Australian Air Force Intelligence people were all over the place. Rumors circulated blaming theSoviets for using the vast open spaces <strong>of</strong> Australia to develop scientific ideas far ahead <strong>of</strong> theAmericans. Why the Soviets could not conduct their secret testing in the vast open spaces <strong>of</strong> Siberiawas not disclosed. Neither was it revealed why the pilots <strong>of</strong> the super-secret communist weaponcould not resist the temptation to buzz the tractor <strong>of</strong> a twenty-seven-year-old banana grower in thecapitalist world.Fortunately, there were several natural explanations for the sighting or the nests, although only onehypothesis, suggested by a Sydney Sun-Herald reader on January 30, accounted for both. Hebelieved the outerspace panic in Queensland was caused by a "tall shy bird with a blue body and redmarkings on the head." It was either a type <strong>of</strong> brolga or a blue heron, but the man did not know thecorrect scientific name. Many times, as he wandered barefooted though the bush, he said, he hadseen the birds dancing, but they flew away at high speed before he could reach them: "They wouldresemble a vaporous blue cloud and would certainly make a whirring sound in flight."Unfortunately for this pretty and imaginative theory, it got no backing from biologists. Museumornithologist H. J. Disney thought the brolgas could not make circular depressions <strong>of</strong> symmetricaldesign. He was similarly skeptical about the "bald-headed coot theory" advanced by another man,Gooloogong resident Ken Adams. "I've never heard <strong>of</strong> this habit by the bird," Disney said.Researcher Donald Hanlon has pointed out that another explanation for the nests has been proposedlocally: they are the "playground <strong>of</strong> crocodiles in love." I fully share Hanlon's skepticism about thislast explanation, because it could hardly apply to the nests found in Ohio, which will be discussedin a moment, or to the damaged wheat field in Montsoreau. A Queensland resident, AlexBordujenko, who knows about the crocodiles, claims the reeds are too thick in Horseshoe Lagoonfor crocodiles to move through them.So here we are: dancing cranes are held responsible by some people for bending reeds that are sothick crocodiles, according to other people, cannot move through them. What really caused thedamage? Nobody knows.On his way home that Wednesday night, George Pedley decided he would tell no one about the"spaceship" in the swamp. He saw neither portholes nor antennae on the blue-gray object and nosign <strong>of</strong> life either inside or about it. Furthermore, he had always laughed at flying saucer stories.But then he met Albert Pennisi, the owner <strong>of</strong> Horseshoe Lagoon, and disclosed the sighting. He wasvery surprised when Pennisi believed him right away and told him he had been dreaming for a weekthat a flying saucer would land on his property. This last detail places the Queensland saucer nestsin the best tradition <strong>of</strong> the fairy-faith.The time: six months before the Queensland experience. The place: Delroy, Ohio. On June 28,1965, a farmer, John Stavano, heard a series <strong>of</strong> explosions. Two days later, he discovered a curiousformation on the ground. When analyzed, soil and wheat samples showed no evidence <strong>of</strong> anexplosion. Wheat plants seemed to have been sucked out <strong>of</strong> the ground, like the uprooted reeds inQueensland or the uprooted grass in a French landing <strong>of</strong> 1954 in Poncey.The Ohio incident was carefully investigated by local civilian researchers. A. Candusso and LarryMoyers accompanied by Gary Davis. They found the strange circular formation on Stavano's farm,which is situated on a high point. At the center <strong>of</strong> the ring was a circular depression about twentyeightinches in diameter. It was probed with a pinch bar, but only loose soil was found for a depth <strong>of</strong>nine inches. Much <strong>of</strong> the wheat had been removed, roots and all, and clods <strong>of</strong> soil a few inches longhad been disturbed. The wheat was laid down like the spokes <strong>of</strong> a wheel; there was no swirlingeffects as in the Tully nests.If we turn from Australia and Ohio to England, we are faced with another incident. As reported inThe Flying Saucer Review by editor Waveney Girvan (September 1963):July 16, 1963, will long be remembered in the annals <strong>of</strong> British Ufology. Somethingappeared to have landed on farmer Roy Blanchard's field at the Manor Farm, Charlton,Wiltshire. The marks on the ground were first discovered by a farmworker, Reg Alexander.They overlapped a potato field and a barely field. The marks comprised a saucer-shaped
