24.11.2012 Views

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

Unpacking the Mystery of Mediation in African Peace ... - Swisspeace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“If you want to make peace with your enemy, you have to<br />

work with your enemy. Then he becomes your partner.”<br />

<strong>Mediation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>African</strong> <strong>Peace</strong> Processes:<br />

Carefully Compar<strong>in</strong>g Apples and Oranges<br />

By Simon J A Mason, <strong>Mediation</strong> Support Project, Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Mediation</strong> is a mystery. Some peace processes are<br />

successful, some are dismal failures, and most are<br />

a bit <strong>of</strong> both. The transition <strong>of</strong> a society from<br />

war to peace is extremely complex and difficult.<br />

Conflict parties use military means to reach <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

aims, sometimes kill<strong>in</strong>g thousands or tens <strong>of</strong><br />

thousands <strong>of</strong> people <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

peace process, conflict parties may slowly realize<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y can ga<strong>in</strong> more from negotiat<strong>in</strong>g than<br />

from fight<strong>in</strong>g. This takes time, however. It also<br />

takes people who talk to <strong>the</strong> conflict parties to<br />

try and understand <strong>the</strong>ir motives and <strong>in</strong>tentions,<br />

and why <strong>the</strong>y have chosen arms as <strong>the</strong>ir means <strong>of</strong><br />

settl<strong>in</strong>g issues.<br />

There is no ethical reason for refus<strong>in</strong>g to talk<br />

even to <strong>the</strong> world’s worst human rights violators<br />

if <strong>the</strong>reby lives can be saved, and if this helps to<br />

transform a war-torn society <strong>in</strong>to a society mov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

towards peace, justice, and democracy. On<br />

<strong>the</strong> contrary, <strong>the</strong>re are good ethical reasons for<br />

talk<strong>in</strong>g to such people, even if <strong>the</strong> task is a delicate<br />

and very difficult one. The decision <strong>of</strong> talk<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or not, however, must also be based on case<br />

by case pragmatic and political considerations,<br />

not only on ethical ones. 1 This challenge is one<br />

reason why mediation <strong>in</strong> contemporary peace<br />

1 UN Special Representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretary General, Lakhdar<br />

Barhimi argues for this pragmatic approach: “If you accept<br />

<strong>the</strong>se k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> jobs, you go and mediate between warlords, faction<br />

leaders, bandits, all sorts <strong>of</strong> people, people whom <strong>the</strong> human<br />

rights purists want to see hang. What I tell <strong>the</strong>m is ‘Let<br />

me f<strong>in</strong>ish, and <strong>the</strong>n go ahead and hang <strong>the</strong>m.’” He was also<br />

asked if he would talk to Osama b<strong>in</strong> Laden. “If I were to mediate<br />

between Al Qaeda and <strong>the</strong> United States, I suppose I<br />

would have to. But we are not <strong>the</strong>re yet, are we? And Osama<br />

would refuse to talk to me, you have to remember that.” Mart<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Harriet: “K<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peace</strong>, Pawns <strong>of</strong> War: The Untold<br />

Story <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peace</strong>-Mak<strong>in</strong>g”, London, New York: Cont<strong>in</strong>uum International<br />

Publish<strong>in</strong>g Group (2006), p.25-26.<br />

Nelson Mandela<br />

processes is surrounded by a certa<strong>in</strong> mysterious<br />

aura. Simple answers are out <strong>of</strong> place, and it is not<br />

helpful to exam<strong>in</strong>e mediation as a purely technical<br />

or academic topic. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is also wrong to<br />

endow mediation with excessive mystification,<br />

thus plac<strong>in</strong>g it beyond <strong>the</strong> bounds <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />

research and learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Aim and rationale: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to<br />

partially “unpack” <strong>the</strong> mystery <strong>of</strong> mediation, <strong>in</strong><br />

order to learn about <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> mediation <strong>in</strong> <strong>African</strong><br />

peace processes dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last decade. Ultimately,<br />

<strong>the</strong> goal is to provide better support for<br />

ongo<strong>in</strong>g and future mediation efforts <strong>in</strong> such<br />

peace processes. The study was mandated by <strong>the</strong><br />

Political Division IV <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swiss Federal Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Foreign Affairs as preparation for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

2008 conference on “<strong>Mediation</strong> <strong>in</strong> Africa”. However,<br />

it also spr<strong>in</strong>gs from a longer-term <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong><br />

Africa as <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ent with <strong>the</strong> most peace<br />

agreements signed world-wide. 2<br />

Comparative approach: In order to avoid stereotypes<br />

and commonplaces, <strong>the</strong> study uses a bottomup<br />

approach, start<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>in</strong>dividual cases, but<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g a similar analytical structure <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

allow for comparison. The subsequent comparison<br />

2 In <strong>the</strong> period 1989–2004, 76 peace agreements were signed <strong>in</strong> 20<br />

conflicts <strong>in</strong> Africa, 31 peace agreements <strong>in</strong> 6 conflicts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Americas (ma<strong>in</strong>ly Guatemala and El Salvador), 16 peace agreements<br />

<strong>in</strong> ten conflicts <strong>in</strong> Asia, n<strong>in</strong>e peace agreements <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

(e.g., former Yugoslav republics, Moldova, and Georgia), and <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Middle East, seven peace agreements were signed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> conflict<br />

over Palest<strong>in</strong>e. Högbladh, St<strong>in</strong>a. “Patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peace</strong> Agreements:<br />

Present<strong>in</strong>g new data on <strong>Peace</strong> Processes and <strong>Peace</strong><br />

Agreements”. Paper presented at <strong>the</strong> annual meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> International<br />

Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and<br />

Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA (22 March<br />

2006). Available at http://www.allacademic.com/meta/<br />

p99120_<strong>in</strong>dex.html quoted with permission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!