07.05.2015 Views

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries<br />

1990s, which limited <strong>AIG</strong>’s ability to respond to emerging market opment in 2005, but experienced slightly favorable development in<br />

trends as rapidly as would otherwise be the case. In subsequent 2006 and more significantly favorable development in <strong>2007</strong>. The<br />

years, <strong>AIG</strong> responded to these emerging trends by increasing adverse development in 2005 related principally to accident years<br />

rates and implementing numerous policy form and coverage 2002 and prior. This adverse development resulted from significhanges.<br />

This led to a significant improvement in experience cant loss cost escalation due to a variety of factors, including the<br />

beginning with accident year 2001. In <strong>2007</strong>, a significant portion following: the increase in frequency and severity of corporate<br />

of the adverse development from accident years 2002 and prior bankruptcies; the increase in frequency of financial statement<br />

also related to other latent exposures, including pharmaceutical restatements; the sharp rise in market capitalization of publicly<br />

and product aggregate-related exposures as well as the construc- traded <strong>com</strong>panies; and the increase in the number of initial public<br />

tion defect exposures noted above. <strong>AIG</strong>’s exposure to these latent offerings, which led to an unprecedented number of IPO allocaexposures<br />

was sharply reduced after 2002 due to significant tion/laddering suits in 2001. In addition, extensive utilization of<br />

changes in policy terms and conditions as well as underwriting multi-year policies during this period limited <strong>AIG</strong>’s ability to<br />

guidelines.<br />

respond to emerging trends as rapidly as would otherwise be the<br />

For the year-end 2005 loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries case. <strong>AIG</strong> experienced significant adverse loss development during<br />

responded to the continuing adverse development by further the period 2002 through 2005 as a result of these issues. <strong>AIG</strong><br />

increasing the loss development factors applicable to accident responded to this development with rate increases and policy<br />

years 1999 and subsequent by approximately 5 percent. In<br />

form and coverage changes to better contain future loss costs in<br />

addition, to more accurately estimate losses for construction this class of business.<br />

defect-related claims, a separate review was performed by <strong>AIG</strong> For the year-end 2005 loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries<br />

claims staff for accounts with significant exposure to these<br />

responded to the continuing adverse development by further<br />

claims.<br />

increasing the loss development factor assumptions. The loss<br />

For the year-end 2006 loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong> claims staff development factors applicable to 1997 and subsequent accident<br />

updated the separate review for accounts with significant expo- years were increased by approximately 4 percent. In addition,<br />

sure to construction defect-related claims in order to assist the <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries began to give greater weight to loss development<br />

actuaries in determining the proper reserve for this exposure. methods for accident years 2002 and 2003, in order to more fully<br />

<strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries determined that no significant changes in the respond to the recent loss experience. <strong>AIG</strong>’s claims staff also<br />

assumptions were required. Prior accident year loss development conducted a series of ground-up claim projections covering all<br />

in 2006 was adverse by approximately $100 million, a relatively open claims for this business through accident year 2004. <strong>AIG</strong>’s<br />

minor amount for this class of business. However, <strong>AIG</strong> continued actuaries benchmarked the loss reserve indications for all<br />

to experience adverse development for this class for accident accident years through 2004 to these claim projections.<br />

years prior to 2003.<br />

For the year-end 2006 loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries<br />

For the year-end <strong>2007</strong> loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong> claims staff determined that no significant changes in the assumptions were<br />

updated its review of accounts with significant exposure to<br />

required. Prior accident year loss development in 2006 was<br />

construction defect-related claims. <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries determined favorable by approximately $20 million, an insignificant amount for<br />

that no significant changes in the assumptions were required. these classes. <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries continued to benchmark the loss<br />

Prior accident year loss developments in <strong>2007</strong> were adverse by reserve indications to the ground-up claim projections provided by<br />

approximately $75 million, a minor amount for this class of <strong>AIG</strong> claims staff for this class of business. For the year-end 2006<br />

business. However, <strong>AIG</strong> continued to experience adverse develop- loss reserve review, the ground-up claim projections included all<br />

ment in this class for accident years 2002 and prior, amounting accident years through 2005.<br />

to approximately $450 million in <strong>2007</strong>. In addition, loss reserves For the year-end <strong>2007</strong> loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries<br />

developed adversely for accident year 2003 by approximately determined that no significant changes in the assumptions were<br />

$100 million in <strong>2007</strong> for this class. The loss ratio for accident required. Prior accident year reserve development in <strong>2007</strong> was<br />

year 2003 remains very favorable for this class and has been favorable by approximately $305 million, due primarily to favorable<br />

relatively stable over the past several years. Favorable develop- development from accident years 2004 and 2005, and to a lesser<br />

ments in <strong>2007</strong> for accident years 2004 through 2006 largely extent 2003 and 2006. <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries continued to benchmark<br />

offset the adverse developments from accident years 2003 and the loss reserve indications to the ground-up claim projections<br />

prior. A significant portion of the adverse development from provided by <strong>AIG</strong> claims staff for this class of business. For the<br />

accident years 2002 and prior related to the latent exposures year-end <strong>2007</strong> loss reserve review, the ground-up claim projecdescribed<br />

above.<br />

tions included all accident years through 2006, and included<br />

Loss reserves pertaining to the excess casualty class of stock options backdating-related exposures from accident year<br />

business are generally included in the other liability occurrence 2006. Accident year 2006 reserves developed favorably notwithline<br />

of business, with a small portion of the excess casualty standing the effect of claims relating to stock options backdating,<br />

reserves included in the other liability claims made line of<br />

which totaled approximately $300 million. Further, <strong>AIG</strong> is closely<br />

business, as presented in the table above.<br />

monitoring claims activity in accident year <strong>2007</strong> relating to the<br />

U.S. residential mortgage market, consistent with the manner in<br />

D&O and Related Management Liability Classes of Business:<br />

which claims relating to stock options backdating were monitored<br />

These classes of business experienced significant adverse devel-<br />

<strong>AIG</strong> <strong>2007</strong> Form 10-K 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!