panel <strong>of</strong> scientists could rapidly be assembled from its ranks to deal effectively with this new area<strong>of</strong> research. Given current conditions, however, it is probably best for these people to continue theirinvestigations in private. The history <strong>of</strong> the Condon investigation at the University <strong>of</strong> Coloradoconvinced many <strong>of</strong> us <strong>of</strong> this.What Condon Didn't KnowMy own impression <strong>of</strong> the Condon fiasco is not simply a coverup scenario. I believe that the AirForce late in 1966 was utterly fed up and wanted to get out <strong>of</strong> the business. After over twenty years<strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> this problem, the military was in essence saying to academia, with good reason, "Wehave found no evidence that it lies within our mission. The objects are not openly behaving asenemies <strong>of</strong> the United States. We do not even know what they are made <strong>of</strong>, and every time wesubmit a case to the scientists they ridicule our pilots, who are only guilty <strong>of</strong> trusting their own eyesand their own instruments. We have had enough <strong>of</strong> this. Here are the data. It is your turn to see whatyou can make <strong>of</strong> these phenomena."The scientific community, which had been so eager to make statements before the cameras toexplain UFOs as long as the Air Force was in charge, reacted coolly to the suggestion that their ownpet explanations should be seriously tested on a larger scale. Several universities, including Harvardand Columbia, were contacted by the Department <strong>of</strong> Defense, but they turned down the assignmentand the research money for it.The Europeans followed this development with keen interest and eagerly anticipated the Americandecision, for their <strong>of</strong>ficial policy would be modeled after the U.S. stand on the matter. There wasexplosive material in the European files. Many <strong>of</strong> the sightings were extremely well documented,and classified investigations <strong>of</strong> the highest caliber had been made much more thoroughly andpr<strong>of</strong>essionally than even the best cases in the U.S. Air Force files. And no wonder. Some <strong>of</strong> thewitnesses had been <strong>of</strong> the highest political rank. In one European country, a near landing had takenplace on the chief <strong>of</strong> state's private estate! The craft had been described in detail by members <strong>of</strong> the<strong>of</strong>ficial's entourage. This meant that the investigation had been conducted at the very top level. Thechauffeur <strong>of</strong> this high political authority, as described in a report <strong>of</strong> the sighting, while drivingthrough the estate,sees what he believes to be an aircraft trying to land on the road, directly in front <strong>of</strong> him. Hestops the car immediately. The object passes just a few meters above the stopped car and,while doing this, causes violent vertical vibrations in the vehicle. A few seconds later, theobject reverses its course and passes again, now in the opposite direction, with the sameeffects on the car. Then, having regained its position above some trees where it had initiallyappeared, it makes a fast change <strong>of</strong> altitude, a ninety-degree tilting with respect to thehorizontal, and darts away to the west.The witness is highly reliable [the report goes on]. We found that the object, an upside-downplate with a central turret and portholes, could be <strong>of</strong> the dimensions reported by the witness,namely twenty meters.Such an observation was no joke. Yet neither the U.S. Air Force nor the American academiccommunity was aware <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> the problem in Western Europe. The Soviets were possiblyeven more interested than the West Europeans.The rumor that spread in Europe through "informal channels" during the summer <strong>of</strong> 1966 wasdifficult to verify, but in view <strong>of</strong> later events in the history <strong>of</strong> the Condon committee it has someinterest. According to that rumor, the Air Force was completely frustrated with the UFO problemand was looking for an excuse to get rid <strong>of</strong> it. The only problem was to find a university willing towrite a negative report after a cursory examination <strong>of</strong> the facts. This, I repeat, was only a rumor. Butthis rumor was taken seriously enough in Paris to prevent the creation <strong>of</strong> an investigation committee
