16.02.2015 Views

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sectors, place at or above the median of the sample, which reveals<br />

considerable variation across countries. Unfortunately, the figure<br />

does not include local government expenditures. <strong>The</strong> role of private<br />

sector services has grown especially fast in local government<br />

where budget pressures have been most acute.<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose of engaging the private sector is to bring in more<br />

competition. <strong>The</strong> hoped for benefits from competition include better<br />

allocation of resources, lower cost of service, higher quality of<br />

service, more innovation <strong>and</strong> new business models – in short, all the<br />

virtues of competition we discussed earlier. However, these benefits<br />

will necessarily be limited by the government’s need to retain control<br />

so that its broader missions can be achieved <strong>and</strong> its legitimacy<br />

preserved. Many bureaucratic rules will continue to apply in the<br />

relationship between the private sector <strong>and</strong> the government. For<br />

instance, while a firm is free to choose whichever private service<br />

provider it wants based on whatever criteria it chooses, including<br />

very subjective ones, the government has to rely on transparent,<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are a lot of potential<br />

benefits from<br />

competition, but<br />

these will be limited<br />

by the government’s<br />

need to retain control<br />

of its broader mission<br />

Portugal<br />

Italy<br />

France<br />

Spain<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

Belgium<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Austria<br />

Denmark<br />

Canada<br />

Germany<br />

Icel<strong>and</strong><br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Finl<strong>and</strong><br />

Australia<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />

Sweden<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Norway<br />

United States<br />

United Kingdom<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

80 %<br />

Figure 8.1<br />

Outsourcing of government services, 2001<br />

Purchase of goods <strong>and</strong> services vs. in-house provision.<br />

Source: OECD Secretariat calculations based on GFS Data.<br />

146 · <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong> <strong>Model</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!