depression or crater eight feet in diameter and about four inches in depth. In the center <strong>of</strong>this depression there was found a three feet deep hole variously described as from fiveinches to one foot in diameter. Radiating from the central hole were four slot marks, fourfeet long and one foot wide. The object must have landed – if land it did – unseen, but Mr.Leonard Joliffe, a dairyman on the farm, reported he heard "a blast one morning atapproximately 6 A.M."On July 23, the London Daily Express was to report that nearly two weeks earlier, on July 10,Police Constable Anthony Penny hed seen an orange object flash through the sky and vanish nearthe Manor Farm field. On the basis <strong>of</strong> this limited information, it would seem quite plausible tothink that the Charlton crater was caused by a meteorite. Indeed, when a small piece <strong>of</strong> metal wasrecovered from the hole at the center <strong>of</strong> the crater, British astronomer Patrick Moore went to theBritish Broadcasting Corporation and stated categorically that the crater had been caused by a"shrimp-sized meteorite," crashing down and turning itself into a very effective explosive. Thisended the mystery as far as the scientific public was concerned. But the actual facts <strong>of</strong> the matter, asthey became known to a few scientists who pursued it, and to the Army engineers who were incharge <strong>of</strong> the investigation, were altogether different.Farmer Roy Blanchard sent for the police, who, in turn, summoned the Army. Captain JohnRodgers, chief <strong>of</strong> the Army bomb disposal unit, conducted most <strong>of</strong> the field investigations. Hispreliminary report indicated no burn or scratch marks, no trace <strong>of</strong> an explosion. And while CaptainRodgers stated that he and his superiors were baffled, farmer Roy Blanchard made furtherdisclosures:There isn't a trace <strong>of</strong> the potatoes and barley which were growing where the crater is now.No stalks, no roots, no leaves. The thing was heavy enough to crush rocks and stones topowder? Yet it came down gently. We heard no crash and whatever power it uses producesno heat or noise.Then, on July 19, it was reported that Captain Rodgers had obtained permission to sink a shaft. Thereadings obtained were rather unusual. They indicated a metallic object <strong>of</strong> some size, deeplyembedded. And it was further learned that "detectors behaved wildly," presumably because themetallic piece in question was highly magnetic.At this stage, it should be pointed out, the investigation was still open and aboveboard, possiblybecause the Army, rather than the British Air Ministry, was involved. And the Army SouthernCommand public relations <strong>of</strong>ficer at Salisbury told Girvan that the object was recovered from thehole. It was sent to a British Museum expert and promptly identified as a piece <strong>of</strong> commonironstone, "which could be found buried all over Southern England." The British Museumsuggested that it had been in the ground for some time, thus eliminating the idea <strong>of</strong> a hoax. And Dr.F. Claringbull, also <strong>of</strong> the Museum, destroyed the meteorite explanation and, according to theYorkshire Post <strong>of</strong> July 27, stated: "There is more in this than meets the eye." The last word stayedwith Southern Command, however, and it commented wisely: "The cause <strong>of</strong> the phenomena is stillunexplained but it is no part <strong>of</strong> the Army's task to unravel such mysteries."If we try to summarize what we have learned from these incidents – the Tully nest, the Ohio ring,and the Charlton crater – we can state the following: (1) public rumor associates sighting <strong>of</strong> flyingsaucers with the discovery <strong>of</strong> circular depressions on the ground; (2) when vegetation is present atthe site, it exhibits the action <strong>of</strong> a flattering force which produces either a stationary pattern("spokes <strong>of</strong> a wheel") or a rotating pattern (clockwise or counterclockwise); (3) some <strong>of</strong> thevegetation is usually removed, sometimes with the roots, leaves, etc.; (4) the effect <strong>of</strong> a very strongvertical force is <strong>of</strong>ten noticed, as evidenced by earth and plants scattered around the site; (5) strongmagnetic activity has been found in one instance, where common ironstone was buried close to thecenter <strong>of</strong> the depression; and (6) a deep hole, a few inches in diameter, is <strong>of</strong>ten present at the center.Do I need to remind the reader <strong>of</strong> that celebrated habit <strong>of</strong> the elves, to leave behind them strange
