11.07.2015 Views

PDF copy of 2009 book

PDF copy of 2009 book

PDF copy of 2009 book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHERNOBYL11. Chernobyl’s Radioactive Impacton Microbial BiotaAlexey V. YablokovOf the few microorganisms that have been studied, all underwent rapid changes inthe areas heavily contaminated by Chernobyl. Organisms such as tuberculosis bacilli;hepatitis, herpes, and tobacco mosaic viruses; cytomegalovirus; and soil micromycetesand bacteria were activated in various ways. The ultimate long-term consequences forthe Chernobyl microbiologic biota may be worse than what we know today. Comparedto humans and other mammals, the pr<strong>of</strong>ound changes that take place among thesesmall live organisms with rapid reproductive turnover do not bode well for the healthand survival <strong>of</strong> other species.One gram <strong>of</strong> soil contains some 2,500,000,000microorganisms (bacteria, micr<strong>of</strong>ungi, and protozoa).Up to 3 kg <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong> an adult humanbody is made up <strong>of</strong> bacteria, viruses, and micr<strong>of</strong>ungi.In spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that these representsuch important and fundamentally live ecosystemsthere are only scarce data on the variousmicrobiological consequences <strong>of</strong> the Chernobylcatastrophe.Several incidences <strong>of</strong> increased morbidityowing to certain infectious diseases may be dueto increased virulence <strong>of</strong> microbial populationsas a result <strong>of</strong> Chernobyl irradiation.1. Soon after the catastrophe studies observedactivation <strong>of</strong> retroviruses (Kavsanet al., 1992).2. There is evidence <strong>of</strong> increased susceptibilityto Pneumocystis carinii and cytomegalovirusin children whose immunesystems were suppressed in the contaminatedterritories <strong>of</strong> Novozybkov District,Bryansk Province (Lysenko et al., 1996).3. Tuberculosis became more virulent inthe more contaminated areas <strong>of</strong> Belarus(Chernetsky and Osynovsky, 1993; Belookaya,1993; Borschevsky et al., 1996).Address for correspondence: Alexey V. Yablokov, RussianAcademy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, Office 319, 119071Moscow, Russia. Voice: +7-495-952-80-19; fax: +7-495-952-80-19.Yablokov@ecopolicy.ru4. In some heavily contaminated areas <strong>of</strong> Belarusand Russia there was a markedlyhigher level <strong>of</strong> cryptosporidium infestation(Lavdovskaya et al., 1996).5. From 1993 to 1997 the hepatitis virusesB, C, D, and G became noticeablyactivated in the heavily contaminatedareas <strong>of</strong> Belarus (Zhavoronok et al.,1998a,b).6. Herpes viruses were activated in the heavilycontaminated territories <strong>of</strong> Belarus 6to 7 years after the catastrophe (Matveev,1993; Matveev et al., 1995; Voropaev et al.,1996).7. Activation <strong>of</strong> cytomegalovirus was foundin the heavily contaminated districts <strong>of</strong>Gomel and Mogilev provinces, Belarus(Matveev, 1993).8. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Pneumocystis was noticeablyhigher in the heavily contaminated territories<strong>of</strong> Bryansk Province (Lavdovskayaet al., 1996).9. The prevalence and severity <strong>of</strong> Gruby’sdisease (ringworm), caused by the fungusmicrosporia Microsporum sp., was significantlyhigher in the heavily contaminatedareas <strong>of</strong> Bryansk Province (Rudnitsky et al.,2003).10. The number <strong>of</strong> saprophytic bacteria inBelarussian sod-podzolic soils is at maximuminareaswithradioactivitylevels<strong>of</strong>15 Ci/km 2 or less and minimal in areas281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!