Do Not Report This!Accounts such as the one I have just quoted abound in a corner <strong>of</strong> the psychic house that too fewpeople interested in paranormal phenomena ever take the trouble to visit. In the last twenty-fiveyears, at least ten thousand sightings <strong>of</strong> unidentified flying objects have been filed awayunexplained by competent investigators (I am not referring here to the number <strong>of</strong> cases reported butonly to those unsolved, and my figure is a conservative one), but no bridge has yet been builtbetween this body <strong>of</strong> data and the evidence that exists for psychic phenomena such as precognition,psychokinesis, and telepathy. Such a bridge is needed, not only because current research onparapsychology could shed light on some <strong>of</strong> the more mystifying UFO incidents, but also becausein return, an understanding <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the UFO phenomenon could provide new insights intounusual events that have not yet been duplicated in the laboratory. It would give a clue to themechanism <strong>of</strong> some psychic processes.The nature <strong>of</strong> the problem can be illustrated by another example, a report given to me by a womanliving in Berkeley, California, who once observed a series <strong>of</strong> five round objects crossing the skyover East San Francisco Bay. She immediately thought they must be balloons. Then the first oneaccelerated and, upon reaching a certain spot, shot straight out <strong>of</strong> sight at an unbelievable speed.The second object did the same a few moments later. Then the third object dashed ahead andvanished in the sky. And the fourth, and finally the fifth. The sky was again empty. But in the mind<strong>of</strong> the witness there was a strange thought, the strong suggestion that this "was all right for her tosee." This was accompanied by another thought which almost came as an explicit message: this wasnothing that she should report. And, indeed, she went home without breathing a word <strong>of</strong> the event toanyone, until she attended a lecture where I raised the question <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> unconscious orrepressed contact. How frequently witnesses decide to withhold this kind <strong>of</strong> information has alreadybeen noted.If we disregard the last part <strong>of</strong> the woman's testimony, she is simply another person among millions<strong>of</strong> Americans who believe that, at one time or another, they have seen a UFO. But do we have aright to disregard that section <strong>of</strong> her report? And what happens if we take into consideration the factthat she distinctly felt a direct imperative message had been implanted in her mind, and that it wasas much a part <strong>of</strong> the occurrence as her sensory observation <strong>of</strong> five luminous objects? What happensif we examine the files <strong>of</strong> sightings with an open mind regarding such psychic components? Wefind that phenomena <strong>of</strong> precognition, telepathy, and even healing are not unusual among the reports,especially when they involve close-range observation <strong>of</strong> an object or direct exposure to its light.The Case <strong>of</strong> Dr. XThe following case is among the most thoroughly investigated accounts <strong>of</strong> the interaction betweenhuman percipients (those who have "percieved" the phenomenon by whatever means) and thephenomenon <strong>of</strong> UFOs. It involves a medical doctor who holds an <strong>of</strong>ficial position in southernFrance. What is unusual about this case, which occurred the night <strong>of</strong> November 1, 1968, is thatcompetent investigators (including an astrophysicist, a psychiatrist, and a physiologist) were able togain rapid access to the data and to monitor the development <strong>of</strong> subsequent events withoutinterference from the press or from government authorities. The witness wants absolutely nopublicity in connection with his experiences. Neither his patients nor his immediate family know <strong>of</strong>the events.Shortly before 4:00 A.M., the doctor was awakened by the calls <strong>of</strong> his 14-month-old baby.Experiencing some pain because three days earlier he had injured his leg while chopping wood andstill had a large hematoma (an area <strong>of</strong> accumulated blood under the skin), he got up and found thebaby gesturing toward the window with excitement. Through the shutters, the doctor saw what hefirst took to be flashes <strong>of</strong> lightning, but he paid little attention to this, gave a bottle <strong>of</strong> water to thebaby, and went on to inspect the house, for it was raining very hard (though no thunder could be
