From behind the object, two beings appeared. They were three and a half to four feet tall. Theylooked joyfull. Their smiles displayed white and very thin teeth. They were wearing gray coverallsand reddish leather helmets similar to those used by military drivers. They had what seemed to be a"convexity" at the center <strong>of</strong> their foreheads. Speaking an incomprehensible language, the two closedin on the woman, and one <strong>of</strong> them took the pot containing the flowers. Mrs. Lotti-Dainelli now triedto get her property back, but the two beings ignored her and returned to their craft. The witnessstarted to scream and ran away. She returned to the spot with other witnesses, including policemen.Too late. Not a trace <strong>of</strong> the object was left. But it seems that other people saw the craft in flight,leaving a red and blue trail.These stories would be amazing and nothing more if it were not for one fact known to students <strong>of</strong>folklore: a constant feature <strong>of</strong> one class <strong>of</strong> legends involving supernatural creatures is that thebeings come to our world to steal our products, our animals, and even – as we shall see in a laterchapter – human beings. But for the moment, let us concern ourselves only with the samplegatheringbehavior <strong>of</strong> these beings and their requests for terrestrial products.In an Algonquin legend embodying all the characteristics <strong>of</strong> an excellent saucer story, a hunterbeholds a "basket" that comes down from heaven. The basket contains twelve young maidens <strong>of</strong>ravishing beauty. The man attempts to approach them, but the celestial creatures quickly reenter thebasket, which ascends rapidly out <strong>of</strong> sight. However, witnessing the descent <strong>of</strong> the strange object onanother day, the same hunter uses a trick to come close to it and succeeds in capturing one <strong>of</strong> thegirls, whom he marries and by whom he has a son. Nothing, unfortunately, can console his wife forloss <strong>of</strong> the society <strong>of</strong> her sisters, who have gone away with the flying vehicle. One day she makes asmall basket, and according to Hartland,having entered it with her child she sang the charm she and her sisters had formerly used,and ascended once more to the star from whence she had come.She had been back in that heavenly country two years when she was told:Thy son wants to see his father; go down therefore, to the earth and fetch thy husband, andtell him to bring us specimens <strong>of</strong> all the animals he kills.She did so. And the hunter ascended with his wife, saw his son, and attended a great feast, at whichthe animals he brought were served.The Algonquin story <strong>of</strong>fers a complex mixture <strong>of</strong> themse. Some <strong>of</strong> them are present in modern-dayUFO stories; others derive from traditional concepts, such as the exchange <strong>of</strong> food. The newelements are: (1) the desire expressed by the celestial beings to recieve specimens <strong>of</strong> all the animalsthe hunter kills, and (2) the idea that sexual contact between the terrestrial and the aerial races ispossible.So far, we have seen our visitors stealing plants and requesting various items. But have theyactually killed animals themselves? Have they taken away cattle? If we are to believe the storiestold by many witnesses, they have. But the interesting fact is that, here again, we find a traitcommon to both the ufonauts and the Good People. Crowds <strong>of</strong> elves have been seen chasing cowsand horses. And in the same conversation with Walter Evans-Wentz, recorded before 1909, thestoryteller, "Old Patsy," told the following story about a man "who, if still alive, is now in Americawhere he went several years ago":In the South Island as night was coming on, a man was giving his cow water at a well, and,as he looked on the other side <strong>of</strong> a wall, he saw many strange people playing hurley. Whenthey noticed him looking at them, one came up and struck the cow a hard blow, and turningon the man cut his face and body very badly. The man might not have been so badly <strong>of</strong>f, buthe returned to the well after first encounter and got four times as bad a beating.
