rules and regulations of gbpihed - Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(ii) (iii) the APAR form, the report written by Reporting Officer may be placed before the APAR Normalisation Committee and the grading as awarded by ‘APAR Normalisation Committee’ to be communicated to the employee concerned as in any other cases when report has been reviewed by the Reviewing Officer. In the absence of both reporting and reviewing in the APAR for any particular year, an ‘averaged grading’ on the basis of all the APARs available for past years in the same group and grade held by the individual may be taken for calculating the APAR marks for that particular year for which APAR was not filled in; and The APAR for any particular period cannot be filled in at a later stage by any officer who had not been authorised to act as Reporting or Reviewing Officer during that relevant period in respect of the concerned scientist. Such cases may be regulated as per item (i) or (ii) above as the case may be. The best course will always be to ensure that both the Reporting and Reviewing Officers fill in all the reports, which are due. 5.4 Constitution of the Normalisation Committee for APAR grading a. The normalisation committee should be constituted under the Chairmanship of the seniormost Scientist of the Institute so that the dispute, if any relating to the gradings awarded by the Committee could be considered by the Director at the Institute level in his capacity as the appellate/decision making authority. b. Further with the introduction of the normalisation of the grading by the Committee as above the critical appraisal by reporting and reviewing officer, the grade awarded by the Committee will now be communicated to the scientists. In view of the revised procedure, the proforma for recording the appraisal by the Reviewing Officer has also accordingly been modified. c. The critical appreciation and grad awarded by the Normalisation Committee shall be communicated to the employee. If the employee has any representation to make against the grading communicated to him, he/she may respond in writing within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of communication by him/her. The representation thus made will be considered by the competent authority and the employee will be informed of the final decision, wherever necessary. The employee may seek an interview with the competent authority. However, no further representation will lie against the final decision of the competent authority. 5.5 If the employee has served under more than one Reporting Officer during the period, appraisal by each Reporting Officer should be given separately. And cumulative score shall be considered for grading. 5.6 As the Director of the Institute himself being the decision making authority in respect of any disputes arising out of the grading awarded by the Normalization Committee, the APARs reviewed by him will not be subject to any further normalisation/ review by the 136
Committee. In such cases the grading awarded by the Director of the Institute will only be communicated to the scientist concerned. 5.7 However, as far as practical the R & D work in the Institute shall be structured in such a way that the Reporting /Reviewing authorities at least up to the level of Scientist D or equivalent are below the level of the Head of the Institute or designated authority so that disputes if any, arising in future are settled at the level of the Head of the Institute. 6.0 Part –V Remarks of Accepting Authority 6.1 This Section is to be filled by the accepting authority. He/she is required to indicate if he/she agrees with the assessments made by the reporting authority/reviewing authorities. In case of difference of opinion, he/she is required to give details and reasons for the same in the column specifically provided for the purpose in the table in Section V. 7. Outputs and Numerical Grades 7.1 The finalisation of expected output to be set at the beginning of the year will be the responsibility of the reporting officer who will set these targets in consultation with the scientists report upon. While setting the item-wise targets priorities should be assigned to each categories of items in terms of weightage reflected in APAR performance Index, i.e. Research outputs, Training, demonstration, and Advisory services, etc. considering the nature and area of work. Due care will be taken by the reporting Officer in bringing objectivity and equity in finalizing the targets. 7.2 In the APAR Part II and III, outputs are weighted in terms of numerical grades are to be estimated and finalized by the reporting and review authorities based on the inputs given by the Scientist reported upon. The total score is to be given out of 100, apportioning it according to the relative weightage for each component. It is expected that final grading of scientists (against work output or attributes or overall grade) would be adequately justified in the pen-picture by way of specific failures and specific accomplishments. In awarding a final numerical grade the reporting, reviewing/ normalizing committee and accepting authorities should rate the scientist against the outputs of a larger population of his/her peers that may be currently working under them or would have worked under them in the past. 7.3 The overall grade will be based on the addition of the weighted mean value of each group of indicators in proportion to weightage assigned. 8. Disclosure 8.1 There should be more openness in the system of appraisal. The APAR, including the overall grade and integrity, should be communicated to the officer reported upon after it has been finalized by the accepting authority. 8.2. The scientist reported upon may have the option to give his comments on the evaluation 137
