11.07.2015 Views

PDF copy of 2009 book

PDF copy of 2009 book

PDF copy of 2009 book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHERNOBYL3. General Morbidity, Impairment, andDisability after the Chernobyl CatastropheAlexey V. YablokovIn all cases when comparing the territories heavily contaminated by Chernobyl’s radionuclideswith less contaminated areas that are characterized by a similar economy,demography, and environment, there is a marked increase in general morbidity in theformer. Increased numbers <strong>of</strong> sick and weak newborns were found in the heavily contaminatedterritories in Belarus, Ukraine, and European Russia.There is no threshold for ionizing radiation’simpact on health. The explosion <strong>of</strong> the fourthreactor <strong>of</strong> the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant(NPP) dispersed an enormous amount <strong>of</strong> radionuclides(see Chapter I for details). Even thesmallest excess <strong>of</strong> radiation over that <strong>of</strong> naturalbackground will statistically (stochastically) affectthe health <strong>of</strong> exposed individuals or theirdescendants, sooner or later. Changes in generalmorbidity were among the first stochasticeffects <strong>of</strong> the Chernobyl irradiation.In all cases when territories heavily contaminatedby Chernobyl radionuclides arecompared with less contaminated areas thatare similar in ethnography, economy, demography,and environment, there is increasedmorbidity in the more contaminated territories,increased numbers <strong>of</strong> weak newborns,and increased impairment and disability. Thedata on morbidity included in this chapterare only a few examples from many similarstudies.3.1. Belarus1. The general morbidity <strong>of</strong> children noticeablyincreased in the heavily contaminated territories.This includes deaths from commonAddress for correspondence: Alexey V. Yablokov, RussianAcademy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Leninsky Prospect 33, Office 319, 119071Moscow, Russia. Voice: +7-495-952-80-19; fax: +7-495-952-80-19.Yablokov@ecopolicy.ruas well as rare illnesses (Nesterenko et al.,1993).2. According to data from the BelarussianMinistry <strong>of</strong> Public Health, just beforethe catastrophe (in 1985), 90% <strong>of</strong> childrenwere considered “practically healthy.” By 2000fewer than 20% were considered so, and inthe most contaminated Gomel Province, fewerthan 10% <strong>of</strong> children were well (Nesterenko,2004).3. From 1986 to 1994 the overall death ratefor newborns was 9.5%. The largest increase(up to 205%), found in the most contaminatedGomel Province (Dzykovich et al., 1996), wasdue primarily to disease among the growingnumber <strong>of</strong> premature infants.4. The number <strong>of</strong> children with impairedphysical development increased in the heavilycontaminated territories (Sharapov, 2001).5. Children from areas with contaminationlevels <strong>of</strong> 15–40 Ci/km 2 who were newbornto 4 years old at the time <strong>of</strong> the catastrophehave significantly more illnesses than thosefrom places with contamination levels <strong>of</strong> 5–15 Ci/km 2 (Kul’kova et al., 1996).6. In 1993, only 9.5% <strong>of</strong> children (0 to 4years old at the time <strong>of</strong> the catastrophe) werehealthy in areas within the Kormyansk andChechersk districts <strong>of</strong> Gomel Province, wheresoil Cs-137 levels were higher than 5 Ci/km 2 .Some 37% <strong>of</strong> the children there suffer fromchronic diseases. The annual increase in disease(per 1,000, for 16 classes <strong>of</strong> illnesses) in the42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!