Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PROTECTING PLAN BENEFITS:IMPROVING GOVERNMENTAL DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN COMPLIANCESummary of ACT Survey Responses from BenefitsLinkThe respondents indicated that the most frequent qualification failures included:• Document modified incorrectly. Money Purchase features inserted in a Profit-Sharing Plan• Plan Document: When we are contacted by a prospect, the first thing we usuallyfind is that they have failed to timely update the plan document for all of therequired changes ("no one knows who is supposed to have been doing that")• Eligibility failures• The documents have not been updated for any laws. It is pages paper clippedthat don't make any sense whatsoever, or they have no document at all andeverything is done because the person who was there before them told them thatis how it was done• Operational failures. Misinterpretation of plan relating to eligibility - such asexcluding employees because human resources designates them as "notbenefits eligible" without any real criteria. but this is not particular togovernmental plans• If one assumes that a breach of a plan's trust terms tax-disqualifies the plan, themost frequent failure is investments precluded by the trust instrument or Statelaw• When we takeover a plan, we find that many have adopted a pre-approvedprototype document and are not following all of the terms of the document• Plan includes provisions not applicable to governmental plans, but these areoperationally ignored• NO Trust• Failure to properly maintain the document. With the current rapid pace ofstatutory and regulatory changes, it is becoming impossible to keep up with planamendments and notices to participants• Failure to make contributions on a "regular" basis. Plans are established andcontributions are often made only one time for a selected group, or one time for agroup that changes each year (retirees, terminated employees, employees thatreach specific age and service formula) with no additional contributions foremployees in that groupADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (ACT) June 11, 2008 32
PROTECTING PLAN BENEFITS:IMPROVING GOVERNMENTAL DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN COMPLIANCE• Failure to clearly define eligible employees is common. Non-concurrence withemployer policy and procedures based upon a poor understanding of thedocument by administrative employer staff is a result of this problemThe second most frequent qualification failures include:• Not covering all eligible employees• Operational: We have seen provisions in the plan that define specific actuarialequivalence definitions for determining alternate forms of benefits payable atretirement, but, amazingly, the actuary performing the calculations was using adifferent set of assumptions, both mortality and interest rates for these numbers,"based on a conversation we had with the client about 10 years ago"• Coverage discrimination• The governmental entity does not follow the provisions of the Plan. They justmake it up as they go along. They let people in early, change the forms ofdistributions, and allow in-service distributions when they are not allowed• I've had a couple adopt plans that they weren't eligible to adopt - a 401(k) planand a 403(b) plan. The advisors did this• Pre-effective date service is credited under DB plan and employer failed torecognize 415(b) limits• No 415 Language• Failure to operate the plan document according to the plan language. Becausethe IRS has been making rapid changes to plan documents, mistakes are madewhen interpreting plan language because the language changes so frequently.Just checking the language in the plan document leads to error because itmisses the changes made by the amendments• Failure to maintain documents. "Specimen" documents are provided togovernmental employers by product providers or consultants, but are notmaintained or updated. Since approved "prototype" documents are not veryhelpful for this group of employers, most documents do not get updated oramended after the initial adoption• We are aware that many governmental employers have relied upon "Specimen"documents supplied by investment product providers without proper legal adviceor plan design. A prototype plan would provide a simple and effective solution tothis problemThe third most frequent qualification failures include:ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (ACT) June 11, 2008 33
Page 5:
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT AN
Page 9 and 10:
MEMBER BIOGRAPHIESGOVERNMENT ENTITI
Page 11 and 12:
GENERAL REPORTOF THEADVISORY COMMIT
Page 13:
General Report of the Advis
Page 18:
Improving the Employee Plans Compli
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
EXHIBIT DSubmission Type:(insert fr
Page 73 and 74:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)18. Descriptio
Page 75 and 76:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)VCP CHECKLISTT
Page 77 and 78:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)23. Have you i
Page 79 and 80:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)Instructions f
Page 81 and 82:
EXHIBIT D (CONTINUED)23. Under Exam
Page 83 and 84:
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ONTAX EXEMPT AND
Page 85:
The Appropriate Role Of The Interna
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 201: The Streamlined Closing Agreement F
Page 204 and 205: The Streamlined Closing Agreement F
Page 217: ADVISORY COMMITTEE ONTAX EXEMPT AND
Page 220 and 221: PROTECTING PLAN BENEFITS:IMPROVING
Page 271 and 272: Tax Treatment Of Cellular Telephone
Page 279 and 280: IRC, 2007-CODE-VOL, SEC. 280F. LIMI
Page 281 and 282: PENIRC S 274 Page 1 of 12IIRC, 2007
Page 283 and 284: PENIRC S 274 Page 3 of 12relationsh
Page 285: Employee Cell Phones Page 1 of 1Emp
Page 289 and 290: 15. Special Rules for Various Types
Page 292: Withholding RequirementsACCOUNTING
Page 303 and 304:
Governmental Relationship and Commu
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
show all

Advisory Committee on Tax Exempt and Government Entities (ACT ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?