10.02.2015 Views

Cesar2000-Economics of Coral Reefs.pdf

Cesar2000-Economics of Coral Reefs.pdf

Cesar2000-Economics of Coral Reefs.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the type <strong>of</strong> use, are not linked to varying levels <strong>of</strong> producer<br />

surplus. None <strong>of</strong> these funds are explicitly directed<br />

to pay for the management <strong>of</strong> the Montego Bay Marine<br />

Park. No other government or management agency fees<br />

or charges are specifically linked to either tourism or<br />

fisheries related activities in the area. Corporate pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

taxes, or personal income tax in the case <strong>of</strong> the fishers or<br />

<strong>of</strong> individually distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its from tourism-related<br />

businesses, may also capture a portion <strong>of</strong> the rent. However,<br />

taxes are paid to the general government collectorate<br />

and thus are not explicitly available for use in marine<br />

park management. The current interests <strong>of</strong> the Montego<br />

Bay Marine Park to implement user fees should be encouraged.<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Establish sui generis (novel) rights to tangible property<br />

and traditional knowledge in order to define who has<br />

the right to participate in and benefit from the negotiation<br />

<strong>of</strong> contracts involving a transfer <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />

resources or traditional knowledge;<br />

Develop prior informed consent procedures in order<br />

to give the legal owners <strong>of</strong> rights to genetic resources<br />

and traditional knowledge a means to control use <strong>of</strong><br />

these resources; and,<br />

Create a national benefit sharing formula to convert a<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> monetary income derived from new product<br />

development into public goods to ensure a fair<br />

and equitable sharing <strong>of</strong> benefits from genetic resources<br />

utilisation.<br />

2.7.2 CASE STUDY — INSTITUTIONS AND<br />

POLICY ADVICE FOR BIOPROSPECTING IN JAMAICA<br />

Putterman (1998) <strong>of</strong>fers specific policy and institutional<br />

strengthening advice with respect to the incorporation<br />

<strong>of</strong> genetic resource utilisation into ICZM in Jamaica as a<br />

potentially powerful tool for conservation and economic<br />

development. Genetic or molecular diversity, a measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the biological diversity within species, can be the<br />

source <strong>of</strong> new pharmaceuticals, industrial products and<br />

agricultural varieties. Many strategies for research collaboration,<br />

as a risk-reducing strategy to maximise the ability<br />

to discover promising new chemicals or genes, may be<br />

employed; as well, many benefit sharing mechanisms and<br />

options for compensation exist (see Putterman 1998). As<br />

noted by Putterman (1998), there are currently no Jamaican<br />

policies to regulate access to genetic resources. A<br />

review <strong>of</strong> Jamaican institutions and policies lead to the<br />

following key recommendations (Putterman 1998):<br />

● In the design <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> resources policy options,<br />

incorporate obligations under the Convention on Biological<br />

Diversity and the United Nations Convention<br />

on the Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea, as well as take account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effect that policy-making will have on private sector<br />

activities;<br />

● Regulate access to genetic resources up-front with<br />

permits and contracts to define rights to these resources<br />

before samples are collected or exported;<br />

Potential bioprospecting net present values are small in<br />

comparison to current local use values associated with<br />

tourism and coastal protection (Gustavson 1998;<br />

Ruitenbeek & Cartier 1999) and, as noted above, are<br />

expected to have a negligible effect on marginal coral<br />

reef values. However, Ruitenbeek & Cartier (1999) note<br />

that the impacts <strong>of</strong> the institutional costs associated with<br />

the operation <strong>of</strong> a national bioprospecting program in<br />

Jamaica, as recommended by Putterman (1998), are<br />

minimal. The implementation <strong>of</strong> a bioprospecting program<br />

may be warranted. The question becomes one <strong>of</strong><br />

the willingness <strong>of</strong> local management and stakeholders <strong>of</strong><br />

the Montego Bay Marine Park to enter into such a<br />

venture.<br />

2.7.3 MODELLING RESULTS AND POLICY ADVICE<br />

FOR THE USE OF DECISION SUPPORT MODELS<br />

More generally, beyond the specific policy and institutional<br />

questions that arise when one considers the potential<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a bioprospecting program in<br />

Montego Bay, policy questions arise from the overall<br />

least cost intervention and coral reef benefit modelling<br />

results. Ruitenbeek & Cartier (1999) note that if economic<br />

efficiency is the goal, both costs and benefits<br />

must be considered in research when dealing with complex<br />

non-linear systems such as coral reefs. Cost-effectiveness<br />

analysis alone may not be adequate. Ruitenbeek<br />

192<br />

KENT GUSTAVSON & RICHARD M. HUBER:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!