24.11.2012 Views

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Western Sahara, The Baker Plans<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposals, which later became<br />

known as <strong>the</strong> “Settlement Plan”, were a ceasefire<br />

and a popular referendum on <strong>the</strong> future status <strong>of</strong><br />

Western Sahara. 236 The UN Mission for <strong>the</strong> Referendum<br />

<strong>in</strong> Western Sahara (MINURSO) was established<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1991, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> its mandate<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ceasefire and <strong>the</strong> organization<br />

<strong>of</strong> a free and fair referendum. 237 The<br />

ceasefire was announced on 6 September 1991 <strong>in</strong><br />

agreement with both parties and has largely held<br />

until today. In 1993, <strong>the</strong> UN set up an Identification<br />

Commission (IDC) mandated with <strong>the</strong> task<br />

<strong>of</strong> compil<strong>in</strong>g a list <strong>of</strong> voters for <strong>the</strong> referendum.<br />

The process was repeatedly stalled by recurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

disagreements between <strong>the</strong> parties over <strong>the</strong> criteria<br />

for registration and <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electorate.<br />

The IDC concluded its activities <strong>in</strong> 2004<br />

after hav<strong>in</strong>g presented two provisional voter<br />

lists. 238<br />

On 18 March 1997, UN Secretary-General K<strong>of</strong>i<br />

Annan appo<strong>in</strong>ted former US secretary <strong>of</strong> state<br />

James A. Baker his personal envoy for Western<br />

Sahara. After visit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> region and separately<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two parties, he <strong>in</strong>vited<br />

<strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> Morocco, <strong>the</strong> Frente<br />

Polisario, and <strong>the</strong> governments <strong>of</strong> Algeria and<br />

Mauritania to direct talks <strong>in</strong> London. All <strong>the</strong> parties<br />

sent <strong>the</strong>ir delegations. After four rounds <strong>of</strong> direct<br />

talks <strong>in</strong> London, Lisbon, and Houston, on<br />

14-16 September 1997 an agreement was reached<br />

on a number <strong>of</strong> critical issues, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g voter<br />

identification, refugee issues, and prisoners <strong>of</strong><br />

war. However, <strong>the</strong> agreement did not lead to a<br />

breakthrough towards peace, and <strong>the</strong> fundamental<br />

positions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties rema<strong>in</strong>ed far apart. In<br />

May 2000, Baker arranged aga<strong>in</strong> direct meet<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

with <strong>the</strong> parties with <strong>the</strong> aim to resolve <strong>the</strong> problems<br />

relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Settlement<br />

Plan. However, several rounds <strong>of</strong> talks<br />

did not lead to any compromise. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, Baker<br />

concluded that <strong>the</strong> talks had even deepened <strong>the</strong><br />

differences between <strong>the</strong> parties. 239 Annan agreed<br />

with Baker that <strong>the</strong>re were “serious doubts<br />

236 United Nations: “Security Council Resolution 690” (29 April<br />

1991).<br />

237 MINURSO: “Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mission Mandate“,<br />

(http://www.m<strong>in</strong>urso.unlb.org/mission.html).<br />

238 MINURSO: “Milestones <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Western Sahara Conflict”, p. 3,<br />

(http://www.m<strong>in</strong>urso.unlb.org/milestones.pdf).<br />

239 Jensen, Erik: “Western Sahara – Anatomy <strong>of</strong> a Stalemate”,<br />

Colorado USA: Lynne Riener Publishers (2005), p. 103.<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Settlement Plan can be implemented<br />

<strong>in</strong> its present form” 240 and that an alternative solution<br />

had to be found<br />

Negotiation Phase<br />

Negotiation Setup and Process<br />

In 2001, Baker worked out a plan entitled <strong>the</strong><br />

Personal Envoy’s Draft Framework Agreement,<br />

also known as Baker Plan I, and presented it to<br />

<strong>the</strong> parties. The document was strenuously rejected<br />

by representatives <strong>of</strong> Polisario, who stated<br />

that it aimed at “<strong>the</strong> precipitous <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Saharan Territory <strong>in</strong>to Morocco”. 241 Both Polisario<br />

and Algeria refused to even discuss it any<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r, and Baker soon had to accept its complete<br />

failure.<br />

In March 2003, Annan presented to <strong>the</strong> Security<br />

Council Baker’s “<strong>Peace</strong> Plan for Self-<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> People <strong>of</strong> Western Sahara”,<br />

which would also be known as <strong>the</strong> Baker Plan<br />

II. 242 The Frente Polisario <strong>in</strong>itially expressed extensive<br />

criticism concern<strong>in</strong>g different po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Baker Plan II. However, <strong>in</strong> a surpris<strong>in</strong>g move,<br />

it soon <strong>of</strong>ficially accepted it. This was seen by<br />

some as a tactical maneuver, s<strong>in</strong>ce Morocco had<br />

counted on Polisario to reject <strong>the</strong> plan. By <strong>the</strong><br />

time <strong>of</strong> Polisario’s acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan, Morocco<br />

had already replied critically to many aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan. In a letter to Baker dated 9<br />

April 2004, <strong>the</strong> government <strong>of</strong> Morocco rejected<br />

<strong>the</strong> Baker Plan II. In June 2004, Baker resigned<br />

as personal envoy.<br />

Key Issues dur<strong>in</strong>g Negotiations<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> element <strong>of</strong> dispute is a UN-backed referendum<br />

on <strong>the</strong> political status <strong>of</strong> Western Sahara;<br />

particularly contentious are <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

referendum as well as <strong>the</strong> vot<strong>in</strong>g population. Polisario<br />

has <strong>in</strong>sisted that only <strong>in</strong>dividuals who were<br />

registered dur<strong>in</strong>g a census held <strong>in</strong> 1974 would<br />

qualify. That census only registered part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sahrawi population, s<strong>in</strong>ce a lot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>habitants<br />

240 Ibid., p. 106.<br />

241 United Nations: “Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretary-General S/2003/41”<br />

(10 January 2002).<br />

242 United Nations: “<strong>Peace</strong> plan for self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people<br />

<strong>of</strong> Western Sahara”, <strong>in</strong>: Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretary-General<br />

S/2003/565, Annex II (2003).<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!