On November 6, 1957, twelve-year-old Everett Clark, <strong>of</strong> Dante, Tennessee, opened the door to lethis dog Frisky out. As he did so, he saw a peculiar object in a field a hundred yards or so from thehouse. He thought he was dreaming and went back inside. When he called the dog twenty minuteslater, he found the object was still there, and Frisky was standing near it, along with several dogsfrom the neighborhood. Also near the object were two men and two women in ordinary clothing.One <strong>of</strong> the men made several attempts to catch Frisky, and later another dog, but had to give up forfear <strong>of</strong> being bitten. Everett saw the strange people, who talked between them "like German soldiershe had seen in movies," walk right into the wall <strong>of</strong> the object, which then took <strong>of</strong>f straight upwithout sound. It was oblong and <strong>of</strong> "no particular color."In another <strong>of</strong> the tantalizing coincidences with which UFO researchers are now becoming familiar,on the same day another attempt to steal a dog was made, this time in Everittstown, New Jersey.The name <strong>of</strong> the town in the second case is almost identical to that <strong>of</strong> the witness in the first.While the Clark case had taken place at 6:30 A.M., it was at dusk that John Trasco went outside t<strong>of</strong>eed his dog and saw a brilliant egg-shaped object hovering in front <strong>of</strong> his barn. In his path he met abeing three feet tall "with putty-colored face and large frog-like eyes," who said in broken English:"We are peaceful people, we only want your dog."The strange being was told in no uncertain terms to go back where he belonged. He ran away, andhis machine was seen to take <strong>of</strong>f straight up some moments later. Mrs. Trasco is said to haveobserved the object itself from the house, but not the entity. She is also quoted as saying that whenher husband tried to grab the creature, he got some green powder on his wrist, but that it washed <strong>of</strong>f.The next day he noticed the same powder under his fingernails. The ufonaut has been dressed in agreen suit with shiny buttons, a green tam-o'-shanter-like cap, and gloves with a shiny object at thetip <strong>of</strong> each.Whether the creatures come down in flying saucers or musical baskets, whether they come out <strong>of</strong>the sea or the rock, is irrelevant. What is relevant is what they say and do: the trace each leaves inthe human witness who is the only tangible vehicle <strong>of</strong> the story. This behavior presents us with asample <strong>of</strong> situations and human reactions that trigger our interest, our concern, our laughter. JoeSimonton's pancake story is cute; the tales <strong>of</strong> fairy food are intriguing but difficult to trace; the ringsand the nests are real, but the feeling they inspire is more romantic than scientific. Then there is thestrange beings' desire to get hold <strong>of</strong> terrestrial flora and fauna. The stories quoted in this connectionverge on the ludicrous. But to pursue the investigation further leads to horror. This is a facet <strong>of</strong> thephenomenon we can no longer ignore.Perhaps I have succeeded in evoking a new awareness <strong>of</strong> a parallel between the rumors <strong>of</strong> today andthe beliefs held by our ancestors, beliefs <strong>of</strong> stupendous fights with mysterious supermen, <strong>of</strong> ringswhere magic lingered, <strong>of</strong> dwarfish races haunting the land. In this chapter, I have limited theargument to the mere juxtaposition <strong>of</strong> modern and older beliefs. The faint suspicion <strong>of</strong> a giantmystery, much larger than our current preoccupation with life on other planets, much deeper thanmere reports <strong>of</strong> zigzagging lights – perhaps we should try to understand what these tales, thesemyths, these legends are doing to us. What images are they designed to convey? What hidden needsare they fulfilling? If this is a fabrication, why should it be so absurd? Are there precedents inhistory? Could imagination be a stronger force, to shape the actions <strong>of</strong> men, than its expression indogma, in political structures, in established churches, in armies? If so, could this force be used? Isit being used? Is there a science <strong>of</strong> deception at work here on a grand scale, or could the humanmind generate its own phantoms, in a formidable, collective creation mythology?"Man's imagination, like every known power, works by fixed laws." These words by Hartland,written in 1891, <strong>of</strong>fer