Barts Health Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment Report
Barts Health Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment Report
Barts Health Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment Report
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Barts</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Equality</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Report</strong>Figure 3.1.1a: % of people who, overall, felt they were treated with respect <strong>and</strong> dignity whilst in thehospital/at the Outpatients Department by age (2010/11) (merged total for all Trusts)Over a third of people (36.36%) aged 16-39 said they weren’t always treated with dignity <strong>and</strong>respect, 30.34% of people aged 40-59 <strong>and</strong> 17.59% of people aged 70-79.This pattern is discernible within the three Trusts individually. It should also be noted thatwithin the 70-79 aged range there is a significant number of inpatients at BLT (7.94%) <strong>and</strong>outpatients at Newham (21.5%) who say they were not treated with dignity <strong>and</strong> respect.EthnicityAs figure 3.1.1b below shows, people from Bangladeshi <strong>and</strong> Indian backgrounds were morelikely to say they were not always treated with dignity <strong>and</strong> respect. People from Irish <strong>and</strong>White British backgrounds were most likely to say they were.145
Change language