2007 Annual Report - AIG.com
2007 Annual Report - AIG.com
2007 Annual Report - AIG.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries<br />
in<strong>com</strong>e of the Capital Markets operations and the percentage<br />
The unrealized market valuation losses related to <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s<br />
change in these amounts for any given period are significantly super senior credit default swap portfolio, the preponderance of<br />
affected by the number, size and profitability of transactions which relates to credit derivatives written on multi-sector CDO<br />
entered into during that period relative to those entered into super senior tranches, were as follows:<br />
during the prior period. Generally, the realization of transaction<br />
Three months ended<br />
Year ended<br />
revenues as measured by the receipt of funds is not a significant (in millions) December 31, <strong>2007</strong> December 31, <strong>2007</strong><br />
reporting event as the gain or loss on <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s trading transactions<br />
Multi-sector CDO $10,894 $11,246<br />
is currently reflected in operating in<strong>com</strong>e as the fair values change<br />
Corporate Debt/CLOs 226 226<br />
from period to period.<br />
<strong>AIG</strong>FP’s products generally require sophisticated models and<br />
Total $11,120 $11,472<br />
significant management assumptions to determine fair values and, Included in <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s net operating loss was a net unrealized<br />
particularly during times of market disruption, the absence of market valuation gain of $401 million on certain credit default<br />
observable market data can result in fair values at any given swaps and embedded credit derivatives in credit-linked notes in<br />
balance sheet date which are not indicative of the ultimate<br />
<strong>2007</strong>. In these transactions, <strong>AIG</strong>FP purchased protection at the<br />
settlement values of the products.<br />
AAA- to BBB-rated risk layers on portfolios of reference obligations<br />
Beginning in <strong>2007</strong>, <strong>AIG</strong>FP applied hedge accounting under that include multi-sector CDO obligations.<br />
FAS 133 to certain of its interest rate swaps and foreign currency During the fourth quarter of <strong>2007</strong>, certain of <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s available<br />
forward contracts hedging its investments and borrowings. As a for sale investments in super senior and AAA-rated bonds issued<br />
result, <strong>AIG</strong>FP recognized in earnings the change in the fair value by multi-sector CDOs experienced severe declines in their fair<br />
on the hedged items attributable to the hedged risks substantially value. As a result, <strong>AIG</strong>FP recorded an other-than-temporary<br />
offsetting the gains and losses on the derivatives designated as impairment charge in other in<strong>com</strong>e of $643 million. Notwithstandhedges.<br />
Prior to <strong>2007</strong>, <strong>AIG</strong>FP did not apply hedge accounting ing <strong>AIG</strong>’s intent and ability to hold such securities until they<br />
under FAS 133 to any of its derivatives or related assets and recover in value, and despite structures which indicate that a<br />
liabilities. For further information on the effect of FAS 133 on substantial amount of the securities should continue to perform in<br />
<strong>AIG</strong>FP’s business, see Risk Management — Segment Risk Man- accordance with their original terms, <strong>AIG</strong> concluded that it could<br />
agement — Financial Services — Capital Markets Derivative Trans- not reasonably assert that the recovery period would be tempoactions<br />
and Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements.<br />
rary. See also Invested Assets — Financial Services Invested<br />
Effective January 1, 2008, <strong>AIG</strong>FP elected to apply the fair Assets and Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements.<br />
value option to all eligible assets and liabilities, other than equity The change in fair value of <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s credit default swaps that<br />
method investments. Electing the fair value option will allow <strong>AIG</strong>FP reference CDOs and the decline in fair value of its investments in<br />
to more closely align its earnings with the economics of its<br />
CDOs were caused by the significant widening in spreads in the<br />
transactions by recognizing the change in fair value on its<br />
fourth quarter on asset-backed securities, principally those related<br />
derivatives and the offsetting change in fair value of the assets to U.S. residential mortgages, the severe liquidity crisis affecting<br />
and liabilities being hedged concurrently through earnings. The the structured finance markets and the effects of rating agency<br />
adoption of FAS 159 with respect to elections made by <strong>AIG</strong>FP is downgrades on those securities. <strong>AIG</strong> continues to believe that<br />
currently being evaluated for the effect of recently issued draft these unrealized market valuation losses are not indicative of the<br />
guidance by the FASB, anticipated to be issued in final form in losses <strong>AIG</strong>FP may realize over time on this portfolio. Based upon<br />
early 2008, and its potential effect on <strong>AIG</strong>’s consolidated financial its most current analyses, <strong>AIG</strong> believes that any credit impairment<br />
statements.<br />
losses realized over time by <strong>AIG</strong>FP will not be material to <strong>AIG</strong>’s<br />
consolidated financial condition, although it is possible that such<br />
Capital Markets Results<br />
realized losses could be material to <strong>AIG</strong>’s consolidated results of<br />
<strong>2007</strong> and 2006 Comparison<br />
operations for an individual reporting period.<br />
In addition, in <strong>2007</strong> <strong>AIG</strong>FP recognized a net gain of $211 mil-<br />
Capital Markets reported an operating loss in <strong>2007</strong> <strong>com</strong>pared to lion related to hedging activities that did not qualify for hedge<br />
operating in<strong>com</strong>e in 2006, primarily due to fourth quarter <strong>2007</strong> accounting treatment under FAS 133, <strong>com</strong>pared to a net loss of<br />
unrealized market valuation losses related to <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s super senior $1.82 billion in 2006.<br />
credit default swap portfolio principally written on multi-sector<br />
The year ended December 31, <strong>2007</strong> included an out of period<br />
CDOs and an other-than-temporary impairment charge on <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s charge of $380 million to reverse net gains recognized in previous<br />
investment portfolio of CDOs of ABS. These losses were partially periods on transfers of available for sale securities among legal<br />
offset by the effect of applying hedge accounting to certain<br />
entities consolidated within <strong>AIG</strong>FP, and a $166 million reduction in<br />
hedging activities beginning in <strong>2007</strong>, as described below, and net fair value at March 31, <strong>2007</strong> of certain derivatives that were an<br />
unrealized market gains related to certain credit default swaps integral part of, and economically hedge, the structured transacpurchased<br />
against the AAA to BBB-rated risk layers on portfolios tions that were potentially affected by the proposed regulations<br />
of reference obligations. <strong>AIG</strong>FP experienced higher transaction flow issued by the U.S. Treasury Department discussed above in<br />
in <strong>2007</strong> in its rate and currency products which contributed to its Overview of Operations and Business Results — Outlook. The net<br />
revenues.<br />
loss on <strong>AIG</strong>FP’s derivatives recognized in 2006 included an out of<br />
<strong>AIG</strong> <strong>2007</strong> Form 10-K 83