10.07.2015 Views

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Tax</strong> Treatment Of Cellular Teleph<strong>on</strong>es And Internet-Provider AllowancesII.INTRODUCTIONThe inventi<strong>on</strong> of cellular teleph<strong>on</strong>es (or cell ph<strong>on</strong>es) <strong>and</strong> the development of aworldwide web called the “internet” have dramatically changed the way many peoplearound the world, in particular the United States, live, work, <strong>and</strong> play, everyday of theirlives. The cell ph<strong>on</strong>e emerged around the same time as the Internet went public. 1Cell ph<strong>on</strong>es were first made available to the public in 1984. Back then, they were verylarge, expensive instruments. 2 It has been estimated that there were more than 219milli<strong>on</strong> cell ph<strong>on</strong>es in use in the United States as of 2005, <strong>and</strong> over 2 billi<strong>on</strong> worldwide. 3The first cell ph<strong>on</strong>e caused a fundamental technology <strong>and</strong> market shift toward thepers<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> away from the place. Motorola introduced the 16-ounce “Dyna TAC” ph<strong>on</strong>einto commercial service in 1983, with each ph<strong>on</strong>e costing the c<strong>on</strong>sumer $3,500. It tookseven additi<strong>on</strong>al years before there were a milli<strong>on</strong> subscribers in the United States.Today, there are more cellular subscribers than wireline ph<strong>on</strong>e subscribers in theworld, with mobile ph<strong>on</strong>es weighing as little as 3 ounces 4 (emphasis added).In 1989, the Internal Revenue Service designated cell ph<strong>on</strong>es as “listed property”. Thedesignati<strong>on</strong> recognizes that employers give mobile communicati<strong>on</strong> devices toemployees for business purposes, but because of their very nature, they also could beused for pers<strong>on</strong>al use.As a result, to exclude the use by an employee from taxable income, employers mustbe able to track <strong>and</strong> substantiate their employees’ usage of mobile communicati<strong>on</strong>sdevices. Technically, the law excludes any pers<strong>on</strong>al calls or e-mails, in the case ofBlackberries, as a deductible expense. 5With the proliferati<strong>on</strong> of cell ph<strong>on</strong>es <strong>and</strong> internet usage in the workplace, the issue oftax-related parity with other comm<strong>on</strong> “business-purpose” tools such as the officedesktop teleph<strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> access to the internet via the office computer has surfaced <strong>and</strong>needs to be addressed in the Internal Revenue Code.1Website www.historicaltextarchive.com2Website www.library.thinkquest.org3Website www.infoplease.com4Website www.thehistoryof.net5Bureau of Nati<strong>on</strong>al Affairs (BNA), Daily <strong>Tax</strong> Report, 26-DTR G-6, February 8, 2008ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (<strong>ACT</strong>) June 11, 2008 Page 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!