heard). The light flashes continued, coming from the western part <strong>of</strong> the wide landscape that can beseen from the south <strong>of</strong> the house, which is built on the side <strong>of</strong> a hill. Opening a large window thatleads onto the terrance, the witness first observed the objects. There were two <strong>of</strong> them, disk-shaped,horizontal, silvery-white on top and bright red underneath.Other details <strong>of</strong> the objects that the doctor was later able to recall include horizontal "antennae" anda vertical antennae on top, while a perfectly cylindrical beam <strong>of</strong> white light illuminated the mistunder the disks. The flashes, which occurred with a periodicity <strong>of</strong> about one second, were markedby a brief increase in the luminosity <strong>of</strong> both disks, followed by a sudden burst <strong>of</strong> light betweenthem. The objects were moving in unison toward the left – that is, toward the center <strong>of</strong> the doctor'sfield <strong>of</strong> view – and they were coming closer, their apparent size increasing while the object thatseemed farthest away came to align itself with the closer one. While they were still approaching(following the trajectory <strong>of</strong> the beams on the ground enabled the witness to ascertain that they wereindeed coming closer), these two disks went through a remarkable transformation: their "antennae"came into contact, the two beams interpenetrated, the flashing activity stopped, and the two craftmerged.There was now a single disk, directly facing the window and still coming nearer, with a single beam<strong>of</strong> white light underneath. After a time (the witness is unable to recall how long), the disk beganflipping from a horizontal to a vertical position, until it was seen as a circle standing on edge. Theshaft <strong>of</strong> light, which had been drawn by the rotation into a sweeping movement toward the house,came to illuminate the entire front and shone straight into the doctor's face. At that instant a bangwas heard and the disk went away, leaving behind a whitish glow which was slowly blown away bythe wind.After these events, the witness wrote a detailed account <strong>of</strong> his sighting, with sketches. He awoke hiswife and told her what had happened. At that point it was she who observed, with considerableamazement, that the swelling and pain in his leg had completely disappeared. In the days thatfollowed, he became aware that all the after-effects <strong>of</strong> a wound he had recieved during the Algerianwar had also dissipated.French science writer Aime Michel, a researcher with the French radio and television organization,visited the witness on November 8, six days after the sighting, and found him tired; he had lostweight since the observation and was very distressed by what had happened to him. That same dayhe experienced cramps and pains in the abdomen, and a red pigmentation appeared around thenavel, forming a triangle. By November 17 this seemingly preposterous phenomenon was welldeveloped. Examinations by a dermatologist led to negative results, but the specialist was sointrigued by this triangular pigmentation without a cause that he decided to document it as a reportto the French Academy <strong>of</strong> Medicine. The witness – who had not told the specialist that everythinghad started with his observation <strong>of</strong> a UFO – requested that on the contrary he given thephenomenon no publicity. During the night <strong>of</strong> November 13-14, the doctor had had a dream inwhich a triangular pattern was seen connected with a flying disk. The same triangle appeared on thebaby's stomach a day or so after the witness's examination. The psychosomatic explanation firstproposed by Aime Michel had to be discarded.When the investigator (who kept the witness under close observation) published the results <strong>of</strong> histwo-year follow-up <strong>of</strong> the case, he noted that there had been no recurrence <strong>of</strong> either the warsequelae or the wound on the leg. The peculiar triangle, however, continued to come and go on boththe father and the son, and would stay visible for two or three days at a time, even when the childwas away and staying with his grandmother, who knew nothing <strong>of</strong> the sighting and was very muchalarmed when she saw the triangular pigmentation. The recurrence <strong>of</strong> the triangle was observedevery year and was again recorded on film in 1986.Like the grandmother, friends <strong>of</strong> the family still know nothing, but they have noted a change in themental attitudes <strong>of</strong> the doctor and his wife: they seem to have acquired an almost mysticalacceptance <strong>of</strong> the events <strong>of</strong> life and death, which is puzzling to those who had known thempreviously. Finally, there is the matter <strong>of</strong> the paranormal phenomena that now take place aroundthem. Coincidences <strong>of</strong> a telepathic nature are frequently reported, and the doctor has allegedly, on at
