16.02.2015 Views

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5.1<br />

Projections of public health <strong>and</strong> long-term care spending as per cent of GDP,<br />

2005 <strong>and</strong> 2050<br />

Health care Long-term care Total<br />

2005 2050 2050 2005 2050 2050 2005 2050 2050<br />

Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost<br />

pressure containment pressure containment pressure containment<br />

Denmark 5.3 8.8 7.0 2.6 4.1 3.3 7.9 12.9 10.3<br />

Finl<strong>and</strong> 3.4 7.0 5.2 2.9 5.2 4.2 6.2 12.2 10.3<br />

Norway 7.3 10.7 8.9 2.6 4.3 3.5 9.9 15.0 12.4<br />

Sweden 5.3 8.5 6.7 3.3 4.3 3.4 8.6 12.9 10.1<br />

OECD 5.7 9.6 7.7 1.1 3.3 2.4 6.7 12.8 10.1<br />

Source: Projecting OECD Health <strong>and</strong> Long-term care expenditures: What are the main drivers, OECD Economics Department<br />

Working Paper 477, 2006.<br />

<strong>and</strong> treatments as well as the relative cost increases are in focus,<br />

while the assumption on the income effect on service dem<strong>and</strong> is<br />

moderate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> table present two scenarios: “cost pressure” refers to the<br />

case where treatment costs rise more rapidly than income, while<br />

in the “cost containment” case this rise is assumed to moderate<br />

over time. 2 <strong>The</strong> message of the table is clear. <strong>The</strong> rise of expenditure<br />

is significant for both health <strong>and</strong> long-term care even in the<br />

optimistic scenario, in which cost containment is assumed. For<br />

Finl<strong>and</strong> there is an increase in spending from currently 6.2 per<br />

cent of GDP to 10.3 per cent – <strong>and</strong> if costs cannot be contained<br />

there will be a doubling.<br />

<strong>The</strong> key point is that the service challenge for public finances<br />

is caused by the combination of the cost (Baumol) <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong><br />

(Wagner) effect. More is wanted of services at the same time as<br />

they are becoming relatively more expensive to provide. <strong>The</strong><br />

reason why it is more difficult to address this problem for publicly<br />

than for privately provided services is the difference in the way in<br />

which dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supply are brought into balance. For privately<br />

produced services it is a matter for the individuals themselves to<br />

decide whether they want to spend a larger share of their income<br />

on these services or not. For public services the choice is much<br />

less clear to the citizens since the services are provided free (or at<br />

a heavily subsidized price), <strong>and</strong> hence policy makers are left with<br />

86 · <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong> <strong>Model</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!