10.07.2015 Views

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Tax</strong> Treatment Of Cellular Teleph<strong>on</strong>es And Internet-Provider AllowancesIII.SCOPE OF THE PROBLEMPers<strong>on</strong>al use <strong>and</strong> the taxati<strong>on</strong> of cell ph<strong>on</strong>es is specifically referred to in IRS CodeSecti<strong>on</strong> 280F(d)(4)(A)(v), (see Appendix for IRS Code Secti<strong>on</strong>s). That reference to IRCSecti<strong>on</strong> 280F is cited specifically in IRS Code Secti<strong>on</strong> 274(d)(4), which is part of IRSCode Secti<strong>on</strong> 274(d) Substantiati<strong>on</strong> Required.Sec 274(d) indicates no credit shall be allowed:unless the taxpayer substantiates by adequate records or by sufficient evidencecorroborating the taxpayer's own statement (A) the amount of such expense orother item, (B) the time <strong>and</strong> place of the travel, entertainment, amusement,recreati<strong>on</strong>, or use of the facility or property, or the date <strong>and</strong> descripti<strong>on</strong> of the gift,(C) the business purpose of the expense or other item, <strong>and</strong> (D) the businessrelati<strong>on</strong>ship to the taxpayer of pers<strong>on</strong>s entertained, using the facility or property,or receiving the gift. The Secretary may by regulati<strong>on</strong>s provide that some or all ofthe requirements of the preceding sentence shall not apply in the case of anexpense which does not exceed an amount prescribed pursuant to suchregulati<strong>on</strong>s. This subsecti<strong>on</strong> shall not apply to any qualified n<strong>on</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al usevehicle (as defined in subsecti<strong>on</strong> (i)).IRC Secti<strong>on</strong> 274(d) is generally referred to as the “Accountable Plan Rule”. Therequirements for documentati<strong>on</strong> to apply are not c<strong>on</strong>ducive to cell ph<strong>on</strong>e usage byindividuals employed <strong>and</strong> in possessi<strong>on</strong> of an employer provided cell ph<strong>on</strong>e. In fact, weassert these rules are administratively burdensome for any employer, regardless of thenumber of employees. To comply with this IRS Code Secti<strong>on</strong>, employers need toreview each <strong>and</strong> every line item <strong>on</strong> each <strong>and</strong> every cell ph<strong>on</strong>e bill received <strong>and</strong>distinguish those calls that are pers<strong>on</strong>al in nature from those calls that are businessrelated. The employer would then be required to seek reimbursement for the pers<strong>on</strong>alph<strong>on</strong>e calls from the employee.This treatment of identifying pers<strong>on</strong>al ph<strong>on</strong>e calls differs radically from an employeewho is employed at his employers’ place of business <strong>and</strong> has a l<strong>and</strong> line teleph<strong>on</strong>e <strong>on</strong>their desk. In this scenario, the employee is permitted to make infrequent use of theteleph<strong>on</strong>e for pers<strong>on</strong>al reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> no reimbursement is required of this desk boundemployee as the IRS Code identifies certain fringe benefits as not subject to taxati<strong>on</strong>(See IRS Code Secti<strong>on</strong> 132(e)). This treatment is disparate to employees who areperforming the same acti<strong>on</strong>s but who happen to have received a cell ph<strong>on</strong>e from theiremployer. We believe there is a presumpti<strong>on</strong> of primary business use when a cellph<strong>on</strong>e is provided to an employee.Since 1989, cellular ph<strong>on</strong>es <strong>and</strong> telecommunicati<strong>on</strong>s equipment (including PDA’s <strong>and</strong>Blackberrys) have been included in the definiti<strong>on</strong> of “listed property” under Secti<strong>on</strong> 280Fof the Code (See Appendix), which limits the amount of depreciati<strong>on</strong> for certain propertyADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (<strong>ACT</strong>) June 11, 2008 Page 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!