- Page 3 and 4:
Foreword by Whitley StrieberThere a
- Page 5 and 6:
It is sad that, as the twentieth ce
- Page 7 and 8:
PART ONE: THE ALIEN CHRONICLESIn th
- Page 9 and 10:
lot about it, but nobody said 'Let'
- Page 11 and 12:
The resemblance of the Dogu statues
- Page 13:
various forms of error worship unde
- Page 16 and 17:
them. These apparitions are scarce,
- Page 18 and 19:
was again shot at. Another creature
- Page 20 and 21:
The story is fantastic. Yet it remi
- Page 22 and 23:
their virginity in the sanctuaries
- Page 24 and 25:
A letter from a British woman begin
- Page 26 and 27:
The recollections of the legionnair
- Page 28 and 29:
lades. In less time than it takes t
- Page 30 and 31:
e called Smith said: "No, we cannot
- Page 32 and 33:
Celtic legends, along with the docu
- Page 34 and 35:
probably took place in the second p
- Page 36 and 37:
Australian Air Force Intelligence p
- Page 38 and 39:
ings in the fields and prairies?One
- Page 40 and 41:
From behind the object, two beings
- Page 42 and 43: "in smooth English." They did not s
- Page 44 and 45: to four feet tall, dressed in white
- Page 46 and 47: expectations as if they were mere t
- Page 48 and 49: came out of it, but this person was
- Page 50 and 51: 6. When men did not inhabit most of
- Page 52 and 53: the negative reactions of scientist
- Page 54 and 55: other in appearance, dress, mode of
- Page 56 and 57: saw that they had made a grin, he h
- Page 58 and 59: and rode out after dark in search o
- Page 60 and 61: sighting, and the Sonny Desvergers
- Page 62 and 63: PART TWO: ANOTHER REALITYDuring the
- Page 64 and 65: pencil in a buttonhole with a piece
- Page 66 and 67: short perpendicular line on each en
- Page 68 and 69: sudden displacement of warm air or
- Page 70 and 71: popular today. But a second - and e
- Page 72 and 73: ecorded about 1825 in the Vale of N
- Page 74 and 75: The ikal of the Tzotzils flies thro
- Page 76 and 77: the door, he turned and recieved a
- Page 78 and 79: If Stewart came back today, he woul
- Page 80 and 81: The devil does not have a body. The
- Page 82 and 83: interested in the social implicatio
- Page 84 and 85: Very well, little son. Come back to
- Page 86 and 87: measure. But the phenomenon does ap
- Page 88 and 89: and physical, to determine whether
- Page 90 and 91: previous year. But the fact remains
- Page 94 and 95: least one occasion, experienced lev
- Page 96 and 97: deep unconscious level of the symbo
- Page 98 and 99: much as twenty hours a day, and in
- Page 100 and 101: against me as I stood bracing mysel
- Page 102 and 103: another one, but this was very defi
- Page 104 and 105: not natural, was witnessed by perso
- Page 106 and 107: The predicted miracle took place as
- Page 108 and 109: The phenomenon, it seems, could not
- Page 110 and 111: in the final analysis.Many of us wi
- Page 112 and 113: already surrounded....I was told wh
- Page 114 and 115: Since the publication of my earlier
- Page 116 and 117: ”A bright flash”Fatima, May 13,
- Page 118 and 119: The Invisible CollegeAfter some thi
- Page 120 and 121: the Air Force met in Dallas and dis
- Page 122 and 123: panel of scientists could rapidly b
- Page 124 and 125: it had been hovering there was now
- Page 126 and 127: like piezo-electricity, or static e
- Page 128 and 129: the group teachings and advice. The
- Page 130 and 131: This is a frightening view, one tha
- Page 132 and 133: John McCoy, who coauthored with Wil
- Page 134 and 135: of reports about "the robots" and "
- Page 136 and 137: eathe our air. They walked normally
- Page 138 and 139: the designation Wolf 424.The myster
- Page 140 and 141: a scar or a mark. The authorities w
- Page 142 and 143:
esearches might have a bearing on a
- Page 144 and 145:
me undeniable) and as psychic devic
- Page 146 and 147:
extraterrestrial theory is not stra
- Page 148 and 149:
the universe summarizes the problem
- Page 150 and 151:
About the AuthorAn astrophysicist b