11.07.2015 Views

PDF copy of 2009 book

PDF copy of 2009 book

PDF copy of 2009 book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

268TABLE 10.16. The Frequency <strong>of</strong> Dominant LethalMutations (DLM) and Recessive Sex-Linked LethalMutations (RLM) in Natural Drosophila (Drosophilamelanogaster) Populations from the Vetka Districtin Gomel Province as Compared with the Populationfrom the Less Contaminated Berezinsk Reserve,Belarus (Glushkova et al., 1999)VetkaDistrictBerezinskyReserveDLM 42.76 ± 0.88 63.09 ± 0.91 ∗RLM 6.65 ± 0.66 12.64 ± 1.15 ∗∗∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.001.25. The frequency <strong>of</strong> lethal and semilethalmutations in drosophila (Drosophila melanogaster)populations is significantly higher in the Belarussiancontaminated territories (Makeevaet al., 1995).26. In natural drosophila (Drosophilamelanogaster) populations from the Vetka District,Gomel Province (radiation level <strong>of</strong> 24Ci/km 2 ), the incidence <strong>of</strong> dominant lethaland recessive sex-linked lethal mutations issignificantly lower than in the less contami-nated Berezinsky Reserve, as a result <strong>of</strong> increasedradioresistance in the irradiated population(Table 10.16).27. The highest level <strong>of</strong> mutations wasobserved in aquatic crustaceans Amphipodaand Platyhelminth worm populations in theChernobyl 10-km zone as compared with populationsfrom the Black and Aegean seas andthe Danube and Dnieper rivers (Tsytsugynaand Polycarpov, 2007).28. Table 10.17 presents some additionaldata on genetic changes in animals associatedwith the Chernobyl contamination.10.4. Changes in Other BiologicalCharacteristics1. Voles (Clethrionomys sp. and Microtus sp.)from the contaminated areas showed impairedbrain development and deformed limbs(Sokolov and Kryvolutsky, 1998).2. Neutrophilic phagocytic activity to Staphylococcusaureus in the blood serum and the B-lymphocytic system was significantly lower inTABLE 10.17. Examples <strong>of</strong> Genetic Changes in Animals as a Consequence <strong>of</strong> the Chernobyl Catastrophe(Based on Møller and Mousseau, 2006)Species Genetic marker Effect, comments ReferenceApodemus flavicollis Chromosome aberrations Increase by a factor <strong>of</strong> 3–7 Savchenko, 1995Mus musculus Reciprocal translocations Increase by a factor <strong>of</strong> 15 Pomerantseva et al., 1990,1996Clethryonomys glareolus Somatic mutation Increased ∗ Matson, 2000Multiple substitutions inCytochrome-b andtransversionsOnly from ChernobylsamplesBaker et al., 1999Mutation and heteroplasmy ∗∗ Increased ∗ Wickliffe et al., 2002Point mutations Increased ∗ Dubrova, 2003; Wickliffeet al., 2002Hirundo rustica Microsatellites Increased by a factor <strong>of</strong> 2–10 Ellegren et al., 1997Icterus punctatus DNA breakage I Increased rate Snugg, 1996Carassius carassius DNA content Changes Lingerfelser, 1997Four fish species Frequency <strong>of</strong> aneuploidy Increased Dallas, 1998Drosophila melanogaster Sex-linked lethal mutations Increased Zainullin, 1992Three OligochaetespeciesChromosomal aberrations Increased by a factor <strong>of</strong> ∼2 Tsytsugyna and Polycarpov,2003∗ Not statistically significant.∗∗ Heteroplasmy—mixed mitochondria in a single cell.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!