10.02.2015 Views

Cesar2000-Economics of Coral Reefs.pdf

Cesar2000-Economics of Coral Reefs.pdf

Cesar2000-Economics of Coral Reefs.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Case Study 2: Sri Lanka<br />

The societal costs <strong>of</strong> coral mining presented in the study<br />

by Berg et al. (1998) were based on estimated losses in<br />

fisheries, tourism and coastal protection. The fisheries<br />

costs were based on the expected loss <strong>of</strong> fisheries income.<br />

The quantity <strong>of</strong> this loss was approximated by the maximum<br />

sustainable yield (MSY) <strong>of</strong> the reef fishery. This<br />

was estimated at 10 t km –2 yr –1 . The net fisheries income<br />

corresponding to this yield was estimated at between<br />

US$ 7800 and US$ 9800 km –2 reef yr –1 in 1994 prices.<br />

Coastal tourism is an important business in Sri Lanka.<br />

Based on an contingent valuation (CV) estimate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recreational use value, the tourism losses were estimated<br />

at US$ 214,000 km –2 reef yr –1 . Pr<strong>of</strong>its or financial revenues<br />

(FR) from coastal tourism were also considered.<br />

The economic losses to coastal protection were based on<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

–1000<br />

–2000<br />

–3000<br />

–4000<br />

–5000<br />

Net present<br />

benefit<br />

— coral minig<br />

Net present cost<br />

— fish habitat<br />

Net present cost<br />

— physical<br />

structure<br />

high estimate<br />

low estimate<br />

Net present cost<br />

— tourist<br />

attraction<br />

Figure 3. Costs and Benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>Coral</strong> Mining in Sri Lanka<br />

(US$ 1000 km –2 reef; 20 y.).<br />

a combination <strong>of</strong> preventive expenditures (PE), such as<br />

revetments and wave breakers, and losses in property<br />

value (PV). The annual cost for PV were estimated at<br />

between US$ 160 and US$ 172,000 km –2 reef yr –1 ,<br />

depending on land price and use, while the PE-approach<br />

gave a range <strong>of</strong> US$ 1,230,000 and US$ 4,180,000 km –2<br />

reef yr –1 , depending on the type <strong>of</strong> coastal protection<br />

structures used. These costs are graphically presented in<br />

figure 3.<br />

When the loosed values <strong>of</strong> the aforementioned three<br />

functions were added together by Berg et al. (1998),<br />

minimum estimates <strong>of</strong> the total quantifiable economic<br />

losses due to coral mining were in the range <strong>of</strong> US$<br />

13,000 to US$ 4,404,000 km –2 reef yr –1 (1994 prices).<br />

Calculated over twenty years, with a discount rate <strong>of</strong><br />

9%, the net present value <strong>of</strong> losses per km 2 would be<br />

US$ 142,000–US$ 7,504,000. Table 4 gives both these<br />

external costs and the pr<strong>of</strong>its from coral mining. The<br />

total pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> coral mining are US$ 749,000–1,671,000<br />

and the net economic costs are US$ 111,000–7,364,000<br />

in net present value terms over twenty years. This is<br />

shown in the last row <strong>of</strong> table 4 as the total accumulated<br />

benefits and costs in year 20.<br />

4. DISCUSSION<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper was to discuss possible ways <strong>of</strong><br />

assessing the costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> coral mining by comparing<br />

two sites that vary both in geographical and biological<br />

terms and in the sophistication <strong>of</strong> the mining<br />

industry. First, however, in order to make the results <strong>of</strong><br />

the studies more comparable, a modification <strong>of</strong> the Sri<br />

Lankan case is proposed. Thus far, the Sri Lanka study<br />

estimated the mining revenues by assuming the area to<br />

have 100% coral cover and 100% extraction efficiency.<br />

In the reefs in southern Sri Lanka, the live coral cover<br />

is actually in the range <strong>of</strong> 20–80% (Rajasuriya et al.<br />

1998). If the same calculation is applied with a coral<br />

cover <strong>of</strong> 50% and an extraction rate <strong>of</strong> 50%, total lime<br />

production then ranges between 4625 t and 10,325 t<br />

with corresponding pr<strong>of</strong>its ranging from US$ 48,100 to<br />

US$ 107,400. In net present value terms, the pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

90<br />

MARCUS C. ÖHMAN & HERMAN S. J. CESAR:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!