similar to the American one. The Russians made some moves toward the creation <strong>of</strong> a committeebut cleverly awaited the developments in the United States before funding it and giving it an <strong>of</strong>ficialstamp <strong>of</strong> approval. In Boulder, Colorado, a group was finally being assembled with much fanfare,headed by Dr. Condon, a prestigious physicist close to retirement. The group had recieved asizeable grant to ponder ufology, and its report was due in 1969. It would prove to be negative.Destroying the DataIn November 1966, when the Condon committee started gathering testimony from people who haddone research into UFO cases, Dr. Hynek and I were the first scientists asked to come to Boulder tobrief the group. We soon noticed that one <strong>of</strong> the administrators, Bob Low, was clearly the keydecision maker on the team, although he had no science degree and seemed to have little interest inthe matter. Yet there was a certain euphoric feeling in the room, a sense <strong>of</strong> embarking on a uniqueadventure. There was little passion in the press now; the Michigan swamp gas crisis had beenlargely forgotten. The problem was in the hands <strong>of</strong> the scientists, and it had become as dull as anyventure that is in the process <strong>of</strong> being rationalized away by the academic mill. If the journey to themoon can be turned into the exasperating bore that modern technology has generated, there is noreason to expect that the same lack <strong>of</strong> interest will not settle over the UFO mystery once it falls intothe hands <strong>of</strong> Big Science! (The first astronauts to die in orbit will probably die <strong>of</strong> ennui when theyrun out <strong>of</strong> buttons to push, digits to read out, and jokes with Houston about the football scores.)As early as February 1967, members <strong>of</strong> the Condon committee were privately approaching theirscientific colleagues on other campuses, asking them how they would react if the committee's finalreport to the Air Force were to recommend closing down Project Blue Book. Not surprisingly, a fewmonths later the work <strong>of</strong> the committee had come to a standstill. Field investigations werenonexistent. Questionnaires were sent out to witnesses, but only one assistant was aviable to encodethe results for the computer file, where the bulk <strong>of</strong> the information was provided by the threethousand punched cards I had turned over to the committee.A minority faction <strong>of</strong> the group caused a crisis when it rebelled. After a series <strong>of</strong> incidents that Dr.Dave Saunders documented in his book, UFOs? Yes!, the team split into two factions. An earlyrestricted memorandum discovered and published by the minority group provided evidence that theCondon committee had never intended to look seriously into the UFO problem. Publication <strong>of</strong> thisdocument so outraged Condon that he fired the minority group and ran the project without anyfurther consideration <strong>of</strong> the possible reality <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon.The files <strong>of</strong> the committee were eventually destroyed. One would think that they belonged to thescientific fraternity or to the public domain, since American taxpayers paid for the "research." Notso. When the project wrote its report the files were locked up by the University <strong>of</strong> Colorado inBoulder. They were later transferred to a private home and were burned shortly thereafter.The Second Coverup: Convenient ExplanationsThe little town <strong>of</strong> Carteret lies on the western coast <strong>of</strong> Normandy, France, about twenty miles fromCherbourg. It is situated directly to the north <strong>of</strong> wonderful Mont-Saint-Michel, a monastery that, aslegend goes, was built by the devil. On December 2, 1973, a very strange thing happened on thebeach at Carteret. Two fishermen, Mr. G. Jean, forty-four, and his son Noel, eighteen, got up at 5:00A.M. to retrieve their nets at low tide. When they arrived on the beach half an hour later, they saw avery bright object directly over the area where their nets had been spread. They walked toward ituntil they estimated they were about 150 yards away, and it appeared as an intense yellow"window," eight feet long and five feet high, emitting a cone-like beam directed toward the ground.The two fishermen were afraid and decided not to go closer. They tried to work without thinkingabout the object, but then it changed suddenly: the yellow light was turned <strong>of</strong>f. Over the area where
