16.02.2015 Views

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that everyone gets their worth as measured by the value that the<br />

market puts on their contributions. Distributional issues have to<br />

be dealt with through taxation, social security <strong>and</strong> other government<br />

policies <strong>and</strong>, of course, through informal arrangements within<br />

families <strong>and</strong> communities.<br />

Distributional concerns underlie many public services, such as<br />

schooling <strong>and</strong> public health. A big reason why the public sectors<br />

in the <strong>Nordic</strong> countries are so large has to do with the perceived<br />

need for collective risk <strong>sharing</strong>, as we discussed earlier. <strong>The</strong> question<br />

that we will address here, however, is whether some of the<br />

services could be offered more cheaply through the private sector,<br />

even when the public sector finances them (partly or fully). This<br />

leads us to consider reasons for having publicly produced, not just<br />

publicly financed services.<br />

Competition enhances<br />

efficiency, distributional<br />

issues are a<br />

separate matter<br />

8.2 EXTERNAL EFFECTS AND PRIVATE<br />

ORGANIZATION<br />

In assessing the efficiency of coffee service, we only considered the<br />

value created for the shop owners <strong>and</strong> their customers. This is fine<br />

as long as the coffee business does not harm or benefit anyone else.<br />

If the coffee shops disturb the neighborhood at night, or if they<br />

bring more shoppers to the neighborhood during the day, profit<br />

maximization will not take into account all social benefits <strong>and</strong><br />

costs. <strong>The</strong>re would be external effects, or externalities.<br />

In economic textbooks, externalities are always paired with<br />

government intervention of some kind. It could involve corrective<br />

taxes as in the case of congestion, or new property rights such as<br />

tradable “pollution rights,” that force the firms to bear the external<br />

costs <strong>and</strong> benefits that they cause. Other externalities can rationalize<br />

publicly provided services, as we will discuss shortly. But it is<br />

important to note first that firms can “internalize” many externalities<br />

on their own, without the need of government. Indeed, the very<br />

existence of firms <strong>and</strong> the determination of the lines of business<br />

that they pursue are in large part driven by the value of internal<br />

coordination of activities that decentralized market trades would<br />

Governments <strong>and</strong><br />

firms are both designed<br />

to deal with<br />

externalities – but of<br />

very different kinds<br />

138 · <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong> <strong>Model</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!