- Page 3 and 4: Foreword by Whitley StrieberThere a
- Page 5 and 6: It is sad that, as the twentieth ce
- Page 7 and 8: PART ONE: THE ALIEN CHRONICLESIn th
- Page 9 and 10: lot about it, but nobody said 'Let'
- Page 11 and 12: The resemblance of the Dogu statues
- Page 13: various forms of error worship unde
- Page 16 and 17: them. These apparitions are scarce,
- Page 18 and 19: was again shot at. Another creature
- Page 20 and 21: The story is fantastic. Yet it remi
- Page 22 and 23: their virginity in the sanctuaries
- Page 24 and 25: A letter from a British woman begin
- Page 26 and 27: The recollections of the legionnair
- Page 28 and 29: lades. In less time than it takes t
- Page 30 and 31: e called Smith said: "No, we cannot
- Page 32 and 33: Celtic legends, along with the docu
- Page 34 and 35: probably took place in the second p
- Page 38 and 39: ings in the fields and prairies?One
- Page 40 and 41: From behind the object, two beings
- Page 42 and 43: "in smooth English." They did not s
- Page 44 and 45: to four feet tall, dressed in white
- Page 46 and 47: expectations as if they were mere t
- Page 48 and 49: came out of it, but this person was
- Page 50 and 51: 6. When men did not inhabit most of
- Page 52 and 53: the negative reactions of scientist
- Page 54 and 55: other in appearance, dress, mode of
- Page 56 and 57: saw that they had made a grin, he h
- Page 58 and 59: and rode out after dark in search o
- Page 60 and 61: sighting, and the Sonny Desvergers
- Page 62 and 63: PART TWO: ANOTHER REALITYDuring the
- Page 64 and 65: pencil in a buttonhole with a piece
- Page 66 and 67: short perpendicular line on each en
- Page 68 and 69: sudden displacement of warm air or
- Page 70 and 71: popular today. But a second - and e
- Page 72 and 73: ecorded about 1825 in the Vale of N
- Page 74 and 75: The ikal of the Tzotzils flies thro
- Page 76 and 77: the door, he turned and recieved a
- Page 78 and 79: If Stewart came back today, he woul
- Page 80 and 81: The devil does not have a body. The
- Page 82 and 83: interested in the social implicatio
- Page 84 and 85: Very well, little son. Come back to
- Page 86 and 87:
measure. But the phenomenon does ap
- Page 88 and 89:
and physical, to determine whether
- Page 90 and 91:
previous year. But the fact remains
- Page 92 and 93:
Do Not Report This!Accounts such as
- Page 94 and 95:
least one occasion, experienced lev
- Page 96 and 97:
deep unconscious level of the symbo
- Page 98 and 99:
much as twenty hours a day, and in
- Page 100 and 101:
against me as I stood bracing mysel
- Page 102 and 103:
another one, but this was very defi
- Page 104 and 105:
not natural, was witnessed by perso
- Page 106 and 107:
The predicted miracle took place as
- Page 108 and 109:
The phenomenon, it seems, could not
- Page 110 and 111:
in the final analysis.Many of us wi
- Page 112 and 113:
already surrounded....I was told wh
- Page 114 and 115:
Since the publication of my earlier
- Page 116 and 117:
”A bright flash”Fatima, May 13,
- Page 118 and 119:
The Invisible CollegeAfter some thi
- Page 120 and 121:
the Air Force met in Dallas and dis
- Page 122 and 123:
panel of scientists could rapidly b
- Page 124 and 125:
it had been hovering there was now
- Page 126 and 127:
like piezo-electricity, or static e
- Page 128 and 129:
the group teachings and advice. The
- Page 130 and 131:
This is a frightening view, one tha
- Page 132 and 133:
John McCoy, who coauthored with Wil
- Page 134 and 135:
of reports about "the robots" and "
- Page 136 and 137:
eathe our air. They walked normally
- Page 138 and 139:
the designation Wolf 424.The myster
- Page 140 and 141:
a scar or a mark. The authorities w
- Page 142 and 143:
esearches might have a bearing on a
- Page 144 and 145:
me undeniable) and as psychic devic
- Page 146 and 147:
extraterrestrial theory is not stra
- Page 148 and 149:
the universe summarizes the problem
- Page 150 and 151:
About the AuthorAn astrophysicist b