2007 Annual Report - AIG.com
2007 Annual Report - AIG.com
2007 Annual Report - AIG.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries<br />
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued<br />
12. Commitments, Contingencies and<br />
Guarantees<br />
the settlement agreements and continues to deny the allegations.<br />
Nevertheless, <strong>AIG</strong> agreed to settle in order to avoid the expense<br />
Continued<br />
and uncertainty of protracted litigation. The settlement agreements,<br />
which remain subject to court approvals, were reached<br />
States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on October 10, <strong>2007</strong>.<br />
with the Attorneys General of the States of Florida, Hawaii,<br />
Several similar actions that were consolidated before Chief Judge<br />
Maryland, Michigan, Oregon, Texas and West Virginia, the Com-<br />
Brown are still pending in the District Court. Those actions are<br />
monwealths of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, and the District<br />
currently stayed pending a decision by the court on whether they<br />
of Columbia, the Florida Department of Financial Services, and<br />
will proceed during the appeal of the dismissal of the Second<br />
the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation. The agreement with the<br />
Commercial Complaint and the Second Employee Benefits<br />
Texas Attorney General also settles allegations of anti<strong>com</strong>petitive<br />
Complaint.<br />
conduct relating to <strong>AIG</strong>’s relationship with Allied World Assurance<br />
On August 24, <strong>2007</strong>, the Ohio Attorney General filed a<br />
Company and includes an additional settlement payment of<br />
<strong>com</strong>plaint in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas against <strong>AIG</strong> and a<br />
$500,000 related thereto.<br />
number of its subsidiaries, as well as several other broker and<br />
Wells Notices. <strong>AIG</strong> understands that some of its employees<br />
insurer defendants, asserting violation of Ohio’s antitrust laws.<br />
have received Wells notices in connection with previously dis-<br />
The <strong>com</strong>plaint, which is similar to the Second Commercial<br />
closed SEC investigations of certain of <strong>AIG</strong>’s transactions or<br />
Complaint, alleges that <strong>AIG</strong> and the other broker and insurer<br />
accounting practices. Under SEC procedures, a Wells notice is an<br />
defendants conspired to allocate customers, divide markets, and<br />
indication that the SEC staff has made a preliminary decision to<br />
restrain <strong>com</strong>petition in <strong>com</strong>mercial lines of casualty insurance<br />
re<strong>com</strong>mend enforcement action that provides recipients with an<br />
sold through the broker defendant. The <strong>com</strong>plaint seeks treble<br />
opportunity to respond to the SEC staff before a formal<br />
damages on behalf of Ohio public purchasers of <strong>com</strong>mercial<br />
re<strong>com</strong>mendation is finalized. It is possible that additional current<br />
casualty insurance, disgorgement on behalf of both public and<br />
and former employees could receive similar notices in the future<br />
private purchasers of <strong>com</strong>mercial casualty insurance, as well as a<br />
as the regulatory investigations proceed.<br />
$500 per day penalty for each day of conspiratorial conduct. <strong>AIG</strong>,<br />
along with other co-defendants, moved to dismiss the <strong>com</strong>plaint<br />
on November 16, <strong>2007</strong>. Discovery is stayed in the case pending<br />
Effect on <strong>AIG</strong><br />
a ruling on the motion to dismiss or until May 15, 2008,<br />
In the opinion of <strong>AIG</strong> management, <strong>AIG</strong>’s ultimate liability for the<br />
whichever occurs first.<br />
unresolved litigation and investigation matters referred to above is<br />
SICO. In July, 2005, SICO filed a <strong>com</strong>plaint against <strong>AIG</strong> in the not likely to have a material adverse effect on <strong>AIG</strong>’s consolidated<br />
Southern District of New York, claiming that <strong>AIG</strong> had refused to financial condition, although it is possible that the effect would be<br />
provide SICO access to certain artwork and asked the court to material to <strong>AIG</strong>’s consolidated results of operations for an<br />
order <strong>AIG</strong> immediately to release the property to SICO. <strong>AIG</strong> filed individual reporting period.<br />
an answer denying SICO’s allegations and setting forth defenses<br />
to SICO’s claims. In addition, <strong>AIG</strong> filed counterclaims asserting<br />
(b) Commitments<br />
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of<br />
fiduciary duty, a constructive trust and declaratory judgment,<br />
Flight Equipment<br />
relating to SICO’s breach of its <strong>com</strong>mitment to use its <strong>AIG</strong> shares At December 31, <strong>2007</strong>, ILFC had <strong>com</strong>mitted to purchase 234 new<br />
only for the benefit of <strong>AIG</strong> and <strong>AIG</strong> employees. Fact and expert aircraft deliverable from 2008 through 2017 at an estimated<br />
discovery has been concluded and SICO’s motion for summary aggregate purchase price of $20.1 billion. ILFC will be required to<br />
judgment is pending.<br />
find customers for any aircraft acquired, and it must arrange<br />
Regulatory Investigations. Regulators from several states have financing for portions of the purchase price of such equipment.<br />
<strong>com</strong>menced investigations into insurance brokerage practices<br />
Minimum future rental in<strong>com</strong>e on noncancelable operating<br />
related to contingent <strong>com</strong>missions and other industry wide<br />
leases of flight equipment which have been delivered at<br />
practices as well as other broker-related conduct, such as alleged<br />
December 31, <strong>2007</strong> was as follows:<br />
bid-rigging. In addition, various federal, state and foreign regulatory<br />
and governmental agencies are reviewing certain transactions (in millions)<br />
and practices of <strong>AIG</strong> and its subsidiaries in connection with 2008 $ 4,142<br />
industry wide and other inquiries. <strong>AIG</strong> has cooperated, and will 2009 3,783<br />
continue to cooperate, in producing documents and other informa- 2010 3,274<br />
tion in response to subpoenas and other requests. On Janu- 2011 2,726<br />
ary 29, 2008, <strong>AIG</strong> reached settlement agreements with nine 2012 2,075<br />
states and the District of Columbia. The settlement agreements Remaining years after 2012 4,921<br />
call for <strong>AIG</strong> to pay a total of $12.5 million to be allocated among Total $20,921<br />
the ten jurisdictions and also require <strong>AIG</strong> to continue to maintain<br />
certain producer <strong>com</strong>pensation disclosure and ongoing <strong>com</strong>pliance<br />
initiatives. <strong>AIG</strong> will also continue to cooperate with these states in<br />
their ongoing investigations. <strong>AIG</strong> has not admitted liability under<br />
Flight equipment is leased, under operating leases, with<br />
remaining terms ranging from 1 to 12 years.<br />
178 <strong>AIG</strong> <strong>2007</strong> Form 10-K