07.05.2015 Views

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

2007 Annual Report - AIG.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries<br />

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of<br />

Financial Condition and Results of Operations Continued<br />

in 2006, and believes that its reserves as of December 31, <strong>2007</strong> required. Prior accident year development in <strong>2007</strong> was favorable<br />

are adequate for its D&O and related management liability classes by approximately $15 million, an insignificant amount for this<br />

of business.<br />

class.<br />

Loss reserves pertaining to D&O and related management<br />

liability classes of business are included in the other liability Overview of Loss Reserving Process<br />

claims made line of business, as presented in the table above.<br />

The General Insurance loss reserves can generally be categorized<br />

Excess Workers Compensation: This class of business exper- into two distinct groups. One group is short-tail classes of<br />

ienced significant adverse development in 2005, a relatively minor business consisting principally of property, personal lines and<br />

amount of adverse development in 2006, and a minor amount of certain casualty classes. The other group is long-tail casualty<br />

favorable development in <strong>2007</strong>. The adverse development in classes of business which includes excess and umbrella liability,<br />

2005 related to 2002 and prior accident years. This adverse D&O, professional liability, medical malpractice, workers <strong>com</strong>pendevelopment<br />

resulted primarily from significant loss cost in-<br />

sation, general liability, products liability, and related classes.<br />

creases, primarily attributable to rapidly increasing medical inflation<br />

and advances in medical care, which increased the cost of Short-Tail Reserves<br />

covered medical care and extended the life span of severely<br />

For operations writing short-tail coverages, such as property<br />

injured workers. The effect of these factors on excess workers<br />

coverages, the process of recording quarterly loss reserves is<br />

<strong>com</strong>pensation claims experience is leveraged, as frequency is<br />

generally geared toward maintaining an appropriate reserve for the<br />

increased by the rising number of claims that reach the excess<br />

outstanding exposure, rather than determining an expected loss<br />

layers.<br />

ratio for current business. For example, the IBNR reserve required<br />

In response to the significantly adverse loss development in<br />

for a class of property business might be expected to approximate<br />

2005, an additional study was conducted for the 2005 year-end<br />

20 percent of the latest year’s earned premiums, and this level of<br />

actuarial reserve analysis for DBG pertaining to the selection of<br />

reserve would generally be maintained regardless of the loss ratio<br />

loss development factors for this class of business. Claims for<br />

emerging in the current quarter. The 20 percent factor would be<br />

excess workers <strong>com</strong>pensation exhibit an exceptionally long-tail of<br />

adjusted to reflect changes in rate levels, loss reporting patterns,<br />

loss development, running for decades from the date the loss is<br />

known exposure to unreported losses, or other factors affecting<br />

incurred. Thus, the adequacy of loss reserves for this class is<br />

the particular class of business.<br />

sensitive to the estimated loss development factors, as such<br />

factors may be applied to many years of loss experience. In order<br />

to better estimate the tail development for this class, <strong>AIG</strong> claims<br />

Long-Tail Reserves<br />

staff conducted a claim-by-claim projection of the expected<br />

Estimation of ultimate net losses and loss expenses (net losses)<br />

ultimate paid loss for each open claim for 1998 and prior<br />

for long-tail casualty classes of business is a <strong>com</strong>plex process<br />

accident years as these are the primary years from which the tail and depends on a number of factors, including the class and<br />

factors are derived. The objective of the study was to provide a volume of business involved. Experience in the more recent<br />

benchmark against which loss development factors in the tail accident years of long-tail casualty classes of business shows<br />

could be evaluated. The resulting loss development factors utilized limited statistical credibility in reported net losses because a<br />

by the actuaries in the year-end 2005 study reflected an increase relatively low proportion of net losses would be reported claims<br />

of approximately 18 percent from the factors used in the prior and expenses and an even smaller percentage would be net<br />

year study without the benefit of the claims benchmark. In<br />

losses paid. Therefore, IBNR would constitute a relatively high<br />

addition, the loss cost trend assumption for excess workers proportion of net losses.<br />

<strong>com</strong>pensation was increased from approximately 2.5 percent to <strong>AIG</strong>’s carried net long-tail loss reserves are tested using loss<br />

6 percent for the 2005 study. trend factors that <strong>AIG</strong> considers appropriate for each class of<br />

For the year-end 2006 loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong> claims staff business. A variety of actuarial methods and assumptions is<br />

updated the claim-by-claim projection for each open claim for normally employed to estimate net losses for long-tail casualty<br />

accident years 1999 and prior. These updated claims projections classes of businesses. These methods ordinarily involve the use<br />

were utilized by the actuaries as a benchmark for loss develop- of loss trend factors intended to reflect the annual growth in loss<br />

ment factors in the year-end 2006 study. <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries<br />

costs from one accident year to the next. For the majority of longdetermined<br />

that no significant changes in the assumptions were tail casualty classes of business, net loss trend factors approxirequired.<br />

Prior accident year development in 2006 was adverse by mated five percent. Loss trend factors reflect many items<br />

approximately $70 million, a relatively minor amount for this including changes in claims handling, exposure and policy forms,<br />

class.<br />

current and future estimates of monetary inflation and social<br />

For the year-end <strong>2007</strong> loss reserve review, <strong>AIG</strong> claims staff inflation and increases in litigation and awards. These factors are<br />

again updated the claim-by-claim projection for each open claim periodically reviewed and adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect<br />

for accident years 2000 and prior. These updated claims<br />

emerging trends which are based upon past loss experience.<br />

projections were utilized by the actuaries as a benchmark for loss Thus, many factors are implicitly considered in estimating the year<br />

development factors in the year-end <strong>2007</strong> study. <strong>AIG</strong>’s actuaries to year growth in loss costs.<br />

determined that no significant changes in the assumptions were<br />

52 <strong>AIG</strong> <strong>2007</strong> Form 10-K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!