24.11.2012 Views

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Somalia, Khartoum Negotiations 2006<br />

<strong>Mediation</strong> Style and Third-Party<br />

Coord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

The <strong>in</strong>ternational community was kept briefed on<br />

<strong>the</strong> events <strong>in</strong> Khartoum, but <strong>the</strong>re was little or no<br />

direct <strong>in</strong>volvement beyond that. The format <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>gs had not been agreed upon. The<br />

agenda was ra<strong>the</strong>r open; <strong>the</strong>re was no clear separation<br />

between <strong>the</strong> pre-negotiation and negotiation<br />

phases. Formal sessions were rarely held, and procedural<br />

issues, concern<strong>in</strong>g questions such as participants,<br />

location, and agenda, were ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

vaguely decided upon <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal meet<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

There was, however, a clear <strong>in</strong>tention to try and<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> a framework for an agenda for <strong>the</strong> talks,<br />

with details to agreed subsequently. It seems that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was no mediation/facilitation team, only a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> AL diplomats and members <strong>of</strong> various<br />

<strong>in</strong>telligence services. The AL members probably<br />

never made sure that formal decisions were ratified<br />

and discussed; ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y seemed to take an<br />

approach <strong>of</strong> shuttl<strong>in</strong>g from one side to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

try<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>d common ground while discuss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

possible alternatives.<br />

Phases <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Khartoum Talks<br />

First round <strong>of</strong> talks (22 June 2006): Sudanese<br />

President Omar al-Bashir, <strong>the</strong> chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

AL, and <strong>the</strong> AL’s Secretary-General Amr Moussa<br />

were among <strong>the</strong> mediators who met separately<br />

with <strong>the</strong> delegations from <strong>the</strong> TFG and <strong>the</strong> CIC<br />

<strong>in</strong> order to arrange face-to-face peace talks that<br />

were to follow later that day. There was an <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

discussion on political collaboration, which<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly focused on pr<strong>in</strong>ciples ra<strong>the</strong>r than on substantive<br />

issues. The talks were o<strong>the</strong>rwise centered<br />

on security throughout <strong>the</strong> country and a possible<br />

ceasefire.<br />

This was <strong>the</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>of</strong> direct talks between<br />

Yusuf and <strong>the</strong> Islamic courts, giv<strong>in</strong>g weight to <strong>the</strong><br />

negotiations and its outcome. Despite <strong>the</strong> climate<br />

<strong>of</strong> mutual mistrust prior to <strong>the</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g, after<br />

only one day <strong>of</strong> negotiation, <strong>the</strong> two parties<br />

signed a framework agreement – drafted by <strong>the</strong><br />

AL and Sudan – call<strong>in</strong>g for an immediate truce;<br />

an end to media and military campaigns; and <strong>the</strong><br />

judgment <strong>of</strong> war crim<strong>in</strong>als. In this document, <strong>the</strong><br />

transitional government and <strong>the</strong> CIC <strong>of</strong>ficially<br />

recognized <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side’s legitimacy. 187 It was<br />

signed by a prom<strong>in</strong>ent scholar represent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

CIC and by <strong>the</strong> Somali foreign m<strong>in</strong>ister. Two<br />

particularly contentious issues, power-shar<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>the</strong> need for a peacekeep<strong>in</strong>g force, were postponed<br />

to a second round <strong>of</strong> talks scheduled for<br />

15 July 2006. The quick results were due to two<br />

factors: First, <strong>the</strong> parties agreed on vague word<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forces and shar<strong>in</strong>g tasks, i.e.,<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g that demanded major technical discussions.<br />

Second, it is plausible that all participants<br />

simply went through <strong>the</strong> motions <strong>in</strong> order to satisfy<br />

<strong>the</strong> AL and Sudan, know<strong>in</strong>g that noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

would be done, which made it easy to sign an<br />

agreement.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> days after <strong>the</strong> sign<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ceasefire, developments<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIC threw <strong>the</strong> agreement<br />

<strong>in</strong>to question. The radical part <strong>of</strong> CIC convened<br />

a meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> like-m<strong>in</strong>ded leaders from o<strong>the</strong>r clans<br />

and regions and reconstituted <strong>the</strong> CIC <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

more broadly-based group<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> Supreme<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Islamic Courts (SCIC). Though <strong>the</strong><br />

moderate spokesman for <strong>the</strong> CIC rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong><br />

head <strong>of</strong> a new eight-man executive, <strong>the</strong> new<br />

body’s much stronger legislative council was<br />

headed by <strong>the</strong> spiritual leader Hassan Dahir<br />

Aweys, who is wanted by <strong>the</strong> US <strong>in</strong> connection<br />

with terrorist acts. The relative powers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> executive<br />

and legislative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SCIC was unclear. 188<br />

This turn <strong>of</strong> events alarmed Western governments<br />

and especially Ethiopia, which now saw its<br />

fears <strong>of</strong> a Somalia controlled by radical clerics realized.<br />

Pre-negotiation for second round <strong>of</strong> talks (July–<br />

September 2006): The planned follow-up talks<br />

were postponed from 15 July until 2 September<br />

2006, due to divisions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terim government<br />

over how to handle <strong>the</strong> SCIC’s dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />

and <strong>the</strong> total refusal <strong>of</strong> religious leaders to<br />

attend meet<strong>in</strong>gs with <strong>the</strong> TFG after confirmed<br />

reports that Ethiopian troops had entered Somalia<br />

<strong>in</strong> July. In try<strong>in</strong>g to salvage <strong>the</strong> upcom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

peace talks, AL diplomats carried out shuttle diplomacy<br />

between <strong>the</strong> conflict<strong>in</strong>g parties while<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g on an agenda for <strong>the</strong> second round <strong>of</strong><br />

187 “Somalis sceptical over peace accord”, <strong>in</strong>: Mail & Guardian (23<br />

June 2006), (http://www.mg.co.za).<br />

188 Cromwell, Richard: “Somali Islamic Militia Defy Truce”, The<br />

Institute for Security Studies (28 June 2006),<br />

(http://www.issafrica.org).<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!