09.02.2015 Views

Feasibility Study of Proposed Tourism Dev in Shewula, NE ...

Feasibility Study of Proposed Tourism Dev in Shewula, NE ...

Feasibility Study of Proposed Tourism Dev in Shewula, NE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual community members on a range <strong>of</strong> issues that were<br />

significant for the research.<br />

b) Misunderstand<strong>in</strong>gs and misconceptions<br />

In several <strong>in</strong>stances the community expressed op<strong>in</strong>ions based on <strong>in</strong>correct<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation and/or perceptions. These are reflected <strong>in</strong> assumptions that were made<br />

about the '<strong>Shewula</strong> Game Reserve' and about the study team.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> the term '<strong>Shewula</strong> Game Reserve' generated certa<strong>in</strong> expectations<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g the presence <strong>of</strong> wildlife and types <strong>of</strong> tourist activities that were and/or are<br />

not really expected, planned or appropriate.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the community members held erroneous perceptions about the study team.<br />

This was especially the case regard<strong>in</strong>g the role and function <strong>of</strong> UCT researchers.<br />

Some community members misunderstood the aims and <strong>in</strong>tentions <strong>of</strong> the study,<br />

although these were expla<strong>in</strong>ed at the first formal group meet<strong>in</strong>g, held <strong>in</strong> <strong>Shewula</strong> on<br />

12 February 1999.<br />

1.6.2. Strengths: Or Mitigation aga<strong>in</strong>st limitations<br />

Potential pitfalls that were to be avoided dur<strong>in</strong>g the research process were identified<br />

prior to and dur<strong>in</strong>g the fieldwork period. These <strong>in</strong>cluded the impact <strong>of</strong> the research<br />

process itself, unreliable translation, and the possibility that <strong>in</strong>dividuals and/or groups<br />

with hidden agendas could manipulate the research process. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the research<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> actions were therefore taken <strong>in</strong> order to m<strong>in</strong>imise the possibility that these<br />

occurred.<br />

1.6.2.1. Limit<strong>in</strong>g the impact <strong>of</strong> the research process<br />

In order to guard aga<strong>in</strong>st the possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the study on the social organisation<br />

and authority structures <strong>in</strong> the community, the follow<strong>in</strong>g steps were taken:<br />

• It was emphasised to the general community that the study team respected the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g social and political organisational practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>Shewula</strong>. The study team<br />

also followed the standard procedures for community meet<strong>in</strong>gs and aimed at all<br />

times to obta<strong>in</strong> the necessary approval from the relevant authorities before<br />

undertak<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong> the community. The study team also observed the socially<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed differentiation's <strong>in</strong> gender-specific behaviour, when <strong>in</strong>vited <strong>in</strong>to the homes<br />

<strong>of</strong> community residents, or when attend<strong>in</strong>g their public meet<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

• Issues that arose dur<strong>in</strong>g discussions with the community that were unrelated to<br />

the topic under discussion but <strong>in</strong>fluenced responses to these topics were noted<br />

and then set aside with the assurance that they would be passed on to the<br />

relevant parties for them to address.<br />

• The study team worked closely with representatives from the traditional leadership<br />

as well as members from the general community.<br />

1.6.2.2. Improv<strong>in</strong>g the reliability <strong>of</strong> translation<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> translators was essential dur<strong>in</strong>g the fieldwork <strong>in</strong> the community, and there<br />

were problems associated with translation, such as the possibility <strong>of</strong> mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

and a lack <strong>of</strong> trust <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g responses. However, the follow<strong>in</strong>g characteristics <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!