07.05.2015 Views

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries<br />

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued<br />

12. Commitments, Contingencies and<br />

Guarantees<br />

the settlement agreements and continues to deny the allegations.<br />

Nevertheless, <strong>AIG</strong> agreed to settle in order to avoid the expense<br />

Continued<br />

and uncertainty of protracted litigation. The settlement agreements,<br />

which remain subject to court approvals, were reached<br />

States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on October 10, <strong>2007</strong>.<br />

with the Attorneys General of the States of Florida, Hawaii,<br />

Several similar actions that were consolidated before Chief Judge<br />

Maryland, Michigan, Oregon, Texas and West Virginia, the Com-<br />

Brown are still pending in the District Court. Those actions are<br />

monwealths of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, and the District<br />

currently stayed pending a decision by the court on whether they<br />

of Columbia, the Florida Department of Financial Services, and<br />

will proceed during the appeal of the dismissal of the Second<br />

the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation. The agreement with the<br />

Commercial Complaint and the Second Employee Benefits<br />

Texas Attorney General also settles allegations of anti<strong>com</strong>petitive<br />

Complaint.<br />

conduct relating to <strong>AIG</strong>’s relationship with Allied World Assurance<br />

On August 24, <strong>2007</strong>, the Ohio Attorney General filed a<br />

Company and includes an additional settlement payment of<br />

<strong>com</strong>plaint in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas against <strong>AIG</strong> and a<br />

$500,000 related thereto.<br />

number of its subsidiaries, as well as several other broker and<br />

Wells Notices. <strong>AIG</strong> understands that some of its employees<br />

insurer defendants, asserting violation of Ohio’s antitrust laws.<br />

have received Wells notices in connection with previously dis-<br />

The <strong>com</strong>plaint, which is similar to the Second Commercial<br />

closed SEC investigations of certain of <strong>AIG</strong>’s transactions or<br />

Complaint, alleges that <strong>AIG</strong> and the other broker and insurer<br />

accounting practices. Under SEC procedures, a Wells notice is an<br />

defendants conspired to allocate customers, divide markets, and<br />

indication that the SEC staff has made a preliminary decision to<br />

restrain <strong>com</strong>petition in <strong>com</strong>mercial lines of casualty insurance<br />

re<strong>com</strong>mend enforcement action that provides recipients with an<br />

sold through the broker defendant. The <strong>com</strong>plaint seeks treble<br />

opportunity to respond to the SEC staff before a formal<br />

damages on behalf of Ohio public purchasers of <strong>com</strong>mercial<br />

re<strong>com</strong>mendation is finalized. It is possible that additional current<br />

casualty insurance, disgorgement on behalf of both public and<br />

and former employees could receive similar notices in the future<br />

private purchasers of <strong>com</strong>mercial casualty insurance, as well as a<br />

as the regulatory investigations proceed.<br />

$500 per day penalty for each day of conspiratorial conduct. <strong>AIG</strong>,<br />

along with other co-defendants, moved to dismiss the <strong>com</strong>plaint<br />

on November 16, <strong>2007</strong>. Discovery is stayed in the case pending<br />

Effect on <strong>AIG</strong><br />

a ruling on the motion to dismiss or until May 15, 2008,<br />

In the opinion of <strong>AIG</strong> management, <strong>AIG</strong>’s ultimate liability for the<br />

whichever occurs first.<br />

unresolved litigation and investigation matters referred to above is<br />

SICO. In July, 2005, SICO filed a <strong>com</strong>plaint against <strong>AIG</strong> in the not likely to have a material adverse effect on <strong>AIG</strong>’s consolidated<br />

Southern District of New York, claiming that <strong>AIG</strong> had refused to financial condition, although it is possible that the effect would be<br />

provide SICO access to certain artwork and asked the court to material to <strong>AIG</strong>’s consolidated results of operations for an<br />

order <strong>AIG</strong> immediately to release the property to SICO. <strong>AIG</strong> filed individual reporting period.<br />

an answer denying SICO’s allegations and setting forth defenses<br />

to SICO’s claims. In addition, <strong>AIG</strong> filed counterclaims asserting<br />

(b) Commitments<br />

breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of<br />

fiduciary duty, a constructive trust and declaratory judgment,<br />

Flight Equipment<br />

relating to SICO’s breach of its <strong>com</strong>mitment to use its <strong>AIG</strong> shares At December 31, <strong>2007</strong>, ILFC had <strong>com</strong>mitted to purchase 234 new<br />

only for the benefit of <strong>AIG</strong> and <strong>AIG</strong> employees. Fact and expert aircraft deliverable from 2008 through 2017 at an estimated<br />

discovery has been concluded and SICO’s motion for summary aggregate purchase price of $20.1 billion. ILFC will be required to<br />

judgment is pending.<br />

find customers for any aircraft acquired, and it must arrange<br />

Regulatory Investigations. Regulators from several states have financing for portions of the purchase price of such equipment.<br />

<strong>com</strong>menced investigations into insurance brokerage practices<br />

Minimum future rental in<strong>com</strong>e on noncancelable operating<br />

related to contingent <strong>com</strong>missions and other industry wide<br />

leases of flight equipment which have been delivered at<br />

practices as well as other broker-related conduct, such as alleged<br />

December 31, <strong>2007</strong> was as follows:<br />

bid-rigging. In addition, various federal, state and foreign regulatory<br />

and governmental agencies are reviewing certain transactions (in millions)<br />

and practices of <strong>AIG</strong> and its subsidiaries in connection with 2008 $ 4,142<br />

industry wide and other inquiries. <strong>AIG</strong> has cooperated, and will 2009 3,783<br />

continue to cooperate, in producing documents and other informa- 2010 3,274<br />

tion in response to subpoenas and other requests. On Janu- 2011 2,726<br />

ary 29, 2008, <strong>AIG</strong> reached settlement agreements with nine 2012 2,075<br />

states and the District of Columbia. The settlement agreements Remaining years after 2012 4,921<br />

call for <strong>AIG</strong> to pay a total of $12.5 million to be allocated among Total $20,921<br />

the ten jurisdictions and also require <strong>AIG</strong> to continue to maintain<br />

certain producer <strong>com</strong>pensation disclosure and ongoing <strong>com</strong>pliance<br />

initiatives. <strong>AIG</strong> will also continue to cooperate with these states in<br />

their ongoing investigations. <strong>AIG</strong> has not admitted liability under<br />

Flight equipment is leased, under operating leases, with<br />

remaining terms ranging from 1 to 12 years.<br />

178 <strong>AIG</strong> <strong>2007</strong> Form 10-K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!