Page 1 and 2:
RULES AND REGULATIONS OF GOVIND BAL
Page 3 and 4:
CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1.1. Short ti
Page 5 and 6:
4. The Director shall be the Princi
Page 7 and 8:
CHAPTER III BANK ACCOUNTS, FINANCIA
Page 9 and 10:
4.5. Salaries and allowances of emp
Page 11 and 12:
ii) iii) iv) there is no other earn
Page 13 and 14:
A member of SC/ST community is incl
Page 15 and 16:
Complementing Scheme is applicable,
Page 17 and 18:
4.12.1.7. Probation: Probation for
Page 19 and 20:
annexed hereafter. (i) L.D.C. Group
Page 21 and 22:
Merit and Normal Assessment scheme
Page 23 and 24:
Group -II Group & Grades Scale of p
Page 25 and 26:
to the one in which they were place
Page 27 and 28:
(b) (c) the appointments for all th
Page 29 and 30:
iv below will be admissible in subs
Page 31 and 32:
) get separate Work Reports; c) do
Page 33 and 34:
(viii) (ix) (x) (xi) In all service
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter VI Guidelines for consultan
Page 37 and 38:
Project Charges = Total expenses +
Page 39 and 40:
6.16.(A)&(B) Sponsored Research& co
Page 41 and 42:
upon by the Institute. There should
Page 43 and 44:
6.2.5 Indemnity / Liability The lia
Page 45 and 46:
licensed. The method and terms and
Page 47 and 48:
6.3.4.(D)(b) Licensing through the
Page 49 and 50:
production. Thus, a balance has to
Page 51 and 52:
6.3.9(C) Authorised signatories to
Page 53 and 54:
6.4.7 Indemnity/Liability The liabi
Page 55 and 56:
The monies accruing from commercial
Page 57 and 58:
6.7 Procedure for Sharing of Monies
Page 59 and 60:
epresentations shall be put up to t
Page 61 and 62:
1. Project Annexure -6.I PROFORMA F
Page 63 and 64:
10. Remarks Project Leader (Signatu
Page 65 and 66:
Annexure -6.III RESEARCH UTILISATIO
Page 67 and 68:
II c. Intellectual Property Product
Page 69 and 70:
V. Technical Services V.a. Training
Page 71 and 72:
The scientists/staff included have
Page 73 and 74:
9. Remarks Project Leader (Signatur
Page 75 and 76:
• Intellectual property is create
Page 77 and 78:
Annexure-6.VI PROFORMA FOR SEEKING
Page 79 and 80:
foreign aircraft over Indian territ
Page 81 and 82:
on it and the extent of facilities
Page 83 and 84:
Sl. No. Designation and scale of pa
Page 85 and 86:
Appendix Ib QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIE
Page 87 and 88: Group & Grade GROUP-IV(1) Rs.5500-9
Page 89 and 90: LIST OF RECOGNISED EQUIVALENT QUALI
Page 91 and 92: Sl.No Qualifications Equivalent to
Page 93 and 94: Appendix Id GUIDELINES FOR INDUCTIO
Page 95 and 96: Part 2. PROFESSIONAL INDEX Part 2A:
Page 97 and 98: Part 2C: Advisory and Institutional
Page 99 and 100: Part 3B: Training, Demonstration, D
Page 101 and 102: Part 3D: Pen picture by Reporting O
Page 103 and 104: positive statement. Please comment
Page 105 and 106: Part 6. Scientist’s Targets for C
Page 107 and 108: 2. Please state any other planned a
Page 109 and 110: PART II PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Part
Page 111 and 112: G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan En
Page 115 and 116: possession of any information which
Page 117 and 118: TASK COMPLETED DURING THE PERIOD CO
Page 119 and 120: 9. Membership of Professional Socie
Page 121 and 122: f) Engineering Services g) Informat
Page 123 and 124: f) Any other (give details) 6.3 Out
Page 125 and 126: II (B) APPRAISAL BY THE REPORTING A
Page 131 and 132: integrity, as the case may be. This
Page 133 and 134: TASK COMPLETED DURING THE PERIOD CO
Page 135 and 136: 2.4 The period of absence from duty
Page 137: overall qualities of the officer re
Page 141 and 142: Part II to the Reporting Authority,
Page 143 and 144: Speaker/ Instructor Feedback 1 Name
Page 145 and 146: SCHEDULE Ia Schedule specifying met
Page 147 and 148: 13 If a DPC exists what is its comp
Page 149 and 150: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 w.p.m. Hindi Trna
Page 151 and 152: DELEGATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS
Page 153 and 154: 13. Power to sanction Casual Leave
Page 155 and 156: journeys (S.R. 63). 27. Power to gr
Page 157 and 158: 37. Power to grant maternity leave
Page 159 and 160: DELEGATION OF FINANCIAL POWERS SCHE
Page 161 and 162: 12. Purchase of Liveries Badges for
Page 163 and 164: thereof. 26. Grant of Advances for
show all

rules and regulations of gbpihed - Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?