELLIGENCE
Page 27 and 28: CRITICAL THINKING AND INTELLIGENCE
Page 29 and 30: Figure 1 models analysts’ thinkin
Page 31 and 32: ecome better critical thinkers will
Page 33 and 34: - and consequences - things that do
Page 35 and 36: approach ensures that a topic or is
Page 37 and 38: Skill-Based Definitions Other appro
Page 39 and 40: A Disposition to Think Critically I
Page 41 and 42: The Role of Questions Greg Treverto
Page 43 and 44: problem solving and structured meth
Page 45 and 46: In fact, the Soviets were able to d
Page 47 and 48: It should be noted that the U.S. In
Page 49 and 50: thwarted What can be learned to adv
Page 51 and 52: Purpose · Determine what is going
Page 53 and 54: critical thinking could moderate th
Page 55 and 56: Cuba” that led to the tasking of
Page 57 and 58: A missile-launching complex is not
Page 59 and 60: (mapping), evaluate and adapt the i
Page 61 and 62: Winners and Losers: The Crisis in C
Page 63 and 64: as seen from Khrushchev’s Point o
Page 65 and 66: the Soviet Union’s communist agen
Page 67 and 68: supporting forces, an escalation of
Page 69 and 70: in the hands of the West. If, as Al
Page 71 and 72: most recent failure. Critical think
Page 73 and 74:
was not enough. 117 Biases and mind
Page 75 and 76:
asked, as they realized they had no
Page 77 and 78:
person, the analysis was faulty bec
Page 79 and 80:
undermines or supports the particul
Page 81 and 82:
to meet short deadlines. However, a
Page 83 and 84:
the FBI investigated a pond in west
Page 85 and 86:
How can Analysts be Taught to Think
Page 87 and 88:
young analysts were unable to do so
Page 89 and 90:
it out on their own, encouraged by
Page 91 and 92:
instructional models offer compleme
Page 93 and 94:
Another means of critical thinking
Page 95 and 96:
time constraints, multiple versions
Page 97 and 98:
they were required to examine. 173
Page 99 and 100:
As Denning points out, these strate
Page 101 and 102:
of thinking. For example, two video
Page 103 and 104:
intelligence agencies. 191 This was
Page 105 and 106:
thinking, however, by providing str
Page 107 and 108:
Cooper’s Analytic Pathology Negle
Page 109 and 110:
substantially better judgments abou
Page 111 and 112:
item limit is easily extended: peop
Page 113 and 114:
Finally, it may be a fallacy that c
Page 115 and 116:
partnerships between analysts and t
Page 117 and 118:
1990s and 2000s Emergence of comple
Page 119 and 120:
Conclusion Never before in our peac
Page 121 and 122:
Appendix NSA’s Critical Thinking
Page 123 and 124:
Administration: Enrollment: Up to 2
Page 125 and 126:
against which to apply/illustrate w
Page 127 and 128:
mindsets impact analysis. • Defin
Page 129 and 130:
• Describe what is needed to move
Page 131 and 132:
Class 4 - Causes, Squares, and Shru
Page 133 and 134:
Class 6 - Testing the Devil’s and
Page 135 and 136:
Class 8 - And Now for Something Com
Page 137 and 138:
Class 10 - Final Project Presentati
Page 139 and 140:
Final Project Evaluation Worksheet
Page 141 and 142:
Bibliography Ackerman, Robert K.
Page 143 and 144:
Cheikes, Brant A., Mark J. Brown, P
Page 145 and 146:
__________. Building Airplanes in F
Page 147 and 148:
Grabo, Cynthia M. Anticipating Surp
Page 149 and 150:
Kerbel, Josh. “Thinking Straight:
Page 151 and 152:
Miller, Judith. “A Battle of Word
Page 153 and 154:
Paul, Richard W., Linda Elder, and
Page 155 and 156:
Stefik, Mark, and Barbara Stefik. B
Page 157 and 158:
About the Author David T. Moore is
show all

Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?