- Page 3 and 4:
Foreword by Whitley StrieberThere a
- Page 5 and 6:
It is sad that, as the twentieth ce
- Page 7 and 8:
PART ONE: THE ALIEN CHRONICLESIn th
- Page 9 and 10:
lot about it, but nobody said 'Let'
- Page 11 and 12:
The resemblance of the Dogu statues
- Page 13:
various forms of error worship unde
- Page 16 and 17:
them. These apparitions are scarce,
- Page 18 and 19:
was again shot at. Another creature
- Page 20 and 21:
The story is fantastic. Yet it remi
- Page 22 and 23:
their virginity in the sanctuaries
- Page 24 and 25:
A letter from a British woman begin
- Page 26 and 27:
The recollections of the legionnair
- Page 28 and 29:
lades. In less time than it takes t
- Page 30 and 31:
e called Smith said: "No, we cannot
- Page 32 and 33:
Celtic legends, along with the docu
- Page 34 and 35:
probably took place in the second p
- Page 36 and 37:
Australian Air Force Intelligence p
- Page 38 and 39:
ings in the fields and prairies?One
- Page 40 and 41:
From behind the object, two beings
- Page 42 and 43:
"in smooth English." They did not s
- Page 44 and 45:
to four feet tall, dressed in white
- Page 46 and 47:
expectations as if they were mere t
- Page 48 and 49:
came out of it, but this person was
- Page 50 and 51:
6. When men did not inhabit most of
- Page 52 and 53:
the negative reactions of scientist
- Page 54 and 55:
other in appearance, dress, mode of
- Page 56 and 57:
saw that they had made a grin, he h
- Page 58 and 59:
and rode out after dark in search o
- Page 60 and 61:
sighting, and the Sonny Desvergers
- Page 62 and 63:
PART TWO: ANOTHER REALITYDuring the
- Page 64 and 65:
pencil in a buttonhole with a piece
- Page 66 and 67:
short perpendicular line on each en
- Page 68 and 69:
sudden displacement of warm air or
- Page 70 and 71:
popular today. But a second - and e
- Page 72 and 73: ecorded about 1825 in the Vale of N
- Page 74 and 75: The ikal of the Tzotzils flies thro
- Page 76 and 77: the door, he turned and recieved a
- Page 78 and 79: If Stewart came back today, he woul
- Page 80 and 81: The devil does not have a body. The
- Page 82 and 83: interested in the social implicatio
- Page 84 and 85: Very well, little son. Come back to
- Page 86 and 87: measure. But the phenomenon does ap
- Page 88 and 89: and physical, to determine whether
- Page 90 and 91: previous year. But the fact remains
- Page 92 and 93: Do Not Report This!Accounts such as
- Page 94 and 95: least one occasion, experienced lev
- Page 96 and 97: deep unconscious level of the symbo
- Page 98 and 99: much as twenty hours a day, and in
- Page 100 and 101: against me as I stood bracing mysel
- Page 102 and 103: another one, but this was very defi
- Page 104 and 105: not natural, was witnessed by perso
- Page 106 and 107: The predicted miracle took place as
- Page 108 and 109: The phenomenon, it seems, could not
- Page 110 and 111: in the final analysis.Many of us wi
- Page 112 and 113: already surrounded....I was told wh
- Page 114 and 115: Since the publication of my earlier
- Page 116 and 117: ”A bright flash”Fatima, May 13,
- Page 118 and 119: The Invisible CollegeAfter some thi
- Page 120 and 121: the Air Force met in Dallas and dis
- Page 124 and 125: it had been hovering there was now
- Page 126 and 127: like piezo-electricity, or static e
- Page 128 and 129: the group teachings and advice. The
- Page 130 and 131: This is a frightening view, one tha
- Page 132 and 133: John McCoy, who coauthored with Wil
- Page 134 and 135: of reports about "the robots" and "
- Page 136 and 137: eathe our air. They walked normally
- Page 138 and 139: the designation Wolf 424.The myster
- Page 140 and 141: a scar or a mark. The authorities w
- Page 142 and 143: esearches might have a bearing on a
- Page 144 and 145: me undeniable) and as psychic devic
- Page 146 and 147: extraterrestrial theory is not stra
- Page 148 and 149: the universe summarizes the problem
- Page 150 and 151: About the AuthorAn astrophysicist b