Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Streamlined Closing Agreement For Tax-Exempt Bonds: A Cure For Common ViolationsIn light of this relatively short predicted processing period, the policy and legal concernsdescribed above, and the belief that issuers and conduit borrowers would prefer writtenconfirmation from the IRS, the ACT decided not to propose a self-executing feature.The ACT now believes that the program described above can be operated in an efficientand timely manner and will ensure that an SCAP agreement, like the existing VCAP, willhave the statutorily-based finality of a closing agreement covered by Section 7121 ofthe Code.An IRS determination to decline an SCAP proposal would not preclude the applicantfrom refiling under SCAP with a revised Compliance Certificate. The IRS should statein its notice of rejection any specific deficiencies which prevented approval, in order tofacilitate a successful refiling. A short form, perhaps with boxes to be checked, could beused for this purpose.A notice declining to accept an SCAP proposal also should specifically state that theapplicant is encouraged to submit a proposal under the traditional VCAP program.Finally, a notice declining to accept an SCAP proposal should state that a refiling underSCAP or under the traditional VCAP program within a specified time period will relateback to the original filing date for purposes of avoiding the harsher treatment applicableto violations identified by audit.Fees/PenaltiesWhile a list of potential Covered Violations is appended to this report, the ACT has notattempted to propose specific terms or closing agreement amounts. The ACT suggeststhat such terms and amounts be established with the goal of encouraging the maximumpossible voluntary correction of unintended tax law violations. “Taxpayer exposure,”defined in IRM 4.81.1.23 as “…the amount of tax the Service could collect ifbondholders paid tax on the interest they have earned and will earn on the bonds,”which is a measure used in settling certain audit disputes, should not be the startingpoint for or a standard of comparison applied for this purpose. Amounts to be paidmight be better thought of as fees rather than as penalties. The ACT believes that,notwithstanding SCAP’s streamlining of the closing agreement process and theavailability of more moderate payments, issuers and conduit borrowers will still haveoverwhelming incentives to achieve full compliance at the outset. The time investmentnecessary even for application for SCAP relief, together with the awkwardness ofadmitting to a violation of the law, in almost all cases will prevent SCAP from being adisincentive to original compliance.ImplementationThe ACT recognizes that introduction of a new program requires a determination as tothe appropriate procedural vehicle for its establishment. The choice to utilize a formalRegulation, a Revenue Procedure, a Notice, an amendment to the Internal RevenueADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (ACT) June 11, 2008 8
The Streamlined Closing Agreement For Tax-Exempt Bonds: A Cure For Common ViolationsManual, or some combination of the above, must be made in the context of adetermination as to authorized powers which is beyond the scope of thisrecommendation. Whatever procedural choice is made, a new program of this sortshould be undertaken by TEB with the full support of Treasury, and of the FinancialInstitutions and Products and the Procedure and Administration divisions of the Office ofChief Counsel. The ACT believes that the bond community will be indifferent to thevehicle used to implement the program. Factors to be taken into account should includenot only ease of initial implementation but also whether the procedure can be modifiedeasily over time in light of program experience. In particular, additions (and deletions)to the list of Covered Violations should be able to be made on a regular basis as theIRS gains experience and confidence as to the program.ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (ACT) June 11, 2008 9
Page 5:
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AN
Page 9 and 10:
MEMBER BIOGRAPHIESGOVERNMENT ENTITI
Page 11 and 12:
GENERAL REPORTOF THEADVISORY COMMIT
Page 13:
General Report of the Advis
Page 18:
Improving the Employee Plans Compli
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
EXHIBIT DSubmission Type:(insert fr
Page 73 and 74:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)18. Descriptio
Page 75 and 76:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)VCP CHECKLISTT
Page 77 and 78:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)23. Have you i
Page 79 and 80:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)Instructions f
Page 81 and 82:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)23. Under Exam
Page 83 and 84:
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ONTAX EXEMPT AND
Page 85:
The Appropriate Role Of The Interna
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161: The Appropriate Role Of The Interna
Page 201: The Streamlined Closing Agreement F
Page 204 and 205: The Streamlined Closing Agreement F
Page 217: ADVISORY COMMITTEE ONTAX EXEMPT AND
Page 220 and 221: PROTECTING PLAN BENEFITS:IMPROVING
Page 261 and 262:
PROTECTING PLAN BENEFITS:IMPROVING
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267:
Page 271 and 272:
Tax Treatment Of Cellular Telephone
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
IRC, 2007-CODE-VOL, SEC. 280F. LIMI
Page 281 and 282:
PENIRC S 274 Page 1 of 12IIRC, 2007
Page 283 and 284:
PENIRC S 274 Page 3 of 12relationsh
Page 285:
Employee Cell Phones Page 1 of 1Emp
Page 289 and 290:
15. Special Rules for Various Types
Page 292:
Withholding RequirementsACCOUNTING
Page 299:
Page 303 and 304:
Governmental Relationship and Commu
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
show all

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?