a clue. Yes, there is a deep undercurrent to be discovered and mapped behindthese seemingly absurd stories. Emerging sections <strong>of</strong> the underlying pattern have been discoveredand mapped in ages past by long-dead scholars. Today we have the unique opportunity to witnessthe reappearance <strong>of</strong> this current, out in the open – colored, naturally, with our new human biases,our preoccupation with science, our longing for the promised land <strong>of</strong> other planets.A new mythology was needed to bridge the stupendous gap beyond the meaningless present. Theyare providing it. But who are they? Real beings, or the ghosts <strong>of</strong> our own dreams? They spoke to us
- Page 3 and 4: Foreword by Whitley StrieberThere a
- Page 5 and 6: It is sad that, as the twentieth ce
- Page 7 and 8: PART ONE: THE ALIEN CHRONICLESIn th
- Page 9 and 10: lot about it, but nobody said 'Let'
- Page 11 and 12: The resemblance of the Dogu statues
- Page 13: various forms of error worship unde
- Page 16 and 17: them. These apparitions are scarce,
- Page 18 and 19: was again shot at. Another creature
- Page 20 and 21: The story is fantastic. Yet it remi
- Page 22 and 23: their virginity in the sanctuaries
- Page 24 and 25: A letter from a British woman begin
- Page 26 and 27: The recollections of the legionnair
- Page 28 and 29: lades. In less time than it takes t
- Page 30 and 31: e called Smith said: "No, we cannot
- Page 32 and 33: Celtic legends, along with the docu
- Page 34 and 35: probably took place in the second p
- Page 36 and 37: Australian Air Force Intelligence p
- Page 38 and 39: ings in the fields and prairies?One
- Page 42 and 43: "in smooth English." They did not s
- Page 44 and 45: to four feet tall, dressed in white
- Page 46 and 47: expectations as if they were mere t
- Page 48 and 49: came out of it, but this person was
- Page 50 and 51: 6. When men did not inhabit most of
- Page 52 and 53: the negative reactions of scientist
- Page 54 and 55: other in appearance, dress, mode of
- Page 56 and 57: saw that they had made a grin, he h
- Page 58 and 59: and rode out after dark in search o
- Page 60 and 61: sighting, and the Sonny Desvergers
- Page 62 and 63: PART TWO: ANOTHER REALITYDuring the
- Page 64 and 65: pencil in a buttonhole with a piece
- Page 66 and 67: short perpendicular line on each en
- Page 68 and 69: sudden displacement of warm air or
- Page 70 and 71: popular today. But a second - and e
- Page 72 and 73: ecorded about 1825 in the Vale of N
- Page 74 and 75: The ikal of the Tzotzils flies thro
- Page 76 and 77: the door, he turned and recieved a
- Page 78 and 79: If Stewart came back today, he woul
- Page 80 and 81: The devil does not have a body. The
- Page 82 and 83: interested in the social implicatio
- Page 84 and 85: Very well, little son. Come back to
- Page 86 and 87: measure. But the phenomenon does ap
- Page 88 and 89: and physical, to determine whether
- Page 90 and 91:
previous year. But the fact remains
- Page 92 and 93:
Do Not Report This!Accounts such as
- Page 94 and 95:
least one occasion, experienced lev
- Page 96 and 97:
deep unconscious level of the symbo
- Page 98 and 99:
much as twenty hours a day, and in
- Page 100 and 101:
against me as I stood bracing mysel
- Page 102 and 103:
another one, but this was very defi
- Page 104 and 105:
not natural, was witnessed by perso
- Page 106 and 107:
The predicted miracle took place as
- Page 108 and 109:
The phenomenon, it seems, could not
- Page 110 and 111:
in the final analysis.Many of us wi
- Page 112 and 113:
already surrounded....I was told wh
- Page 114 and 115:
Since the publication of my earlier
- Page 116 and 117:
”A bright flash”Fatima, May 13,
- Page 118 and 119:
The Invisible CollegeAfter some thi
- Page 120 and 121:
the Air Force met in Dallas and dis
- Page 122 and 123:
panel of scientists could rapidly b
- Page 124 and 125:
it had been hovering there was now
- Page 126 and 127:
like piezo-electricity, or static e
- Page 128 and 129:
the group teachings and advice. The
- Page 130 and 131:
This is a frightening view, one tha
- Page 132 and 133:
John McCoy, who coauthored with Wil
- Page 134 and 135:
of reports about "the robots" and "
- Page 136 and 137:
eathe our air. They walked normally
- Page 138 and 139:
the designation Wolf 424.The myster
- Page 140 and 141:
a scar or a mark. The authorities w
- Page 142 and 143:
esearches might have a bearing on a
- Page 144 and 145:
me undeniable) and as psychic devic
- Page 146 and 147:
extraterrestrial theory is not stra
- Page 148 and 149:
the universe summarizes the problem
- Page 150 and 151:
About the AuthorAn astrophysicist b