16.02.2015 Views

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prime age males do<br />

not work much more<br />

at lower marginal tax<br />

rates – but the labour<br />

supply of the young,<br />

the old <strong>and</strong> those with<br />

low incomes may be<br />

significantly affected<br />

by the average tax<br />

rate<br />

work?”). Both margins are important, but there is an emerging<br />

consensus among researchers that the “extensive” margin is more<br />

important for policy purposes.<br />

In other words, the effect of tax <strong>and</strong> social security parameters<br />

on the decision “shall I participate in the labour market?” is more<br />

important than the effects on the decision “how many hours shall<br />

I work, provided I have a job?”. <strong>The</strong> extensive margin is closely<br />

related to the age profile of individuals as well as their net contribution<br />

to the public sector. In terms of our figure 1.1 in chapter<br />

1, the key policy issues become: how to encourage the inflow of<br />

young people into the labour force <strong>and</strong> how to contain the outflow<br />

of elderly people into retirement?<br />

<strong>The</strong> importance of the extensive margin has only recently<br />

been appreciated in the scholarly literature <strong>and</strong> policy debate 3 .<br />

Traditional labour supply analysis has been mainly concerned with<br />

the labour supply elasticity of those working, <strong>and</strong> found it to be<br />

low. 4 <strong>The</strong> new str<strong>and</strong> of analysis, focussing on the extensive margin,<br />

is associated with significantly higher estimates of labour supply<br />

elasticities. This also leads to a different assessment of the role<br />

of taxes in inhibiting the supply of market work. <strong>The</strong> traditional<br />

textbook analysis of the choice of leisure versus work assumes that<br />

only the marginal tax rate (not the average tax rate) affects working<br />

hours. <strong>The</strong> new theoretical paradigm 5 , by contrast, emphasizes the<br />

connection between average taxes <strong>and</strong> labour supply (taking also<br />

into account the possible withdrawal of social benefits). It turns out<br />

that the importance of the extensive margin gives rise to a much<br />

more significant distortion in the choice between leisure <strong>and</strong> work<br />

than most economists have hitherto assumed. <strong>The</strong>se conclusions<br />

are reinforced by recent empirical research emphasizing the large<br />

participation response of certain subgroups of the population. In<br />

particular, the labour supply decisions of people at the lower end<br />

of the earnings distribution <strong>and</strong> of the young <strong>and</strong> the old (as well<br />

as of intersections of these groups, the low-skilled old <strong>and</strong> lowskilled<br />

young) may be influenced quite a lot by the design of tax,<br />

social protection <strong>and</strong> pensions systems 6 .<br />

Comparative data on participation rates suggest that a large<br />

part of the US-Europe gap in life cycle working hours is accounted<br />

for by different choices along the extensive margin, i.e. differences<br />

<strong>The</strong> labour market: enough workers working enough? · 107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!