10.07.2015 Views

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tax</strong> Treatment Of Cellular Teleph<strong>on</strong>es And Internet-Provider AllowancesIV.RECOMMENDATIONSThe IRS has the authority to issue guidance to interpret the Code. Guidance is neededby all taxpayers for the dilemma of pers<strong>on</strong>al usage of employer provided cell ph<strong>on</strong>es. Itis clear that when the ‘listed property’ provisi<strong>on</strong> of the Code specifically included ‘cellph<strong>on</strong>es’ there was no method to determine the extent of the popularity of the cell ph<strong>on</strong>e<strong>and</strong> its use for business purposes. There is a presumpti<strong>on</strong> of business use when anemployer provides an employee with a cell ph<strong>on</strong>e. This presumpti<strong>on</strong> is undeniable in itsnature – there is a business purpose. To require an over burdensome process ofattempting to identify each <strong>and</strong> every incoming <strong>and</strong> outgoing ph<strong>on</strong>e call to meet theaccountable plan rules is not current with the business envir<strong>on</strong>ment as it exists today.We suggest the IRS issue interpretative guidance that would permit an employer toperform statistically valid sampling <strong>and</strong> this sampling method be described by the IRS inits guidance. Further, this prescribed method of sampling would suffice an examinati<strong>on</strong>by the IRS. Lastly, these samplings need <strong>on</strong>ly be performed <strong>on</strong>ce over a time periodsuch as every 2 – 4 years <strong>and</strong> retain its validity for examinati<strong>on</strong> purposes. Thissampling is the same effort the IRS performs during an exam <strong>on</strong> this issue <strong>and</strong> a benefitwould be a shorter cycle time for the completi<strong>on</strong> of an exam by the IRS if the samplingmethod was described adequately in the guidance.We also suggest that external groups such as the <strong>Government</strong> Finance OfficersAssociati<strong>on</strong> (GFOA), the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> of State Comptrollers <strong>and</strong> Treasurers(NAS<strong>ACT</strong>), <strong>and</strong> various other trade <strong>and</strong> industry groups pursue an effective lobbyingeffort to change the legislati<strong>on</strong> to reflect current business operating c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s torecognize the extent of cell ph<strong>on</strong>e usage by businesses. That is, we are recommendingthat cell ph<strong>on</strong>es be removed from ‘listed property’ as defined in the Code. This willprovide a comm<strong>on</strong>ality of tax treatment am<strong>on</strong>g all taxpayers that are now being treateddifferently depending <strong>on</strong> their work locati<strong>on</strong> or if they are issued a cell ph<strong>on</strong>e.It is also worth noting that <strong>on</strong> February 7, 2008, Treasury Secretary Henry Pauls<strong>on</strong>indicated that “… he was interested in a c<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al proposal designed to modernizethe Internal Revenue Code to recognize the growth of business-use mobilecommunicati<strong>on</strong>s devices”. This issue has been noticed by House Ways <strong>and</strong> Means<str<strong>on</strong>g>Committee</str<strong>on</strong>g> member Sam Johns<strong>on</strong> (R-Texas) <strong>and</strong> was the topic of his discussi<strong>on</strong> at aHouse Ways <strong>and</strong> Means hearing <strong>on</strong> President Bush’s fiscal year 2009 budget proposal.In this regard, Representative Johns<strong>on</strong> (R-Texas) introduced H.R. 5450 to amend theInternal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove cell ph<strong>on</strong>es from listed property under IRCSecti<strong>on</strong> 280F. The FSLG Subcommittee commends this acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> would support itsextensi<strong>on</strong> to include the removal of computer or peripheral equipment (as defined inSecti<strong>on</strong> 168(i)(2)(B)), which appears as “listed property” at IRC Secti<strong>on</strong> 280(d)(4)(A)(iv).ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (<strong>ACT</strong>) June 11, 2008 Page 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!