KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

expansion they were seeking. She said it would not be a financial hardship, but they would liketo continue to work on site preparation. If continued site prep was possible, it would be okay todelay the decision.Principal Planner French mentioned that the reason staff recommended denial of the variance,but approval on the CUP, was to deny the variance for area and height, so that the PlanningCommission could give staff direction on a text amendment to Title 60. The recommendedapproval of the CUP on the following case by the same applicants was to allow them someability to prepare the site while they wait for a change in the code.Member Deal said he would rather see the Planning Commission change something in the KGBCode than make an exception for the variance as presented.The Commission asked staff to research and develop a text amendment to address detachedduplexes and the current design standards for DADUs and bring to the Commission at theregular July meeting.Upon roll call, the vote on the MOTION was:YES: DEALNO: DOHERTY, HARRINGTON, MECK, MEDFORD, POPPENMOTION DECLARED FAILEDM/S HARRINGTON/MEDFORD to reconsider Resolution 3552 B.Upon roll call, the vote on the MOTION was:YES: DEAL, DOHERTY, MEDFORD, MECK, HARRINGTON, POPPENMOTION DECLARED CARRIEDM/S HARRINGTON/MECK to table the motion until the regular meeting in October.Upon roll call, the vote on the MOTION was:YES: DEAL, POPPEN, MECK, DOHERTY, MEDFORD, HARRINGTONMOTION DECLARED CARRIEDADJOURNMENT…The meeting adjourned at 9:23p.m.__________________________Alethea JohnsonPlatting/Zoning Clerk_____________________________Gregg Poppen, ChairPlanning Commission/Platting BoardPlanning Commission/Platting BoardJune 12, 2012 2
K E T C H I K A N G A T E W A Y B O R O U G HPLANNING COMMISSION/PLATTING BOARDRESOLUTION NO. 3552 BA Resolution of the Ketchikan Gateway Borough Planning Commission Denying aRequest by Stan Berntson and Sharon Geldaker for a Major Variance to Allow anExisting Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (DADU) to be Expanded to Exceed theMaximum Gross Floor Area of 720 Square Feet by 288 Square Feet and to Exceed theMaximum Height Limit of One Story by One Story to Create a 1008 Square Foot, TwoStory DADU at 8476 South Tongass Hwy. (Case 12-043)FINDINGS1. The Planning Commission found that this request is not in the best interests of theresidents of the Ketchikan Gateway Borough.2. The conditions requiring the variance being sought are created by the applicant.3. The subject parcel is not subject to greater hardship or burden as compared tosurrounding properties.4. The requested variance is not the minimum required.NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE FINDINGS, IT ISRESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION/PLATTING BOARD OF THE KETCHIKANGATEWAY BOROUGH, ALASKA, as follows:SECTION 1: That the request for a Major Variance to allow an existing detached accessorydwelling unit to be expanded to exceed the maximum gross floor area of 720 square feet by288 square feet and to exceed the maximum height limit of one story by one story to create a1008 square foot, two story Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (DADU), be DENIED, subject tothe findings of fact contained herein.
Page 1 and 2: KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGHPLANNING C
Page 3 and 4: 3ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis work has been
Page 5 and 6: Upon roll call the vote on the MOTI
Page 7: K E T C H I K A N G A T E W A Y B O
Page 11 and 12: Part I.GENERAL INFORMATIONMeeting D
Page 13 and 14: that exceeds one story in height, b
Page 15: B. APPLICATION
Page 19 and 20: Option B - exceeds height, but not
Page 21: C. MAPS
Page 26 and 27: Owner_Name Address CITY STATEZIPBER
Page 30 and 31: PLANNING COMMISSION DOCKETMeeting D
Page 62 and 63:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPrefaceTable of Re
Page 65 and 66:
KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGH CODE 17.0
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
show all

KETCHIKAN GATEWAY BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?